Mail Archive Search: <+from:k3mm@comcast.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:k3mm@comcast.net: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Should NCJ continue the RTTY Sprints? (score: 1): Author: k3mm@comcast.net (Tyler Stewart); Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 22:27:43 -0500; I havent been very active on RTTY lately, but I'd hate to see the RTTY Sprint go...it's a very unique and exciting contest. I'm not surprised that the log count is very low...the same is true of the; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00207.html (9,177 bytes)
2. [RTTY] RTTY operation in ARRL's Field Day exercise? (score: 1): Author: k3mm@comcast.net (k3mm@comcast.net); Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 19:29:08 -0400; I had the rather distinct displeasure of doing all the digital operation at our field day this year. I was very disappointed in that there was very little RTTY activity on any band but 20 meters, yet; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-06/msg00246.html (10,397 bytes)
3. [RTTY] UBN analysis (score: 1): Author: k3mm@comcast.net (k3mm@comcast.net); Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 00:45:24 -0400; In a perfect log checking world, that would happen. This is the world of "whatever the computer says, goes"... Therefore, even if 500 guys copied RW9WA sending Zone 17, it's still their fault and I g; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00124.html (10,792 bytes)
4. [RTTY] My thoughts on the UBN's (score: 1): Author: k3mm@comcast.net (k3mm@comcast.net); Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 01:25:32 -0400; Common misconception: CQ is running the contests. Truth: CQ has NOTHING TO DO with running ANY of their contests. CQ Contests are all run by volunteers and sometimes you get a lot more than what you; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00127.html (8,011 bytes)
5. [RTTY] Complaints against Contest Management (score: 1): Author: k3mm@comcast.net (k3mm@comcast.net); Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 10:37:21 -0400; I think this whole debate has gotten a bit out of control. Typically, the sponsor will publish results in their publication first. After that all contest results, including those that they couldnt fi; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00318.html (10,922 bytes)
6. RE: [RTTY] FT-1000MP owners I need help... (score: 1): Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 23:09:23 -0500; The FT990 is exactly the same hook up as a 1000 or 1000 MP and what you say is correct and exactly how I do it. As noted by WA9ALS, in PACKET mode you must supply PTT to key the radio. VOX is INOP. T; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-11/msg00173.html (8,674 bytes)
7. [RTTY] FW: RTTY Roundup K3MM Single Op HP (score: 1): Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 23:31:07 -0600; ARRL RTTY Roundup Call: K3MM Operator(s): K3MM Station: K3MM Class: Single Op HP QTH: MD Operating Time (hrs): 11 Radios: SO2R Summary: Band QSOs -- 80: 172 40: 296 20: 348 15: 278 10: 6 -- Total: 11; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00051.html (7,131 bytes)
8. RE: [RTTY] N6HC having problems with WF1B - please help (score: 1): Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 17:45:47 -0600; If you check the rtty.ini file, it usually has a MAXQSO? statement that allocates memory for that many QSO's. You just have to up the number...it may default to 1000. Too late now, but there is a uti; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00082.html (9,551 bytes)
9. RE: [RTTY] Ritty with Writelog (score: 1): Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 17:51:15 -0600; Didnt he have a special version for Writelog users? Ty K3MM I think maybe 3.5 works, but definitely not 2... to _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com h; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00084.html (8,784 bytes)
10. RE: [RTTY] Don't send IN during the exchange! (score: 1): Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 18:01:44 -0600; Heh heh... yet another reason NOT to use Writelog for RTTY contests.... WF1B doesnt have such problems... Ty K3MM send -- Good point, but I worked at least a hundred guys who didn't send "de" at all; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00085.html (9,690 bytes)
11. RE: [RTTY] Don't send IN during the exchange! (score: 1): Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 18:23:29 -0600; Heck ,I'm still running a 486 and Pentium 150 on my ham station! Plenty of power for WF1B and RITTY! hi hi! Ty K3MM Heh heh, and neither does Writelog as it uses the rtty.dta file as does WF1B. Howev; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00091.html (11,191 bytes)
12. [RTTY] FW: RTTY Roundup K3MM Single Op HP (score: 1): Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 02:30:45 -0500; ARRL RTTY Roundup Call: K3MM Operator(s): K3MM Station: K3MM Class: Single Op HP QTH: MD Operating Time (hrs): 3.5 Radios: SO2R Summary: Band QSOs -- 80: 30 40: 75 20: 166 15: 134 10: 0 -- Total: 405; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00122.html (7,614 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] MMTTY & CABRILLO (score: 1): Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:44:15 -0500; You probably fixed this already, but remove "ROUND UP" from the end of the CONTEST: and everything should fall into place. It should be just" ARRL-RTTY". Ty K3MM -- Original Message -- From: "Robert; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00165.html (11,076 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] PSK Info (score: 1): Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 18:18:08 -0500; Say it aint so! hi! I havent run PSK/RTTY from DX since '01, but PSK sucked. It is slow and the operators are even slower and clueless. Ty K3MM -- Original Message -- From: <K4FJ@aol.com> To: <RTTY@c; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00199.html (8,087 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] PSK Info (score: 1): Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:18:06 -0500; I'm not saying it's a not a cool mode from a purely technical aspect, and I've enjoyed that part of it the few times I've used it. Even cooler is WSJT on VHF...but it's REALLY slow. If you need it to; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00210.html (9,870 bytes)
16. [RTTY] Fw: NAQP RTTY K3MM Single Op HP (score: 1): Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:14:26 -0500; I think 10 meters was a big disappointment for most...I think I only completed 2 passes, and they were fairly local. As usual from the right coast, we are playing catchup to the band propagation for; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00496.html (7,805 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] FSK and ft-1000mp (score: 1): Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:16:12 -0500; OH boy....here we go again! Ty K3MM Hi all, I have one question (after I worked out a bunch of problems myself). I have gotten fsk working on my ft1000mp but I need to know if I should have the Menu; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-03/msg00070.html (7,902 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] FSK and ft-1000mp (score: 1): Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 16:23:53 -0500; Good tip! Thanks, Jerry. Ty K3MM _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-03/msg00095.html (10,927 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] NA RTTY Sprint - win all you can as fast as you can (score: 1): Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 16:46:10 -0500; Dont do that! The Sprint is probably the toughest contest because of the QSY rule, but everybody makes a lot ofmistakes the first few times. Come back next time...we need the stations! I'd like to se; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-03/msg00106.html (9,105 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] Olivia's beauty... (score: 1): Author: k3mm@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:27:49 +0000; Ahh... OK, well that's sounding better at least...still slow for contesting (what else is there??) How hard is it to tune in manually, or how fast does it lock on for an autotune? Ty K3MM -- Original; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-03/msg00115.html (13,060 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]