Mail Archive Search: <+from:iw1ayd@googlemail.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:iw1ayd@googlemail.com: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] N1MM (score: 1): Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:53:09 +0100; I use N1MM for QSO, DX'and contest since when I started RTTY with PSK. I hate all those loggers that doesn't have all the macro, by the amount and by the features/usability, of N1MM. I made two sets; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-01/msg00282.html (9,583 bytes)
22. Re: [RTTY] GU0SUP in WPX (score: 1): Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:13:51 +0100; I agree with the comments of Phil GU0SUP, point by point. TU Phil, as usual. One more point to be add should be that I have seen stations calling in WITH NUMBERS in the first time! Well, I could not; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00204.html (7,913 bytes)
23. Re: [RTTY] Dupes how to handle (score: 1): Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:25:39 +0100; I strongly agree with the idea of Bill W6WRT for the S&P DUPEs, TU Bill as usual. I will C&P your macro text inside mine macro set: {TX}{ENTERLF}NOT IN LOG{ENTERLF}PLEASE WORK ME AGAIN {MYCALL} {MYCA; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00208.html (9,404 bytes)
24. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 110, Issue 31 (score: 1): Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:40:59 +0100; I don't think that the standard macros on wint-test, N1MM, QARtest nor for HRD & C are by their self respectfully of the written and unwritten rules for macros. I have seen samples where the macros s; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00222.html (8,486 bytes)
25. Re: [RTTY] Macros again (score: 1): Author: Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 10:15:59 +0100; Hello all. That's my penny. Assuming that my first answer, with me in RUN, was (TX)(CR)_HISCALL RST EXCH EXCH_(RX) (I will prefer to place here a second time HISCALL, but sometime its't too much) And; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00278.html (9,145 bytes)
26. Re: [RTTY] ROS policeman on 14101 (score: 1): Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 20:24:50 +0100; Hi all. Unfortunately that's what happened several time also from this side of the sea, even when operating calls different from mine. It happened when looking over there for a new multi or when I wa; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-03/msg00088.html (11,407 bytes)
27. Re: [RTTY] ROS policeman on 14101 (score: 1): Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:48:22 +0100; Hi Ed and Bill, I acknowledge yours answers, both of them. A change of the subject could be done, but I am not sure. But, anyway, from my newbie standpoint would it be possible to spread some words a; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-03/msg00105.html (10,877 bytes)
28. [RTTY] Do we need for RTTY a CLEAR RIT inside the ICOM CAT command set? (score: 1): Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>; Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 14:31:22 +0200; Hi all. Do we need, for RTTY, a CLEAR RIT command inside the ICOM CAT command set? I would like to know yours opinion on the subject matter. Let me know yours opinions here or even out of the list ps; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-04/msg00153.html (7,382 bytes)
29. Re: [RTTY] Thanks ARI - ZC4Li (score: 1): Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>; Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 22:11:43 +0200; Congrats dear Steve! Hope you have enough real estate to place this new one on the wall. May be you have to store one of the older ... never mind ;-> It was also great to meet you last weekend during; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00040.html (6,881 bytes)
30. Re: [RTTY] 7O6T on RTTY (score: 1): Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>; Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 21:34:01 +0200; Hello to all. This mail will just tell what happened to me the 13th morning during the a Contest. Nothing new. Well, it was a nice morning, just toward the end of the RTTY Contest, more than half was; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00146.html (11,707 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 30
Page: [1] [2]