Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ham@n0sq.us: 106 ]

Total 106 documents matching your query.

41. [RTTY] NAQP (score: 1)
Author: Lee Roberts <ham@n0sq.us>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 19:46:45 -0700
If I understand the rules correctly, single ops can't use DX clusters (telnet stuff)? _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00416.html (6,042 bytes)

42. [RTTY] QRV during NAQP? (score: 1)
Author: Lee Roberts <ham@n0sq.us>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 14:53:42 -0700
Would that be a violation of the rules sending or receiving QRV during exchanges? _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mai
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00421.html (6,108 bytes)

43. Re: [RTTY] QRV during NAQP? (score: 1)
Author: Lee Roberts <ham@n0sq.us>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:41:30 -0700 (MST)
After the exchange they'll send something like: QRV @freq - since this is unsolicited would I be disqualified if I move to that freq and work him/her? And shouldn't these hams be disqualified for doi
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00425.html (7,807 bytes)

44. Re: [RTTY] QRV during NAQP? (score: 1)
Author: Lee Roberts <ham@n0sq.us>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:43:55 -0700 (MST)
Single ops are suppose to operate unassisted. I believe what you're doing defeats the rule. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesti
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00427.html (7,858 bytes)

45. [RTTY] NAQP 2013 score summary (score: 1)
Author: Lee Roberts <ham@n0sq.us>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 17:04:03 -0700 (MST)
NAQP RTTY 2013 Score Summary Sheet Start Date : 2013-02-23 CallSign Used : N0SQ Operator(s) : N0SQ Operator Category : SINGLE-OP Band : ALL Power : LOW (100W) Mode : RTTY/FSK Overlay Category : OVER-
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00443.html (8,453 bytes)

46. [RTTY] BARTG HF SOAB summary (score: 1)
Author: Lee Roberts <ham@n0sq.us>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 21:16:07 -0600
BARTGSRTTY Score Summary Sheet CallSign Used : N0SQ Operator(s) : N0SQ Operator Category : SOAB Band : ALL Power : HIGH (400W) Mode : RTTY Default Exchange : 001 Gridsquare : DN81EU ARRL Section : NE
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00116.html (6,980 bytes)

47. Re: [RTTY] K3 reduced-bandwidth RTTY analysis (score: 1)
Author: Lee Roberts <ham@n0sq.us>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:31:12 -0600
Too bad I don't have narrower transmit filters in my TS2000 for FSK. I guess if I want to minimize my bandwidth I'll have to go AFSK with waveshaping or get a rig with transmit waveshaping for FSK. _
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00170.html (8,258 bytes)

48. Re: [RTTY] My thoughts on RTTY analysis (score: 1)
Author: Lee Roberts <ham@n0sq.us>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 13:03:14 -0600
I agree. I guess that's why I don't have a $3000+ rig or a StepIR or a 100+ foot tower. But, if there's money in it for the top score, I'll consider spending the bucks. But, I sure would like to at l
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00176.html (6,829 bytes)

49. Re: [RTTY] First RTTY QRP Contest (score: 1)
Author: Lee Roberts <ham@n0sq.us>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 13:08:27 -0600
I doubt that I'm going to get up at 0230 MT to work the 8:30-11:30 UTC portion but maybe I'll get in on the 12:30- 15:30 UTC segment. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00177.html (7,295 bytes)

50. [RTTY] DE T2YY UP 1-3? (score: 1)
Author: Lee Roberts <ham@n0sq.us>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:19:39 -0600
What does UP 1-3 mean? I saw this from T2YY (DE T2YY UP 1-3) _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00198.html (6,696 bytes)

51. Re: [RTTY] DE T2YY UP 1-3? (score: 1)
Author: Lee Roberts <ham@n0sq.us>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:20:01 -0600
Why would they do that? Is there some kind of benefit to operate split? _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00209.html (8,308 bytes)

52. Re: [RTTY] Callsigns (score: 1)
Author: Lee Roberts <ham@n0sq.us>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:27:40 -0600
My callsign is in my e-mail address. But I can always do it the way you do. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00210.html (7,191 bytes)

53. [RTTY] Windows XP and N1MM and serial port FSK (score: 1)
Author: Lee Roberts <ham@n0sq.us>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:35:36 -0600
Is anyone experiencing their rig keying up several times when starting up Win XP? And then keying up for several seconds when N1MM is started? I have to have the rig into a dummy load until after N1M
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00211.html (6,633 bytes)

54. [RTTY] 2tone error message (score: 1)
Author: Lee Roberts <ham@n0sq.us>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 19:37:32 -0600 (MDT)
When I went to set up 2tone 13.04a in an additional receive window, I keep getting an error message about a device ID being used that is out of range for my system. __________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-04/msg00006.html (6,286 bytes)

55. Re: [RTTY] With XP support ending... (score: 1)
Author: Lee <ham@n0sq.us>
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 18:29:09 -0700
Is someone suggesting that N1MM won't run on Windows 7? Last time I checked N1MM ran fine on Windows 7 with no problem. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesti
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00222.html (7,284 bytes)

56. Re: [RTTY] With XP support ending... (score: 1)
Author: Lee <ham@n0sq.us>
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 19:30:50 -0700
This is the way I run Windows XP and Windows 7. I use Ubuntu Linux 13.10 as the host OS and run Windows in a VM (Virtual Machine) as a guest OS. I've even run DOS based WF1B this way. Works great. Th
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00226.html (9,398 bytes)

57. [RTTY] using fldigi with TS2000 (score: 1)
Author: Lee <ham@n0sq.us>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 19:57:44 -0700
I believe that I have my PC-to-radio interface cable set up right but I can't seem to transmit any audio. The radio is keyed but no transmit audio. I have audio to ACC2-11 and my keying is on ACC2-13
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00364.html (7,104 bytes)

58. Re: [RTTY] using fldigi with TS2000 (score: 1)
Author: Lee <ham@n0sq.us>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:15:58 -0700
Actually, this wouldn't be specific to fldigi since it's a general issue for AFSK. Anyway, I was using pin 9 with FSK and N1MM and that was working. For AFSK, it is my understanding that pin 9 will m
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00370.html (8,612 bytes)

59. Re: [RTTY] using AFSK with TS2000 (score: 1)
Author: Lee <ham@n0sq.us>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:40:59 -0700
I did read the description of the pinouts on page 95. 9 P K S T r a n s c e i v e r P T T l i n e c o n t r o l G r o u n d t h i s t e r m i n a l t o t r a n s m i t . C o n n e c t t o t h e T N C
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00374.html (10,727 bytes)

60. Re: [RTTY] TS2000 and AFSK (score: 1)
Author: Lee <ham@n0sq.us>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 17:21:56 -0700
That's not my understanding of the manuals description of the pinouts. FSK works fine with N1MM but AFSK doesn't. So, it's not a software issue since AFSK doesn't work with fldigi, either. And yes, t
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00375.html (7,741 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
This search system is powered by Namazu