Mail Archive Search: <+from:john@wa9als.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:john@wa9als.com: 83 ]

Total 83 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [RTTY] FW: wf1b software (score: 1): Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 16:23:15 -0400; MMTTY and N1MM or WriteLog. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00113.html (10,140 bytes)
62. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the ANTENNA OVERKILL horse... (score: 1): Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:30:58 -0400; Welcome! You can count on this discussion once or twice a year. The arguments are the same, just a few new participants in the discussion each year. It's a flawed situation with no perfect answers. W; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00214.html (9,863 bytes)
63. Re: [RTTY] Level Playing Field is unrealistic (score: 1): Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 19:37:37 -0400; Sort of. But I would say: "I did 50% better than last year, so I won!" And when I was a complete beginner, things like "learn from the pros" and 'It's better to soar with eagles then..." came to mind; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00302.html (8,329 bytes)
64. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1): Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:02:27 -0400; -- Original Message -- This is what is -really- sad. The above was received in a private mail from someone that aspires to be better at RTTY contesting, but is being turned off by the nature of the d; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00308.html (10,008 bytes)
65. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1): Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:40:46 -0400; I think the main problem is that the discussion has been had sooo many times over several years. Nothing changes - The arguments are the same every year. There are probably some reflector trolls that; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00315.html (11,189 bytes)
66. [RTTY] One more (score: 1): Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 09:29:59 -0400; I have to ask on the way out, has anyone noticed what happened to this "discussion" on SSB and CW? Did they even have it? Are they hurting for participation? Do the guys on CW have more money?? _____; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00356.html (6,321 bytes)
67. Re: [RTTY] PK9000 (score: 1): Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 07:52:42 -0400; The PK-900 manual is at http://www.w5sdc.net/w3mrc/packet/AEA_PK-900_manual.pdf Be patient - He must be on a slow connection, but less than 5 min. This page shows the connections of a PK-232MBX to a; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-08/msg00114.html (7,456 bytes)
68. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1): Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 12:34:26 -0400; Everyone seems to avoid directly answering the question, "Then what about antennas etc?" Any knowledgeable ham would have to admit that antennas are more important than power, yet we have a power ca; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00133.html (9,286 bytes)
69. [RTTY] SO1U Re: CQ-Contest SO2R (Longish,but (I think) Scintillating) (score: 1): Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:50:36 -0400; Really. Let's face it - Whatever tools the winners are using, within the rules mind you, some people will be trying to limit. I think we should have a 1-urinal class myself! The guys with 2 or more u; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00198.html (7,543 bytes)
70. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1): Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:54:40 -0400; Gosh, I thought I was on 75 meters with Shelby having started the troll and Bill being the band cop! 73 - John, WA9ALS _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contestin; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00250.html (9,146 bytes)
71. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1): Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:58:38 -0400; Not a bad idea - Would probably make for a lot more home-brew amps! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00253.html (8,958 bytes)
72. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1): Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:54:59 -0400; That pretty much says it all, folks. As far as I know, in several years, this reflector has basically NOT been moderated. I did it for awhile, AD1C did it for awhile, and others before us, and we ju; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00264.html (9,684 bytes)
73. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1): Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 22:02:40 -0400; Bill - That's ridiculous. There are a lot of gizmos out there - SO2R switches, Rigblasters etc. BUT YOU DON'T NEED ANY OF THOSE TO OPERATE SO2R! My SO2R "interface" was 2 transistors and 4 resistors; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00265.html (8,716 bytes)
74. Re: [RTTY] Soundcard Query (score: 1): Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 06:47:56 -0400; I believe the -1 setting in MMTTY indicates "use the first one you find". As Phil said, otherwise it's a trial and error process of finding the desired one, but it should be between -2 and +2. John,; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00263.html (7,675 bytes)
75. Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs (score: 1): Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 21:16:22 -0400; Ed, you hit on the most amazing thing. The main objectors to SO2R not being in a different category have never tried it. If they had, I think the objections would stop. John, WA9ALS _________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00293.html (10,090 bytes)
76. Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs (score: 1): Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 06:38:40 -0400; Uh, remember David and Goliath? And David only had one slingshot. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rt; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00310.html (10,655 bytes)
77. Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs (score: 1): Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 06:42:48 -0400; 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN -- So by your argument, just take the top (10? 100?) out of each contest and make them operate in their own category next time. Why pick on the 2nd radio? If you just wa; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00311.html (9,228 bytes)
78. Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs (score: 1): Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 06:44:18 -0400; Hear ye, hear ye, Forsooth! His Majesty has ordered to make this comparison relevant and fair, it is hereby proclaimed this duel before us will be carried out using single-shot, muzzle loaders. Firea; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00312.html (9,281 bytes)
79. Re: [RTTY] ubuntu linux (score: 1): Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>; Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 15:50:53 -0400; LinPSK also does RTTY. If you can figure out the com ports, it should work for you. John WA9ALS _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.cont; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00507.html (7,928 bytes)
80. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Roundup - PSK ?? (score: 1): Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 19:49:51 -0500; "Weakest of the weak"..... Uh, Barry, I seem to remember that you operated PSK ....using 1000W! ;-) Sorry, couldn't resist! 73, John WA9ALS _______________________________________________ RTTY mailin; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00223.html (8,523 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]