Mail Archive Search: <+from:k0rc@pclink.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:k0rc@pclink.com: 65 ]

Total 65 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [RTTY] LCR 2008 RTTY RU (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:19:20 -0500; "Or, if you are using N1MM, forget to log the contact, and move the VFO, it erases the contact. I've had that happen before 73 Tom W7WHY" Tom, Similar to WriteLog, the N1MM program has the {LOG} comm; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-07/msg00188.html (7,638 bytes)
42. [RTTY] RTTY High Speed Sprint? (was: Ahh, the sound!!) (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:36:40 -0500; "...Also, why do we still stick to 45 Bauds? Why not try 75 Bauds for a change. I have had a few Q's at that speed but nobody has suggested changing up to 75 as a modern standard, quite easy in MMTTY; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00057.html (17,328 bytes)
43. Re: [RTTY] Why QR for the section???? (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 23:52:27 -0500; And trying to remember all that while in the heat of battle is not necessary when using N1MM. Look at the top of the RX window and you will see a single line, split pane window. When you put your cur; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00201.html (9,610 bytes)
44. Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 14:03:52 -0500; Merci Claude! You're absolutely right. The confirmation macro (usually F3) should start with either TU or QSL and then whatever the operator deems "important". {TX} TU {CALL} {MYCALL} CQ {RX} That's; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00244.html (11,459 bytes)
45. Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 14:31:03 -0500; Whoa! This message got out of the gate before I was finished reading all the queued messages! I see there is some debate about the {CALL} in the macro string I suggested. My thought is {CALL} is impo; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00247.html (13,041 bytes)
46. Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:33:17 -0500; Yes, I adopted the method you describe for the F2 exchange (their call at the beginning and end of the report sent to them). But then I also include their call in my confirmation message as well. It'; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00252.html (15,770 bytes)
47. Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:35:32 -0500; Remember what? 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00271.html (9,114 bytes)
48. Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:16:48 -0500; Heh heh heh... Well I, for one, know that AA5AU will send LA 04 and W7AY will send OR 03 even before the contest begins! I don't need a SCP database to tell me this. And BTW, it was a conscious decis; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00312.html (12,573 bytes)
49. Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:04:10 -0500; CQ has made their determination that CW Skimmer will put you into the Assisted category. 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com h; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00324.html (10,736 bytes)
50. Re: [RTTY] Fairness (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:30:28 -0500; "I also thing the FD and SS exchange should be reversed." 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN I think everyone should be limited to a 35' high antenna like me. It is totally unfair that people get to call CQ and; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-10/msg00006.html (7,961 bytes)
51. [RTTY] CQ Magazine / CQ WW RTTY results (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 22:20:04 -0500; CROSS-POSTED TO EXTEND THE SEARCH AUDIENCE Rag, The first two years of the CQWW RTTY contest were promoted by Dale Sinner, W6IWO and sponsored jointly by the RTTY Journal and 73 Magazine. The contest; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-10/msg00041.html (9,518 bytes)
52. Re: [RTTY] CQ Magazine / CQ WW RTTY results (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 11:10:55 -0500; Thanks for the update Jay, Yeah, if I was thinking properly (getting harder every day), I don't think the contest would have been called the "CQ World Wide" before CQ actually picked it up! As I ment; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-10/msg00043.html (12,828 bytes)
53. Re: [RTTY] Fw: [Acg] Chance for Input on Proposed Rule Changes for CQWPX Contests (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 15:02:02 -0500; I would hope so. That second receiver is certainly "Skimmer-like technology", affording alerting assistance of any kind. 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN _______________________________________________ RTTY ma; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-10/msg00066.html (11,494 bytes)
54. Re: [RTTY] up date LoTW confirmed (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 21:13:20 -0500; I think you guys are just going to have to request a new vanity callsign and start all over! :-) 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN I have the same problem, Dick. I sent E-mail to the webmaster a week or two ago; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-10/msg00140.html (8,340 bytes)
55. Re: [RTTY] Looking for resources: log analysis, RFI solutions (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:12:53 -0600; SH5 is a great tool, especially for DX contests. Last year I developed an Excel spreadsheet specifically to analyze the ARRL Sweepstakes contest. You can download a copy here: http://chudek.aberon.ne; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00099.html (10,391 bytes)
56. Re: [RTTY] 160 (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:42:19 -0600; And the reason for 0 contacts on 160 by these stations is most likely based upon the rule that multipliers count only once, regardless of which band they are work on. In addition, in a contest you wi; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00176.html (9,365 bytes)
57. Re: [RTTY] ARRL RTTY Roundup and the "Triple Play Award" (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 01:32:23 -0600; 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-12/msg00023.html (10,341 bytes)
58. Re: [RTTY] ARRL RTTY Roundup and the "Triple Play Award" (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:55:34 -0600; Thanks for the solution, Joe. I do have different accounts setup for different locations but never extended the concept to a date range. 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN The easiest way to handle the Triple Pl; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-12/msg00041.html (11,060 bytes)
59. Re: [RTTY] FSK interface circuit troubles (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 22:54:04 -0600; Al, A USB to Serial converter is a hit-or-mis proposition. Many of them do not provide enough current on the control signals to drive a transistor. If you have a 'real' COM port to make the connectio; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-12/msg00147.html (12,346 bytes)
60. Re: [RTTY] OK RTTY VE3GSI SOAB LP (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 23:21:51 -0600; Eric, Hmmm... I worked a station giving out Zone 6, but there was no way he was in Mexico with the callsign he was using. I questioned him about it and asked what state he was in. I gave him the corr; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-12/msg00252.html (8,437 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]