- 41. Re: [RTTY] K4M on RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 07:30:21 +0100
- 3. The K4M online log shows when the most QSOs have been made from your CQ zone. Go to: http://www.clublog.org/charts/?c=K4M Enter your call and click "Find QSOs" (Hey KU0A, that's a fine spread of g
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00104.html (8,861 bytes)
- 42. Re: [RTTY] CQ RTTY WPX (score: 1)
- Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:09:19 +0000
- GM3SEK SO 40m HP Band QSOs Pts WPX 7 1100 5046 562 Score : 2,835,852 Thanks to everyone for the QSOs - especially the wonderful run of W/VE stations on Saturday evening (your time). But above all, th
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00109.html (7,539 bytes)
- 43. Re: [RTTY] SO2R in WPX RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:31:26 +0000
- RTTY contesting has two very different problems with slow responders. A few of them are SO2R operators who have an unexpected holdup on the other radio; but SO2R stations are still a small minority.
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00173.html (9,039 bytes)
- 44. Re: [RTTY] Swell (score: 1)
- Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 07:40:25 +0100
- Comment seen on another list: "Why does spaceweather.com put out these nonsense stories with such gross exaggeration? The largest flare in this 'explosion' was a B8, a trivially small one and these h
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-09/msg00074.html (8,080 bytes)
- 45. Re: [RTTY] Come on, Why bother? (score: 1)
- Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:50:22 +0000
- Those good folks are no problem at all. Much harder to handle are the stations who show up after enjoying an excellent Sunday lunch :-) -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek __________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00314.html (7,728 bytes)
- 46. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1)
- Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:19:19 +0000
- Agreed - the length of the exchanges always has to be balanced against the risk of points penalties for incorrect logging. That balance is constantly shifting so there is no solution that fits all ca
- /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00001.html (8,204 bytes)
- 47. Re: [RTTY] RTTY AWARD (score: 1)
- Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:55:58 +0100
- That simply isn't the point. The decision was driven *exclusively* by ARRL's policy that there will NO new categories or sub-category endorsements for DXCC awards. RTTY is not the first community wit
- /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00222.html (8,633 bytes)
- 48. Re: [RTTY] WAE RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 08:19:00 +0000
- The SEND QTC window will not open unless you are in QSO with a station on another continent *and* have valid QTCs to send. (This is most likely to happen when testing before the contest :-) -- 73 fro
- /archives//html/RTTY/2011-11/msg00040.html (7,576 bytes)
- 49. Re: [RTTY] Dupes how to handle (score: 1)
- Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:17:36 +0000
- Thanks, Ed - that post is yet another 'keeper' from you. They may be getting their timing right for P49X because you are stacking almost constantly, so callers can always hear what they need to do. B
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00199.html (11,416 bytes)
- 50. Re: [RTTY] Dupes how to handle (score: 1)
- Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:34:07 +0000
- wrote: That is a very good point. Many authors of digital and logging software are not contesters or DXers (the writer of HRD freely admits this) so the example macros that they supply are frankly aw
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00200.html (8,756 bytes)
- 51. Re: [RTTY] GU0SUP in WPX (score: 1)
- Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:42:59 +0000
- 25 miles, straight across the water... Try Orkney - that's always quiet ;-) -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00207.html (7,721 bytes)
- 52. Re: [RTTY] Dupes how to handle (score: 1)
- Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:32:44 +0000
- Or to make it even clearer: U R NOT IN MY LOG. -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00221.html (8,097 bytes)
- 53. Re: [RTTY] WPX funnies (score: 1)
- Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 23:26:18 +0000
- There is also a new kind of slow RTTY, from guys keying CW into a K3. -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@conte
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00282.html (8,403 bytes)
- 54. Re: [RTTY] Heathkit SB-1000 On RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:07:34 +0100
- Hold it down to 600 watts RF output and you can run it all day long. 600W output is close to the safe CW output! Eimac's data sheet gives 600W CW or PEP as the "useful power output" for a single 3-5
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-09/msg00124.html (10,721 bytes)
- 55. Re: [RTTY] Rude contesters (score: 1)
- Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 08:12:23 +0100
- The same happened earlier with PZ5RA. He delivered a real fire-and-brimstone sermon to the unruly mob before going QRT... and even while he was typing, some people were still calling. Again, some of
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00044.html (8,627 bytes)
- 56. Re: [RTTY] Rude contesters (score: 1)
- Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 07:58:01 +0100
- "packet generated Sunday afternoon pileups are getting as bad on RTTY as they are on SSB !!!!!!" Yeah, and now they are coming out with a RTTY Skimmer. I tried a cluster feed from RTTY Skimmer at the
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00073.html (9,213 bytes)
- 57. Re: [RTTY] 300hz or 500hz IF filter? (score: 1)
- Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:06:05 +0100
- That is correct, but Chen's previous sentence ("Any hardware filter should only be narrow enough to keep the sound card from clipping") overlooks many other problems that a narrower hardware filter c
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-08/msg00089.html (11,372 bytes)
- 58. Re: [RTTY] 300hz or 500hz IF filter? (score: 1)
- Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 20:56:23 +0100
- wider you spectrum of I would agree with all of that, except for the last point. When faced with S9+20dB QRM in a contest, the ability to decode weaker stations is at the very -top- of my list. The
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-08/msg00107.html (10,062 bytes)
- 59. [RTTY] Sad news from Cyprus: ZC4LI, Silent Keyboard (score: 1)
- Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 12:00:19 +0100
- -- Original Message -- *Sent:* Monday, September 02, 2013 12:43 PM *Subject:* Sad News Nick, Could you please forward this to the Cyprus Amateur Radio Society, as well as the members of the Paphos Cl
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00003.html (7,931 bytes)
- 60. [RTTY] CQWW RTTY: GM3W 15M HP (score: 1)
- Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 09:48:36 +0100
- CQWWRTTY Summary Sheet Callsign Used : GM3W Operator(s) : GM3SEK Operator Category : SINGLE-OP Band : 15M Power : HIGH Mode : RTTY Name : Wigtownshire ARC Band QSOs Pts ZN Cty W/VE 21 1410 3750 34 93
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00002.html (8,141 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu