Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k4sbz.stan@gmail.com: 52 ]

Total 52 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] Kenwood TS590S (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 12:55:00 -0400
I have been using the Kenwood 590S for about three years, ever since it was introduced. I love it. It' s just as they claim -- the best rig you can get for the price. You can spend a lot more and get
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00013.html (7,868 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] To DE or not to DE (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:46:32 -0700
The problem is simple. That is a default macro in MMTTY. These people just were not in the contest. Not everyone is a contester and we have to share the band with them. Maybe they are not the problem
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00174.html (13,080 bytes)

3. [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:02:34 -0700
Some recent posts have been disturbing. Someone was upset because a 2x3 call was used to try to contact a DX station in a pileup during a contest. Well, that happens to be the F1 default in MMTTY and
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00187.html (7,730 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:33:58 -0700
Just to clarify my original post, I meant that the guys recommending efficient exchanges did not include TU in their exchange. In real life, I see many TUs and am thankful that so many of you back me
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00201.html (9,728 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] jt-65 and jt-9 frequency usage (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 23:00:23 -0400
I hope you weren't contesting on those WARC bands? Stan, K4SBZ Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mail
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00124.html (9,525 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] jt-65 and jt-9 frequency usage (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 00:11:11 -0400
The discussion was about avoiding jt-65 & jt-9 DURING CONTESTS, so I thought the comment was appropriate because those are non-contest bands. Sorry to get your dander up, John. Stan, K4SBZ Sent from
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00125.html (10,294 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] Digipan Compatibility Question (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 13:07:16 -0500
I have been running Digipan under Windows 8 without any problems. Stan, K4SBZ Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.cont
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00014.html (7,678 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] Digipan Compatibility Question (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 13:10:21 -0500
I am also running MMTTY under Windows 8. Stan, K4SBZ Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listin
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00015.html (7,219 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] New Ham (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 08:19:43 -0500
Willard, If you have the space in your attic, many of us have had great success with a 20 meter dipole in the attic. I used one for year before moving to the open spaces with no home owners assn. Sta
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00086.html (11,201 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] FREQUENCY IN USE BY ... (JT65/JT9) (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 15:39:22 -0500
Greetings to all, This forum has a very focused audience with a limited mindset, whereas the digital aspect of this hobby is very broad. (How many of you subscribe to other forums?) RTTY traditionall
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00060.html (11,872 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] FREQUENCY IN USE BY ... (JT65/JT9) (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 18:03:36 -0500
"Is there a good digital band plan?" A band plan is a "Gentlemen's Agreement" because no one owns a frequency. Therefore when a gentleman knows that a frequency is the watering hole for JT65, the gen
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00079.html (10,855 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] FREQUENCY IN USE BY ... (JT65/JT9) (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 20:22:05 -0500
That wasn't even a watering hole....that was out in the desert! ;) Stan, K4SBZ "Real radio bounces off the sky." _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00087.html (13,385 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] Roundup observations - a bit long! (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 09:26:19 -0500
The lack of DX can be explained by the propagation reports for Saturday and Sunday. They were exceptionally poor. Stan, K4SBZ "Real radio bounces off the sky." _______________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00107.html (9,334 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] FREQUENCY IN USE BY ... (JT65/JT9) (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 17:12:31 -0500
I agree that too many of the PSK31 operators are unskilled in contesting. That may be because they haven't had the opportunity to learn the techniques. Possibly, if more contests had a PSK category,
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00127.html (17,401 bytes)

15. Re: [RTTY] Roundup observations - a bit long! (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 17:22:56 -0500
Do you think the difference is that it is the AMERICAN Radio Relay League RTTY Roundup vs CQ's Worldwide contests? The perception by DX stations being that it is a US contest, rather than a WW contes
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00132.html (11,170 bytes)

16. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 134, Issue 19 (score: 1)
Author: Stan Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 18:10:46 -0500
But what if I can't listen on two frequencies at the same time? ___________________ Stan Zawrotny, K4SBZ (850) 893-5003 (h) (850) 590-6617 (m) K4SBZ.Stan@Gmail.com Real radio bounces off the sky. ___
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00137.html (21,540 bytes)

17. Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] LoTW confirmation rates (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:55:03 -0500
My experience with QSLs is that I have a 35% QSL rate per QSO with eQSL, 25% with LoTW and 4% with paper. Many of those are duplicates. I mostly work digital, using SSB only for contests. I am a firm
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00207.html (8,276 bytes)

18. Re: [RTTY] FT5ZM New (to me) Feature of Club Log (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:02:05 -0500
Oh no, has NSA taken a picture of me? Stan, K4SBZ "Real radio bounces off the sky." _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00230.html (7,673 bytes)

19. Re: [RTTY] Being the fox - pileup running (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:19:50 -0500
When I see stations operating split on digital I see so much confusion from the hams that don't know how to operate split properly that I wonder if it is worth all the QRM that it causes. Plus it tie
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00318.html (9,953 bytes)

20. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 and Atlantic Division Director (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 11:45:42 -0400
You realize that the road to becoming an ARRL official runs through ARES. Nearly all of them are former ARES Section Managers, DECs, ECs, etc. and therefore are more experienced with VHF EmComm than
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00005.html (6,867 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu