- 181. Re: [RTTY] ARRL 10 (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 05:54:18 -0500
- Don Hill wrote: "Maybe we should organize a 10 meter RTTY contest in the lull between JARTS in October and WAE in November" Don't think it's necessary? DARC 10-Meter Digital Contest 1100Z-1700Z, Nov
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00057.html (7,335 bytes)
- 182. Re: [RTTY] "Slashed" Zeros vs. the number "Zero" (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 04:50:23 -0500
- "Kok Chen" <chen@mac.com> wrote: "I think what N1ND refers to are characters which look like zeros but are not." Hmmmmmmmmmmm....kindasorta dispels the "if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, th
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00129.html (7,555 bytes)
- 183. Re: [RTTY] W6WRT OK contest score (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 09:48:00 -0500
- "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242@ispwest.com> wrote: " 40 meters is getting better with every contest" I choose to participate in RAC, instead of OK RTTY, and confirmed what I had already suspected...."40 m
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00145.html (7,161 bytes)
- 184. [WriteLog] Re: [RTTY] OK contest scores (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:38:35 -0500
- "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net> wrote: "many folk have not read the rules of the OK contest correctly" Although I choose not to participate, I did see the pre-contest post regarding the rule cha
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00159.html (7,283 bytes)
- 185. Re: [RTTY] 160 RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 12:50:24 -0500
- "Larry L Lindblom" <llindblom@juno.com> wrote: "If we really want to shake up 160, someone needs to organize a 160 RTTY contest!" Until "running out of contest time, with people still to work, instea
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00260.html (7,228 bytes)
- 186. [RTTY] Fw: [CQ-Contest] NAQP CW/SSB/RTTY Contest Reminders (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:21:11 -0500
- This is for those that do not also subscribe to cq-contest@contesting.com, as it also applies to NAQP RTTY> Use to site. single-op correctly as other _______________________________________________ R
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00069.html (9,822 bytes)
- 187. Re: [RTTY] Re: Contest Happenings?? (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 06:24:14 -0500
- "Dick Kriss, AA5VU" <aa5vu@arrl.net> wrote: " I learn something new in each contest." Then, IMHO, your contest effort was a success! Personally, I fail to see any reason to acknowledge the "other sta
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00296.html (7,193 bytes)
- 188. Re: [RTTY] Re: Contest Happenings?? (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:56:04 -0500
- I said: "Personally, I fail to see any reason to acknowledge the "other station's" report:", and what I meant was "there is no reason to acknowledge the other station's ACTUAL exchange"!!! I don't ne
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00307.html (8,150 bytes)
- 189. Re: [RTTY] Re: Contest Happenings?? (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:30:43 -0500
- "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy> wrote: "Well Shelby. You are quite wrong." Maybe I am, or maybe I'm just not very good at "typing what I mean"? If I don't get asked for a repeat on my exchange,
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00310.html (8,376 bytes)
- 190. Re: [RTTY] Re: Contest Happenings?? (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:44:29 -0500
- "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com> wrote: "when the originator sends cards for 'every' single QSO he ever made with me" WOW, do I relate to that! I do use labels, or "direct" printing, and I feel sure
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00333.html (10,317 bytes)
- 191. Re: [RTTY] NAQP, the Sprint and RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:49:17 -0500
- "WI8W" <wi8w@wi8w.org> wrote: "This is a conflict that apparently will be around for a few more years because of this rule." Simple solution, at least for me....as WPX is a 48 hour contest, allowing
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00079.html (7,250 bytes)
- 192. Re: [RTTY] 6O0CW RTTY SPOTS (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 06:22:43 -0500
- "WI8W" <wi8w@wi8w.org> wrote: "Here are the RTTY Spots from last week. Taken from the RTTY DX Notes" How much more valuable, to all, it would be, if the location of the originating station(s) for eac
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00139.html (7,338 bytes)
- 193. Re: [RTTY] GU0SUP WPX(LP) (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 05:15:59 -0500
- Hi Phil. Nice to "see" you, again. I hope your convalescence goes well! C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW (WW4KY) _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00201.html (6,426 bytes)
- 194. Re: [RTTY] K4GMH SOAB HP (WPX) (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:26:59 -0500
- "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net> wrote: "I'm just not sure how we can go about fixing this problem." About the only "fix" is to work them, even if they are a dupe? Personally, I don't care to w
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00219.html (7,789 bytes)
- 195. Re: [RTTY] The MMMM's !! (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 20:45:55 -0500
- "Jeff Stai WK6I" <wk6i@twistedoak.com> wrote: "appropriate phone contest" I didn't know such a thing existed? C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTT
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00303.html (7,822 bytes)
- 196. [RTTY] Team SO1R (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 20:59:56 -0500
- Team: SO1R W1ZT(GEORGE) K4GMH(MIKE) WX4TM(TOM) K9MUG(ROD) K4WW(BO) _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/r
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00363.html (6,081 bytes)
- 197. Re: [RTTY] Announcing TEAM SO2R (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:25:40 -0500
- Larry, <llindblom@juno.com> wrote: "SO1ROF (single op one radio old fart)" Guilty, as charged! It sure beats the alternative! :>) C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW _______________________________________________ R
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00373.html (7,099 bytes)
- 198. [RTTY] NAQP RTTY Log Submissions (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:09:04 -0500
- The preferred log submission method for all NCJ-sponsored contests in 2005 is the web upload form. This method has now been successfully used for 4 contests. The advantage for the participants is an
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00378.html (7,149 bytes)
- 199. [RTTY] NAQP Log Submission (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 06:24:44 -0500
- For those that plan on participating in NAQP RTTY, but do not use a dedicated contest logging program, please take a look at: http://www.b4h.net/cabforms/nasprintrtty_cab.php Please address any quest
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00386.html (6,400 bytes)
- 200. Re: [RTTY] NAQP RTTY practice (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 06:13:19 -0500
- "WI8W" <wi8w@wi8w.org> wrote: "I have actually worked stations that used different names on different bands with the same callsign." "If the name sent is changed during the contest, as sometimes happ
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00415.html (7,141 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu