Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k4dsp.doug@gmail.com: 50 ]

Total 50 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Help me decide between two rigs (score: 1)
Author: Doug Hall <k4dsp.doug@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 22:51:17 -0500
Hi All, I've been digging through the RTTY list archives but ultimately I'd like to solicit some opinions. I'm very close to buying a Yaesu FT-1000MP Mark V. A new one. I've done a lot of reading abo
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00012.html (7,155 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] TS-2000 & RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Doug Hall <k4dsp.doug@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:52:05 -0500
I have been using a TS-2000 on RTTY for several years now. I've used it in a number of RTTY contests at 100 watts with no problems at all. 73, Doug, K4DSP ____________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00234.html (9,434 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Hall" <k4dsp.doug@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:44:37 -0500
I agree about the antenna. And if you can buy an Alpha then more power to ya. Literally. But for $500 you can buy a Heathkit SB-220. Like many older amps it comes from the days when power was rated i
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00289.html (9,649 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] Computer PCI Slots (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Hall" <k4dsp.doug@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 14:21:48 -0400
Steve, I doubt if the PCI-3000 will work in any new PC since most of them don't have ISA slots. The PCI-3000 fits in an ISA slot, which is probably not present on any new PC. Even if you find a relat
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-04/msg00074.html (7,919 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] VI9NI (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Hall" <k4dsp.doug@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 00:59:03 -0400
He's been on FSK quite a lot, with usually an excellent signal even here on the east coast. He called CQ a couple of nights ago for a while with no takers. Doug, K4DSP _______________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-06/msg00028.html (6,806 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] Linux contesting software? (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Hall" <k4dsp.doug@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:08:27 -0400
As you might expect, the pickings are slimmer under Linux. But there is some software out there. TLF is a contesting program for Linux similar to TR-Log, and in fact it uses the same file format. See
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-06/msg00042.html (8,286 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] Antenna Question (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Hall" <k4dsp.doug@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 22:43:49 -0400
I agree with AA4LR on this. I had an A4S up at 70 feet for several years before losing the antenna and tower to Hurricane Fran. (Huge pine tree fell across the guy wires and brought the whole works d
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00018.html (10,205 bytes)

8. [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Hall" <k4dsp.doug@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:55:30 -0400
Hi all, I have not come to praise the horse, but to bury it :-) Actually I have a question that I have not seen addressed. I ask this, not to fan the flames, but because I think it's pertinent to the
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00385.html (7,672 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Hall" <k4dsp.doug@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 22:47:18 -0400
You mean like the separate categories we have for high and low power? Above all else I think we should be consistent. As you said earlier, radios and antennas are just tools, and "Why should it be a
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00418.html (10,241 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] Tuner for High Power RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Hall" <k4dsp.doug@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:55:06 -0400
Rick, The XMatch from N4XM will handle it, but it's pretty pricey. If you don't have a wide range of impedances to match I would suggest purchasing a vacuum variable and a large edge-wound inductor a
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00564.html (8,112 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Screwed by FCC? (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Hall" <k4dsp.doug@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 16:19:27 -0400
Bill, RTTY isn't a digital mode? Why are you dragging the start and stop bits into it? The fact that digital information is sent asynchronously has nothing to do with it. The 5 bit code patterns sent
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00130.html (10,990 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] RTTY and the IC 7000 (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Hall" <k4dsp.doug@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 00:38:30 -0500
John, The Icom, like most 100w solid state rigs, is rated at 40w on AM not because of duty cycle, but because of the method of amplitude modulation employed by these rigs. If the AM carrier power was
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-11/msg00061.html (8,766 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] Have RTTY ops become SSB ops? (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Hall" <k4dsp.doug@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:41:46 -0500
This seems to come up on all the various mailing lists somewhat periodically. RTTY (or CW or SSB or whatever) just isn't what it used to be, the Americans (or Europeans or whoever) are rude cretins a
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-12/msg00060.html (8,527 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] More on tthe "gripe" (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Hall" <k4dsp.doug@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:33:43 -0500
And I respectfully disagree with you. Taking it to the limit, what if everyone spotted all S&P QSOs? You say that "you can filter out most of the unwanted spots" but that's like saying "if you don't
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00321.html (10,073 bytes)

15. [RTTY] Help with Cub Scout demo (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Hall" <k4dsp.doug@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 14:36:00 -0500
Hi RTTY folks, Tomorrow evening (Monday Feb 5 EST) I have a group of cub scouts coming to my house to learn a bit about Amateur Radio. While nearly all of these kids are computer literate, they are n
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00022.html (7,962 bytes)

16. [RTTY] Thanks for the offers to help demo ham radio (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Hall" <k4dsp.doug@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 01:13:29 -0500
Hi RTTYers, Thanks to those of you who volunteered to help demonstrate amateur radio to the cub scout troop that visited my shack this evening. I ended up with 12 kids and 6 adults, so it was pretty
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00040.html (6,979 bytes)

17. Re: [RTTY] FT-920 & RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Hall" <k4dsp.doug@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 11:50:24 -0500
Dick, My understanding is that on the FT-920, DATA/LSB is FSK only, while DATA/USB is used for AFSK. That's why you get a solid mark tone in DATA/LSB. I don't know why you aren't getting anything whe
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00045.html (7,053 bytes)

18. Re: [RTTY] RTTY is getting lower and lower in frequency on 20meters. (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Hall" <k4dsp.doug@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:42:27 -0500
Bill, you paint with a broad brush. Many of us who enjoy PSK31 *do* sometimes run with wide bandwidths, but we understand AGC and dynamic range as well as you do, thank you very much. And we're not w
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00181.html (9,257 bytes)

19. Re: [RTTY] Improving receiving performance (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Hall" <k4dsp.doug@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:03:48 -0500
Given the DSP horsepower of the current generation computing platforms (dual core gigahertz plus CPUs) and the 32 bit DSPs used in the current crop of radios there is absolutely no reason I can see t
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00300.html (7,562 bytes)

20. Re: [RTTY] Palstar AT-AUTO 1.5KW Automatic Antenna Tuner (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Hall" <k4dsp.doug@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:52:41 -0500
Well then there is an inconsistency in their "AT-AUTO Theory of Operation" manual where it states: "This is the ONLY fully-automatic antenna tuner purposefully designed and built to conservatively ha
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00437.html (8,044 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu