Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:john@bordertech.co.uk: 84 ]

Total 84 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [RTTY] WAE Macros (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 13:14:44 -0500
than a second. Thom, that's not right. Normal RTTY speed is 45.45 baud, 60 WPM. 45 letters a second would be about 6 times as fast. John GW4SKA Yep I changed it back. 599 it is. But I still think I
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00020.html (9,466 bytes)

42. Re: [RTTY] WAE Macros (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 18:10:47 -0500
Tim, I was too annoyed to write anything rational here, so mailed Thom direct with this: ' The way I see it, the reflector is to encourage RTTY operation, answer questions and be a place to share kno
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00030.html (8,852 bytes)

43. Re: [RTTY] Stupid QTC question (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 13:08:02 -0500
QTC buckets very welcome! There's nothing in the rules about any limits. John GW4SKA If I jump into the WAE contest late, I realize I'm constrained from sending QTC traffic by the number of QSOs I've
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00048.html (7,955 bytes)

44. [RTTY] WAEDC RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2016 08:57:47 -0500
Where are the 2015 WAEDC RTTY results viewable? John GW4SKA _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00058.html (6,176 bytes)

45. Re: [RTTY] Fw: Can,t receive QTC's and condx horrible (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 09:54:22 -0500
Happening to me too. As soon as I click on a received QTC the yellow bar comes up and the screen locks. Complete pain! Setup somewhere? John GW4SKA/GW0A N1MM+ locked up on me once last night when try
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00085.html (12,749 bytes)

46. Re: [RTTY] n00b help: WAE exchange (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 19:10:39 -0500
Hi Mike, If you are CQing the report would be better as: <hiscall> RST SEQ SEQ You don't need to waste time sending your call again .. he knows it already. Then when you have his report: TU DE <my ca
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00103.html (8,121 bytes)

47. Re: [RTTY] The Road to the Roundup (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 14:52:01 -0500
Looking forward to it, but especially because I need AK on 40M and WY on 15M for RTTY WAS on those bands. Maybe this time? Cheers John GW4SKA/GW0A hey Diddlers - The countdown to the RTTY Roundup nex
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-12/msg00010.html (8,292 bytes)

48. Re: [RTTY] Ten Meter Contest (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 17:51:55 -0500
Ed, Mike, Watch this space. Simone will be announcing the new rules very soon. They address the problem of SO1R being forced to compete with the SO2R experts, Very welcome too .. I have spent years b
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-12/msg00098.html (10,452 bytes)

49. Re: [RTTY] MMTTY Strange display (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 18:52:53 -0500
Same here. 2Tone printed fine but MMTTY had transposed letters in callsigns received. Never seen that before. John GW4SKA I saw the same transposed behavior several times during the contest. At first
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-01/msg00026.html (9,008 bytes)

50. Re: [RTTY] [RBN-OPS] Re: Multiple spots RTTY [3 Attachments] (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2017 17:41:28 -0500
Definitely can happen from overdriven AFSK. I have seen it on my own spots when I had a soundcard driver problem. The windows mixer showed normal audio levels but the actual output was 100%. John GW4
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00020.html (11,558 bytes)

51. [RTTY] SDRPlay with N1MM+ (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 12:23:37 -0500
Is it possible to use N1MM+ with a transceiver (TS590SG) and use an SDRPlay as a second receiver? The SDR works fine from the 590 antenna loop-through and talks to the 590 via Omnirig, but how can I
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00031.html (7,171 bytes)

52. Re: [RTTY] Propagation (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 06:10:06 -0500
Yes, a 'dead' band could be no prop or no ops. It's always worth firing out a few CQs and watching the RBN .. much more certain than any forecast. John GW4SKA Yes, we get "propagation" and "activity"
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00068.html (9,005 bytes)

53. Re: [RTTY] callsign/callsign DQ (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 18:07:55 -0500
carefully and disqualified if any prohibited third party communication is discovered. If the entry is single operator by NY6DX it's probably OK (except for the "unstable call"). That was a Multi-Sing
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00123.html (9,169 bytes)

54. [RTTY] FW: callsign/callsign DQ (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 18:16:14 -0500
Getting in to all this legality stuff with the licence conditions is for the contest adjudicators, not the crowd here. One sure rule in any contest is that you must use the same call all the way thro
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00124.html (9,240 bytes)

55. Re: [RTTY] N3FJP log (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 09:06:24 -0500
Difficult without a bit more information. Is this your log? What software? Or are you looking at a log posted somewhere? John GW4SKA Can someone tell me why the N3FJP contest log didn't total the QSO
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00132.html (7,348 bytes)

56. Re: [RTTY] The weekend after a major contest (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 14:14:48 -0500
Listening to CW ops right through all the RTTY sections, while trying to find some RTTY to set up a receiver! John GW4SKA Hello fellow rtty fanatics After last weekends major contest I'm interested i
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00156.html (7,773 bytes)

57. Re: [RTTY] Greater than 600 watts for RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 19:49:22 -0500
Better antennas should always come before more power or a new radio with more knobs. John GW4SKA I have been thinking a lot about buying some form of amp for my shack to do 400-600 watts on RTTY. The
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-03/msg00101.html (11,543 bytes)

58. Re: [RTTY] greater than 600 watts for RTTY? (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 20:05:07 -0500
It's a good question. Looking at the replies there are plenty running 600W or more in the USA. Why not, when your licence allows it? Is it necessary for RTTY? No, not at all, unless you want to be in
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-03/msg00102.html (10,569 bytes)

59. Re: [RTTY] greater than 600 watts for RTTY? (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:59:14 +0100
Agreed. We are up against the other Europeans who have much higher power limits (or none) and the Southern Europe / North Africa super stations. John GW4SKA -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REP
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-03/msg00112.html (10,628 bytes)

60. Re: [RTTY] BARTG January Sprint Results now live. (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:57:26 +0100
Please note that the results may be subject to revision, as some experts appear to be in the wrong classes. Simone M0BOX, the BARTG contest manager, will let you know soon. John GW4SKA The link provi
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-04/msg00026.html (8,983 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
This search system is powered by Namazu