Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k4ik@subich.com: 44 ]

Total 44 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] NAQP RTTY on NCDXF Beacon] (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:16:49 -0500
Chen, That's all true ... but the new software authors do not make that clear in their documentation. Some authors stick with 2125/2295 and fail to include a "reverse" or "invert" function to put Mar
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00229.html (9,918 bytes)

22. Re: [RTTY] operator error- pse help (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:44:28 -0500
Joe, Please contact me off the list ... I have information for you but your ISP is blocking e-mail from my ISP's mail server. Unfortunately, I can no longer use any of my alternate e-mail addresses t
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00258.html (10,384 bytes)

23. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal - FCC Invites Comments (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:07:36 -0500
Jim, ARRL and others promoting regulation by bandwidth have stated that the bandwidth limits are maximum and not minimum. Thus "conventional" RTTY would receive a significant expansion in the availab
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00289.html (9,937 bytes)

24. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal - FCC Invites Comments (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:02:12 -0500
Since the original language was mine ... "Freely available" is downloadable from a central site or available for the cost of postage and media. "Working software" is software that decodes all varian
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00301.html (9,476 bytes)

25. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal - FCC Invites Comments (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:02:12 -0500
Not on your life ... 160 has had problems for 30 years (ever since LORAN sharing went away) due to incompatible operating modes and usage. There aren't enough "gentlemen" who respect "gentlemen's' ag
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00302.html (9,566 bytes)

26. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal - FCC Invites Comments (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 09:05:38 -0500
No ... protocols do not do a bit of good if a vast majority of amateurs are not software developers with access to many thousands of dollars in development tools. With analog protocols (voice, CW an
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00334.html (9,362 bytes)

27. Re: [RTTY] FT1000D tuning speed problem/question (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 13:27:14 -0500
Van, The FT-1000/FT-1000D has always had a fixed 10 KHz per revolution dial speed (100 KHz/revolution is the "fast" button is pushed). If one of your radios has a variable tuning rate, it has the Int
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00342.html (9,887 bytes)

28. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal - FCC Invites Comments (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 14:40:31 -0500
How absurd! If the average amateur cannot decode an interfering signal, how can he determine if the content is such that it NEEDS to be sent to the Commission for enforcement action (pornographic, c
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00355.html (9,862 bytes)

29. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal - FCC Invites Comments (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 15:43:13 -0500
Interference is not the only reason to refer a signal to the Commission seeking enforcement action. Unless you are advocating that the Amateur Service be turned into a quasi-commercial mobile servic
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00360.html (9,867 bytes)

30. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal - FCC Invites Comments (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:08:25 -0500
I am simply saying that in order for the Amateur Service to be effectively self- (or peer-) policing, the Commission has every right (and the duty) to permit the use of only protocols and modulation
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00368.html (10,218 bytes)

31. Re: [RTTY] uh, what about spectrum? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:59:06 -0500
Fro: Peter Laws: If you are going to change shift, why not make it 45 Hz or even 22.5 Hz (minimum shift keying) as advocated by JE3HHT? 170 Hz based on reducing the shift from 850 (170 = 850/5) as de
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00387.html (8,372 bytes)

32. Re: [RTTY] - "Freely available software" (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:59:52 -0500
Absolutely not the case ... the FCC can prohibit the use of any protocol and/or any modulation system for any reason. If they wanted to require Amateurs in the US to use only International Morse in t
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00407.html (12,838 bytes)

33. Re: [RTTY] Narrow RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 23:09:53 -0500
The STA work was all done at 200 Hz shift, 300 baud ... I was a member of that group in the mid-to late 80's. The STA was issued to ARRL and the results were the basis for the (misguided) rules that
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00408.html (7,599 bytes)

34. Re: [RTTY] Mono band amps (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 12:41:18 -0500
The tube is rated for 2 KW anode dissipation with water cooling ... perhaps a water cooling system would significantly reduce the blower noise <G>. All the switching and filtering might be an issue
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00492.html (7,978 bytes)

35. Re: [RTTY] Mono band amps (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:53:23 -0500
Not even RF detection but decoded band data and/or computer control. The decoding isn't so much the problem as the 2 of N selection matrix - particularly with the need to maintain isolation, etc. 73
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00499.html (7,518 bytes)

36. Re: [RTTY] Now this is a tad funny about LoTW (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 19:56:09 -0500
It's not "good form" but it does not cause any harm other than resetting the "QSL date" if the data happens to match the other station's entry. 73, ... Joe, W4TV _____________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00550.html (12,371 bytes)

37. Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 08:31:36 -0500
Bill, If they're in my division and they're too busy to respond to my request for a QSL, they're too busy to represent me. I'll vote against them the next time. The non-QSLers should be posted somewh
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00559.html (8,860 bytes)

38. Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:36:33 -0500
It is also relatively easy to see when a particular station last uploaded logs from the LotW "home page" ... Terry's work is nice and I hope it causes some people (both League Officials and members)
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00570.html (10,474 bytes)

39. Re: [RTTY] FT1000 Field Settings (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:23:10 -0500
John, It is likely that tone frequencies in your friend's Mark V Field do not correspond to the tones in his receive software. Assuming MMTTY: Demodulator: Mark 2125 Hz Shift 170 Hz AFC: AFC OFF (not
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00614.html (8,641 bytes)

40. Re: [RTTY] FT1000D (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:04:30 -0500
Ron, RTTY Jack: 1 FSK 2 RX Audio 3 PTT 4 Ground Packet Jack: 1 TX Audio 2 Ground 3 PTT 4 RX Audio 5 Squelch 73, ... Joe, W4TV _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@co
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00617.html (7,457 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu