Mail Archive Search: <+from:k4ww@arrl.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:k4ww@arrl.net: 527 ]

Total 527 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Was W4UK the only SC stn in the RU? (score: 1): Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 15:10:28 -0500; Jerry...now you know how I feel after almost every contest! Not this one though!! Most of my posts read: "anyone else NOT work KY" C'Ya, Shelby; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00088.html (7,174 bytes)
2. [RTTY] K4WW M/SLP (score: 1): Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 18:22:28 -0500; While I seldom, if ever, set any goals for any contest, simply because there are far too many uncontrollable factors involved! Usually, I only attempt to better the last effort. My original "game pla; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00102.html (7,464 bytes)
3. [RTTY] RTTY Roundup AJ3M M/S HP (score: 1): Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 05:30:23 -0500; N3SL@aol.com wrote: "Time to actively recruit and indoctrinate some new brethren...." As "my ole pappy" would have said: "couldn't have said it better myowndamnself"! As RTTY contesters, I firmly bel; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00119.html (9,935 bytes)
4. [RTTY] DE (score: 1): Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 19:03:10 -0500; George Johnson" <w1zt@attbi.com wrote: " I also want my callsign highlighted" Personally, it doesn't matter to me if my call is "highlighted", just as long as it is entered in the log "correctly", ma; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00137.html (7,622 bytes)
5. [RTTY] K4WW MOABLP (score: 1): Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 06:04:57 -0500; IMHO, not nearly as much activity as 2001, and, at least from here, band conditions no nearly as good? I suppose I'm a "glutton for punishment", as using low power from KY certainly qualifies as an "; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-12/msg00039.html (6,689 bytes)
6. [RTTY] KH6GMP/KH3 RTTY (score: 1): Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 05:43:14 -0500; Having missed Gary prior to 10 meter contest, anyone seen him since? I can find no recent spots in the DX Summit database? Thanks. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year C'Ya, Shelby; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-12/msg00075.html (6,214 bytes)
7. [RTTY] MERRY CHRISTMAS (score: 1): Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 09:24:28 -0500; To all...and may 2003 be a very prosperous one for each! And may your call's appear on my screen in such abundance, that I will need SO2R! :))))) C'Ya, Shelby; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-12/msg00123.html (6,379 bytes)
8. [RTTY] K4WW/7 (score: 1): Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 05:41:01 -0500; As the second anniversary, of what was one of my most satisfying experiences in 20+ years of operating nears, I'm concerned that there may be some that may still need confirmation of Nevada on RTTY.; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-12/msg00140.html (7,034 bytes)
9. [RTTY] 9N7AS RTTY (score: 1): Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 06:34:47 -0500; I notice several "JA and EU" originated spots for this station. Any US stations heard/worked him? Thanks. C'Ya, Shelby; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-12/msg00141.html (6,128 bytes)
10. [RTTY] 9L1BTB RTTY (score: 1): Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 20:41:28 -0500; Received today, direct from SP7BTB. Four week turnaround. C'Ya, Shelby; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00012.html (6,068 bytes)
11. [RTTY] Incorrect Call's (score: 1): Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 19:00:18 -0500; This is not an opinion of the value of eQSL, but simply trying to determine how/why, after almost every contest, I will get a eQSL request from a station that I have worked in a contest, but I didn't; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00026.html (7,731 bytes)
12. [RTTY] Working WAEDC with with WF1B RTTY (score: 1): Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 06:29:42 -0500; "David Fisher" <d.c.fisher@att.net> asked: "How does one update the WF1B program for the changed WAEDC multipliers?" If their log checking efficiency is equal to their award handling, I suspect that; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00051.html (7,115 bytes)
13. [RTTY] Re: [CQ-Contest] Busted calls and Uniques (score: 1): Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 06:15:53 -0500; "VR2BrettGraham" <vr2bg@harts.org.hk commented: "Since RTTY isn't a "real" mode, this should not worry most here." AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu jjreisert@alum.mit.edu commented: "Uniques _are_ remove; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00086.html (7,978 bytes)
14. [RTTY] 2001 TARA RTTY Certificate (score: 1): Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 19:09:33 -0500; Many thanks to TARA for the 1st Place, Multi Op - High Power certificate for 2001 TARA RTTY Sprint. Nothing like a certificate from the previous year's contest, received just prior to the current yea; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00112.html (6,713 bytes)
15. [RTTY] 2002 RTTY Round Up (score: 1): Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 16:03:11 -0500; Thanks to ARRL for the 1st Place, Single Operator, High Power, KY Section, certificate. Hard to believe that almost a year has passed since one of my favorite RTTY contests! I suppose, "time flies wh; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00131.html (6,407 bytes)
16. [RTTY] K4WW SOAB(A)HP (score: 1): Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 06:57:59 -0400; Another one in the log with what is becoming a far too familiar question: "anyone else NOT work KY"! High power was used on 20, 40 and 80, but most of operation on 10 and 15 was above "100", requirin; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-10/msg00005.html (8,463 bytes)
17. [RTTY] JARTS RTTY Contest October 19-20 (score: 1): Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 06:07:41 -0400; "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net> "The exchange is a simple RST and AGE." Not nearly as "simple", now that my age no longer equals the "usual contest RST"! Before you ask, I'm not "600"!! C'Ya,; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-10/msg00068.html (6,633 bytes)
18. [RTTY] SV5/G4OBK RTTY (score: 1): Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 14:50:03 -0400; Received today, direct! Ten (10) day turnaround! C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-10/msg00107.html (6,075 bytes)
19. [RTTY] CQ WW RTTY DX Contest (score: 1): Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 08:08:30 -0400; "Uli Stolz, DJ9XB" <Uli_Stolz@t-online.de> wrote: "What's about a caterory " SOAB QRP ". If adding the category will add "/QRP" to the station(s) call, then I'm against it! I have yet to receive a "l; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-09/msg00011.html (7,240 bytes)
20. [RTTY] THANKS and help ! (score: 1): Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 11:59:39 -0400; I've been trying, via bureau, since 1998, without success! Still waiting for direct, only one (1) month, so not getting excited! It still ceases to amaze me at the apparent inconsistincies of station; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-09/msg00081.html (7,687 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]