Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk: 81 ]

Total 81 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [RTTY] My first RTTY contest (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 08:50:20 +0100
Welcome to the madhouse, Michael! Thanks for the 15m contact with GM3W - the first of many, I hope. didles of phantom Yup, this guy has Got It! Just one passing comment: instead of the MMTTY X-Y scop
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00064.html (11,391 bytes)

62. Re: [RTTY] 2Tone (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 02:38:05 -0500
Could this chirp be related to the use of NET? 73 from Ian GM3SEK Kolarik _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/lis
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00116.html (7,549 bytes)

63. Re: [RTTY] 2013 Ten-Meter RTTY Contest Results (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 05:45:52 -0500
Wow - thanks to Don and Ed for such a fast turnaround! However, this may have been the last good year of the present sunspot cycle. Any thoughts about bringing back the HP category for December 2014?
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00003.html (6,952 bytes)

64. Re: [RTTY] Roundup observations - a bit long! (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 06:03:03 -0500
Is that simply because Roundup has no single-band categories? In most other contests, even the marginal bands have single-band entries who are the anchor for other activity. 73 from Ian GM3SEK (thank
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00104.html (10,365 bytes)

65. Re: [RTTY] New NCJ Website (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 04:07:56 -0500
For those of us who don't already subscribe to NCJ, the downloadable feature articles from past issues include the excellent article on RTTY bandwidth by Andy Flowers, K0SM. Go to <http://ncj.arrl.o
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00265.html (7,248 bytes)

66. Re: [RTTY] ARRL 2nd Century Campaign reply (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 09:08:22 +0100
ever! congratulated! The W1AW/x centenary program follows the success of Gx100RSGB in 2013: www.qrz.com/db/G100RSGB But the success of W1AW/x should not diminish anyone's concerns about RM11708. 73 f
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-05/msg00182.html (7,808 bytes)

67. Re: [RTTY] The RTTY efficiency myth and SUPERFILL (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 11:06:56 +0100
Absolutely! A QSO is not complete until BOTH stations have received an acknowledgement of the information they have sent - which means that the run station must <send> that final acknowledgement befo
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-07/msg00054.html (9,241 bytes)

68. Re: [RTTY] The RTTY efficiency myth and SUPERFILL (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 14:28:45 +0100
no just spinning the than you This unending debate between 'speed' and 'security' is why advanced operators are moving towards modular messages that can be optimized on the fly. Program the default
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-07/msg00057.html (10,000 bytes)

69. Re: [RTTY] Multiple cables on 1 core (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:05:39 +0100
The supposed purpose of ferrite cores on interface leads is to suppress any stray common-mode RF currents between different parts of the system (most often, between the transceiver and the PC). In t
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-09/msg00155.html (9,187 bytes)

70. Re: [RTTY] Multiple cables on 1 core (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:45:59 +0100
Bostjan and I are doing the same thing practically, but we are thinking about it in two entirely different ways... and that difference is important. I meant exactly what I said! The most important ai
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-09/msg00156.html (13,873 bytes)

71. Re: [RTTY] Palomar Engineers? Torroids? (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2014 08:25:15 +0100
Watch out for "ham" resellers who buy from ordinary industrial catalogs and then apply a huge markup. I have had bad service at high prices from both Palomar and Amidon, and wouldn't deal with either
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-10/msg00070.html (9,419 bytes)

72. Re: [RTTY] E30FB rtty? (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:09:00 -0500
It's done, via the UK pilot. They have that information now. 73 from Ian GM3SEK _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mail
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-03/msg00029.html (7,493 bytes)

73. Re: [RTTY] W6WRT email hacked (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:55:45 +0100
Most likely by hacking the account of someone else whose address book contained both of your email addresses. One address is selected randomly to become the spoof sender, and all the others become th
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-07/msg00032.html (7,423 bytes)

74. [RTTY] GM3W WPX RTTY SO20HP (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 02:42:56 -0500
Band QSOs Pts WPX 14 1310 3216 667 Score : 2,145,072 Rig : K3S + Quadra Antennas : 3el SteppIR Software: N1MM+ with multiple RTTY decoders. Difficult condx with lots of flutter on polar paths includi
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00118.html (6,483 bytes)

75. Re: [RTTY] My FT-950's RTTY power level admonition (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:47:29 -0500
!!!!!!!!!! In a big CW contest, maybe, but in RTTY we usually get a few seconds more [1]. However, there does seem to be an ever-widening gap between the serious RTTY contesters and the much larger n
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00131.html (8,362 bytes)

76. Re: [RTTY] My FT-950's RTTY power level admonition (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:17:54 -0500
Everybody has to start somewhere, so we can only hope that newcomers using the K3/K3S/KX3 quickly realise that direct paddle/keyboard input is not the best way to enjoy RTTY contesting. The main poin
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00145.html (8,929 bytes)

77. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 04:29:06 -0500
The quality of RTTY skimmer spots does continue to improve, but there is still a significant 'leakage' of spots for stations that are replying to a CQ. Although "CQ" can appear at both the beginning
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00166.html (12,470 bytes)

78. Re: [RTTY] Waterfall and CQ conundrum (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 17:50:42 -0500
If you do have a waterfall display and you do check it carefully before calling CQ, the only person who knows that is *yourself*. To anyone else who might be listening, you are indistinguishable from
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00264.html (7,294 bytes)

79. Re: [RTTY] K3 KIO3B USB Sound Card (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 22:06:10 +0100
in, I used That has also been my impression with RTTY decoding. When decoding weak and variable JT65B signals from VHF beacons, the long-term average for the decoding threshold seems to be within a
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00289.html (7,605 bytes)

80. Re: [RTTY] Re Skimmers (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 21:55:23 +0100
There is something seriously wrong with a large number of skimmers at the moment, because *nobody* in that pileup was sending "CQ" either before or after their callsigns. But it wasn't the skimmers w
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00321.html (7,201 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
This search system is powered by Namazu