Mail Archive Search: <+from:graham@m5aav.org.uk>

Results:

References: [ +from:graham@m5aav.org.uk: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] ANARTS (score: 1): Author: Graham <graham@m5aav.org.uk>; Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 19:12:41 -0000; If one is genuinely agrieved with the 'behaviour' of the adjudicators, might I suggest that rather than boycotting the contest, one takes part - after all we *all* love RTTY Contesting, and then do n; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-06/msg00018.html (6,813 bytes)
2. [RTTY] Level Playing Field ? (score: 1): Author: Graham <graham@m5aav.org.uk>; Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:29:46 -0000; Come, come my friends. There is no such thing. Interestingly, almost the same discussion is going on another group. Over here, as most know, we are limited to 400 watts output. A limit which is of co; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00192.html (7,249 bytes)
3. [RTTY] YU6AO (score: 1): Author: Graham <graham@m5aav.org.uk>; Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 22:07:10 -0000; Has been CQing with few takers on 20 RTTY the last few days. Who needs a kW - 10watts and a dipole made the trip first time, also worked on SSB while out /P 5 watts to a /M whip second call 73 Graham; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-08/msg00040.html (6,610 bytes)
4. [RTTY] HF Prop spam (score: 1): Author: Graham <graham@m5aav.org.uk>; Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:29:13 -0000; It is all very well, but I get several copies a week - one to every group I subscribe to almost. Maybe it is not spam but they are certainly not looked at/acted upon, so are a complete waste of bandw; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-08/msg00107.html (6,390 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]