Mail Archive Search: <+from:k4ww@arrl.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:k4ww@arrl.net: 527 ]

Total 527 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [RTTY] Spring Break RTTY Sprint (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 13:59:57 -0400; "Peter Laws" <plaws@plaws.net> wrote: 5BWAS! I didn't say "one contact per band"! I said "every contest contact"! How many times can one need KY confirmed on one band! I receive literally hundred's o; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00052.html (8,512 bytes)
142. Re: LoTW WAS -> RE: [RTTY] Spring Break RTTY Sprint (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 14:13:58 -0400; "Schulz Jonathan" <jonathan.schulz@siemens.com> wrote: "Gee what a disappointment it would be to never get the "first" QSO confirmed..." IMHO, there is a great difference between a QSO and a contest; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00053.html (7,591 bytes)
143. [RTTY] T33C RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 05:33:12 -0400; Very strange propagation? I'm curious if any EU stations are hearing/working T33C on any of the below listed frequencies? I can't imagine the propagation being that much different? K4JAJ 7040.0 T33C; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00133.html (6,552 bytes)
144. Re: [RTTY] Re: Rtty and Ritty (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:52:19 -0400; "Kok Chen" <chen@mac.com> wrote: "the KAMs are pretty simple" Possibly the main reason I use a KAMPlus! :)) C'Ya, Shelby _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contest; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00203.html (7,920 bytes)
145. Re: [RTTY] RE: Lousy signals (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 05:39:04 -0400; "Phil Cooper" <Phil.Cooper@cwgg.cwplc.com> wrote: "The originators of these signals also do not subscribe to this or any other reflectors either!" Finally, after all this technical talk, someone post; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00255.html (6,796 bytes)
146. [RTTY] 14100.0 Interference (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 17:01:12 -0400; I only hope someone, other than me, has been listening/calling on/about 14100.0 and documented the intentional interference? I never cease to be amazed as to why some people spend good money for equi; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00304.html (6,387 bytes)
147. [RTTY] K4WW SOABHP (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 12:35:11 -0400; Call: K4WW Operator(s): K4WW Station: K4WW Class: SOAB HP QTH: KY Operating Time (hrs): 10 Summary: Band QSOs Pts Mults -- 80: 5 10 40: 45 291 20: 187 1503 15: 63 523 10: 0 0 -- Total: 300 2327 111 +; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00311.html (7,521 bytes)
148. Re: [RTTY-TARA] Re: [RTTY] SPDX contest (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 15:26:50 -0400; "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com> wrote: "Some representative DX stations worked include HK6PSG, I1COB and 9A5W." If/when you have trouble printing 9A5W, check and make sure your radio is; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00324.html (7,132 bytes)
149. Re: [RTTY] Email adr for SP RTTY ? (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 21:13:51 -0400; "DJ3IW Goetz" <dj3iw@t-online.de> wrote: "where should the logs for the recent SP RTTY contest go to? I tried both email addresses: sprtty@log.z.pl and sp2uuu@pkrvg.z.pl. Both mails bounced." Same he; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00336.html (7,244 bytes)
150. [RTTY] TO4E RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 15:56:38 -0400; Received today, for 15 and 17 meters. Sent direct, 12/23/2003, via F5OGL. C'Ya, Shelby _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00007.html (6,612 bytes)
151. Re: [RTTY] KAM Plus and MMTTY (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 06:33:22 -0400; Pete D'Elia" <petedelia@msn.com wrote: " No matter what settings I use, I can't get MMTTY to xmit to the Kam Plus." Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net wrote replied: "The KAM Plus and MMTTY are redundant. Y; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00043.html (7,295 bytes)
152. [RTTY] Share Room at Dayton (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 06:32:36 -0400; Rather than make the "drive up/back" on Saturday, there is a possibility I will come to Dayton, late Friday afternoon? I won't know for sure until noon on Friday. My earliest arrival would be between; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00097.html (6,484 bytes)
153. [RTTY] K4WW SOABHP Anatolian RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 12:52:45 -0400; Several "firsts"! First entry in this particular contest. First experience with WriteLog. I had no "goals", just familiarize myself with WriteLog, and try not to inconvenience anyone else. I'm sure I; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00120.html (7,024 bytes)
154. Re: [RTTY] 160M is open (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 06:38:08 -0400; "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net> wrote: "160 RTTY in mid-May...are we hard core or a bit daffy? ;-)" Well said!!!! I'm not sure that I understand, or need to, the continuing infatuation with 160 meter R; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00156.html (7,502 bytes)
155. [RTTY] K4WW SOABHP (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 20:17:48 -0400; Band conditions certainly left some to be desired, and the passing thunderstorms, on both days, didn't help matters, either! Participation seemed about normal? No sense in "preaching to the choir", b; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-06/msg00058.html (7,461 bytes)
156. [RTTY] Fw: [Kenwood] AVVid is closing (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 10:56:45 -0400; Saw this on the Kenwood reflector, and thought it would be of interest to other Kenwood owners. C'Ya, Shelby in _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com h; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-06/msg00102.html (8,432 bytes)
157. Re: [RTTY] FD RTTY Ops? (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 05:01:55 -0400; "Mark Perrin" <mperrin@ordata.com> wrote: "I plan to work RTTY this weekend from home (1D IL)" "4.6. (Class D) Home stations: Stations operating from permanent or licensed station locations using com; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-06/msg00157.html (7,370 bytes)
158. Re: [RTTY] UK RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:39:16 -0400; Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com> wrote: "I did call CQ UK Test on 1810 kc with 400 watts between 0030-0630 UTC with no takers" WOW, 6 hours with no takers! I get concerned, early in a con; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-07/msg00062.html (6,768 bytes)
159. Re: [RTTY] NAQP Rules - Part 5 question! (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 06:42:37 -0400; "Wayne Matlock" <k7wm@i10net.com> wrote: "Its the spirit of the thing." The NAQP rules are the same for each contest, regardless of the mode, and I don't remember, ever seeing anyone needing a clarif; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-07/msg00124.html (8,230 bytes)
160. Re: [RTTY] naqp received logs (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:48:08 -0400; "dennis o'connor" <k8do@mailblocks.com wrote: "Ya can't fight, The Force (propagation)" I agree, and probably the "highlight" of my operating time, was being told "no amp in this contest", all the wh; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-07/msg00208.html (7,242 bytes)

Current List: 141 - 160
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]