Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k.alexander@rogers.com: 35 ]

Total 35 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] The 10-Meter RTTY Contest this weekend (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 20:49:43 -0500
Heh heh! Sorry, I should have mentioned, I will keep my rig on 28085 and will call CQ there as well on the hour. Ken VE3HLS _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@cont
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-12/msg00011.html (11,597 bytes)

22. Re: [RTTY] The 10-Meter RTTY Contest this weekend (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 21:32:29 -0500
It's a shame the day's activity doesn't translate into to evening activity on 40m. I just tuned around and found no RTTY signals at all. Must be contesting hangover or something! 73, Ken Alexander VE
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-12/msg00012.html (7,331 bytes)

23. Re: [RTTY] 10 meter contest (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 06:39:55 -0500
Well, here I am sitting in front of my radio since 1115 UTC and barely anything heard. I have heard, and seen on the waterfall, the weakest traces of RTTY and have heard occasional strong bursts via
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-12/msg00014.html (8,049 bytes)

24. [RTTY] VE3HLS 10-RTTY Contest Summary (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:30:47 -0500
10-RTTY Score Summary Sheet Start Date : 2011-12-04 CallSign Used : VE3HLS Operator(s) : VE3HLS Operator Category : SINGLE-OP Band : 10M Power : LOW Mode : RTTY Default Exchange : ON Gridsquare : FN0
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-12/msg00031.html (7,166 bytes)

25. Re: [RTTY] Re the 10m RTTY contest (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:52:43 -0500
Either that or they will be submitting check logs as (I think) was mentioned in the rules. 73, Ken Alexander VE3HLS _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.c
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-12/msg00041.html (9,126 bytes)

26. Re: [RTTY] Re the 10m RTTY contest (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 20:12:44 -0500
What I love most about 10m contests, RTTY, CW or whatever, is that you can get a good night's sleep knowing you won't have missed anything (much)! 73, Ken Alexander VE3HLS ___________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-12/msg00057.html (9,419 bytes)

27. Re: [RTTY] tara and 10 meter (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 00:37:41 -0500
I'd have been delighted to work him, proper exchange or not. I've never worked Guam...never even heard anything from there. He wouldn't even have to QSL...as long as I could put him in my log! 73 - K
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-12/msg00061.html (7,734 bytes)

28. Re: [RTTY] ZK2V on 40-meters (score: 1)
Author: k.alexander@rogers.com
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:25:55 +0000
I always wondered if I'd live long enough to hear "VKs" and "shooting fish in a barrel" used in the same sentence! :-) Luckily, working ZK2V was that easy for me during the ARRL 10m contest. Got 'em
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-12/msg00109.html (11,315 bytes)

29. Re: [RTTY] Take Two RTTY Exchange (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 15:52:11 -0500
Hi Gary, I never understood how the decision was made to let hams take their calls with them when they move to a different call district. Was it an admission the FCC didn't have resources to administ
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-01/msg00173.html (11,700 bytes)

30. Re: [RTTY] Rude contesters (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 18:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
So does LISTENING first.  But that requires a tiny amount of courtesy and a few extra seconds out of your life.  The way RTTY contesters fret about shaving a few milliseconds off their macros, you'd
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-09/msg00187.html (10,656 bytes)

31. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013 (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 23:02:36 -0500
It's not archaic, it's logical. Canada, Australia and the U.S. are large countries, so part of the challenge of working all call districts means that you managed to hit all corners of a country the s
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00033.html (9,209 bytes)

32. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013 (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 13:47:16 -0800 (PST)
ORIGINAL REPLY: It baffles me why the FCC bothers with call districts at all. At one time before the advent of computers and instant data transfer I suppose it made sense but those days are long gone
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00055.html (9,443 bytes)

33. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013 (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 14:46:57 -0800 (PST)
Simple.  Stick with what you had. You report any moves to another call district, just like you do with your drivers license when you move to a new state, right?  The FCC issues you with a call for th
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00060.html (10,013 bytes)

34. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013 (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 16:06:41 -0800 (PST)
Thanks Iain, Point taken.  However, it adds strength to BARTG's argument for the additional identification by U.S. hams in their contest. 73, Ken Alexander VE3HLS ________________________________ Fro
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00068.html (11,890 bytes)

35. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013 (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 23:14:44 -0500
Geez Bill, where are you getting this from? I was pretty careful to keep my discussion about moving from one call district to another. Nobody suggested 50 call districts or thousands based on countie
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00081.html (11,765 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 35
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu