Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k3mm@verizon.net: 71 ]

Total 71 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [RTTY] TARA 2008 "Grid Dip PSK/RTTY Shindig" Contest (score: 1)
Author: <k3mm@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:48:34 -0500 (CDT)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but this is not a VHF or UHF contest....HF + 6 meters? Ty K3MM _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.c
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-07/msg00170.html (7,964 bytes)

42. [RTTY] Volta Contest plaque received (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler Stewart"<k3mm@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:08:39 -0400
Thanks to I2DMI for the 2008 Volta plaque for North America! 73, Ty K3MM _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/list
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-10/msg00227.html (6,675 bytes)

43. Re: [RTTY] MM in RU (score: 1)
Author: k3mm@verizon.net
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:15:43 -0600 (CST)
Actually, I think MM in RU would help get more guys off of 20 meters to work the other bands, so if anything 20M crowding would improve. I'm all for anything that increases "other band" activity! Ty
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00092.html (8,453 bytes)

44. Re: [RTTY] High Speed RTTY again (score: 1)
Author: k3mm@verizon.net
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:33:34 -0600 (CST)
One thing to keep in mind with a pair of 250hz filters is that if the passbands arent perfectly aligned, you get less than 250hz, and I've seen these filters be as much as 100hz off spec. I cant unde
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00444.html (8,022 bytes)

45. Re: [RTTY] Really (score: 1)
Author: k3mm@verizon.net
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:10:01 -0600 (CST)
3: Use spaces to seperate your numbers, ex: 599 001 001 There is no real reason to use hyphens. Do not use periods, commas, slant bars. In RTTY it is preferable to send the 3 digits, it's easier to
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00467.html (11,737 bytes)

46. [RTTY] Was Re: Re: XE contest @ 75 baud ... now Next Gen digital front end software! (score: 1)
Author: k3mm@verizon.net
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:15:34 -0600 (CST)
No, what it really needs is a next generation piece of software that will parallel decode multiple formats and speeds across an entire band. We have had CW skimmer for several years now...it's time f
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00036.html (9,707 bytes)

47. Re: [RTTY] SO2R in WPX RTTY (score: 1)
Author: k3mm@verizon.net
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:52:42 -0600 (CST)
Well, I think you have to understand that usually in SO2R you can set up a rythym and it appears seamless. However, when someone you are working gets long winded or you need a repeat it's easy to get
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00148.html (11,595 bytes)

48. Re: [RTTY] Cherry Picking Calls by RUN Stations (score: 1)
Author: k3mm@verizon.net
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:26:22 -0600 (CST)
Dick I think you are mistaking an operating mistake for a technique! That's what happens when you try to send an exchange without having a callsign loaded in the callsign field! Ask me how I know ;)
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00166.html (10,966 bytes)

49. Re: [RTTY] Field Day RTTY (score: 1)
Author: k3mm@verizon.net
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 23:49:11 -0500 (CDT)
It's impossible to justify a digital station at a competitive low TX count station. The rates just wont be good enough. Once you hit double digits, it makes more sense. RTTY/digital doesnt have to ta
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-04/msg00052.html (8,632 bytes)

50. Re: [RTTY] Field Day RTTY (score: 1)
Author: k3mm@verizon.net
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 23:53:54 -0500 (CDT)
If you are going to go digital, be sure and run PSK as well. FD has far more PSK activity than RTTY. Ty K3MM Our group will be running RTTY during Field Day this year. Philip ________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-04/msg00053.html (7,842 bytes)

51. [RTTY] Dayton activities? (score: 1)
Author: k3mm@verizon.net
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 09:17:01 -0500 (CDT)
I'll be attending Dayton for the first time in many years. Any special events/gatherings in the digital world? Ty K3MM _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contestin
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-05/msg00041.html (6,803 bytes)

52. Re: [RTTY] Disturbing Observations (score: 1)
Author: k3mm@verizon.net
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:33:05 -0500 (CDT)
All this brings up some good (or bad) points but also invites dangerous false speculation and extrapolation. Sure, when you actually find a station with two signals on the band consistently calling C
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00187.html (14,856 bytes)

53. Re: [RTTY] Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: k3mm@verizon.net
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:02:06 -0500 (CDT)
I'm surprised one hasnt been written yet for the digital modes, but I guess there isnt much monetary incentive to do so since you wont sell many copies. FYI, the $500 RFSpace SDR-IQ works fine for 20
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00271.html (10,452 bytes)

54. [RTTY] W6WRT is correct... (score: 1)
Author: k3mm@verizon.net
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:50:04 -0500 (CDT)
It's HIS reflector. If you dont like it, start a new one that has a moderator. It's free! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00284.html (7,891 bytes)

55. [RTTY] Please stop the SO2R banter (score: 1)
Author: k3mm@verizon.net
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 12:58:30 -0500 (CDT)
I think we can all agree that SOnR operation has an advantage over SO1R. It would be stupid to think otherwise. We can all argue about what to do about it depending on our point of view. That has bee
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00335.html (6,821 bytes)

56. Re: [RTTY] FLDigi vs MMTTY? (score: 1)
Author: k3mm@verizon.net
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 06:36:43 -0500 (CDT)
I havent done anything scientific yet, but I like MMTTY better so far on RTTY. The AFC on Fldigi is way too slow for one thing. Fldigi is much better for PSK than MMVARI as it has much better paralle
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00370.html (8,841 bytes)

57. [RTTY] ARRL Field Day this weekend - W3AO digital station "EU" activity hours (score: 1)
Author: k3mm@verizon.net
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:14:41 -0500 (CDT)
This weekend is the ARRL Field Day which starts at 18Z on Saturday the 26th and ends by 21Z on Sunday. For digital QSOs only, I will be making a special effort at W3AO in Maryland to beam Northeast t
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00385.html (7,432 bytes)

58. [RTTY] Macro economics! ...was Re: Re: K or carriage return (score: 1)
Author: k3mm@verizon.net
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:10:30 -0600 (CST)
Ahh yes, so efficiency means different things for different people, stations, conditions, etc. Obviously the goal is to complete QSOs as quickly as possible with 100 percent accuracy. How you get the
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00185.html (10,301 bytes)

59. Re: [RTTY] Which logger sends "Now <nextcall>..." (score: 1)
Author: k3mm@verizon.net
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:17:43 -0600 (CST)
That's probably N1MM. {LogthenGrab} or LogThenPop functions depending on where it's storing up the callsigns. This concept has been around since WF1B's RTTY program, but it wasnt nearly as easy to us
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00186.html (8,632 bytes)

60. Re: [RTTY] Macro economics! ...was Re: Re: K or carriage return (score: 1)
Author: k3mm@verizon.net
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:23:56 -0600 (CST)
Sorry, I misposted this as it really belongs in the n1mm-digital forum, but the generalities still apply. 73, Ty K3MM Ahh yes, so efficiency means different things for different people, stations, con
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00205.html (11,062 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu