Mail Archive Search: <+from:g3ldi@g3ldi.co.uk>

Results:

References: [ +from:g3ldi@g3ldi.co.uk: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] "Straight key night" for RTTY (score: 1): Author: Roger Cooke <g3ldi@g3ldi.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 13:00:37 +0000; Hi. Brilliant idea! I thought the world had gone mad. Even common old EU stations when returning to a CQ on RTTY come back with 599 73 and that's it! I don't even bother to acknowledge such stations; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-12/msg00079.html (9,803 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] "Straight key night" for RTTY (score: 1): Author: Roger Cooke <g3ldi@g3ldi.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:43:02 +0000; I got rid of my model 19 set some years ago. I would at that time have given my right arm for a 28ASR. That was the holy grail in the UK. I don't think anybody ever did get one. No, you will have to; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-12/msg00100.html (11,699 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Dashes in Contest Reports (score: 1): Author: Roger Cooke <g3ldi@g3ldi.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:36:14 +0000; Hi. I agree. The other thing that is quite annoying is for the extremists among us who just return with "152" and that's it. I don't like heavily populated macros, but that is just plain stupid. Ther; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00268.html (7,928 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] High Speed RTTY again (score: 1): Author: Roger Cooke <g3ldi@g3ldi.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:20:30 +0000; I have the Yaesu FT1000MP and the 250Hz filter is stated as being 250z at -6dB and 700Hz at -60dB. I also have the 500Hz which is again stated as being 500Hz at -6dB and 1.8kHz at -60dB. I can honest; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00434.html (15,296 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] BARTG HSS? Re: High speed RTTY (score: 1): Author: Roger Cooke <g3ldi@g3ldi.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:55:22 +0000; Hi. There is obviously some support for the 75 Baud contest, albeit a short one to start the ball rolling. As Chairman of BARTG, I would like to thank all those who have joined BARTG and a special th; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00435.html (9,173 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] BARTG HSS? Re: High speed RTTY (score: 1): Author: Roger Cooke <g3ldi@g3ldi.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:45:02 +0000; Hi Charles. Thanks for the nice chat on 75 bauds this afternoon. We were certainly speeding along there very nicely, although it was difficult keeping up with the typing! It helps keep the brain stim; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00441.html (10,432 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] High Speed RTTY again (score: 1): Author: Roger Cooke <g3ldi@g3ldi.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:33:43 +0000; HI Joe. My FT1000MP is fully fitted with filters - both IFs - plus I have the Inrad roofing filter too. I had two contacts yesterday, KK5OQ for 25 minutes, and also K4HBM about five minutes. The firs; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00449.html (22,726 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] RTTY-75 HRD-380 (score: 1): Author: Roger Cooke <g3ldi@g3ldi.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 21:32:11 +0000; Hi Russell. I could not hear anything on your frequency by the time I got on there. However, I shall be at home tomorrow and will be around after 1400 on around 14090, using 75 Bauds RTTY. 73 de Roge; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00457.html (7,681 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] XE contest (75 baud) (score: 1): Author: Roger Cooke <g3ldi@g3ldi.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 14:20:56 +0000; Hi Russell. I have had a bad week!! My PC died on me on Monday and have spent the week trying to recover data and revive the HD. That is why you have seen nothing of me on 75 Bauds this week. However; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00016.html (8,163 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] XE contest @ 75 baud (score: 1): Author: Roger Cooke <g3ldi@g3ldi.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 19:09:22 +0000; Hi Russell et al. I did put out a few CQ calls on 75. I had a few replies too, but like you sadly they stayed on 45.5 Bauds so no contact. I shall try a few CQ calls this coming week. Unfortunately I; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00025.html (8,907 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] XE contest @ 75 baud (score: 1): Author: Roger Cooke <g3ldi@g3ldi.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:05:28 +0000; Hi Y'all. I think Shelby had a good point regarding trying 75 Bauds in a "normal" contest. This just will not happen. I am only going to try 75 in casual use, chatting etc., until John, GW4SKA organi; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00046.html (12,087 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] XE contest @ 75 baud (score: 1): Author: Roger Cooke <g3ldi@g3ldi.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:57:16 +0000; Hi Fabi. Well, it does work very well, but we must all be using the same speed. SO changing speeds within a normal contest is not going to get you extra points of Qs. John, GW4SKA should be home this; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00049.html (15,677 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] SO2R in WPX RTTY (score: 1): Author: Roger Cooke <g3ldi@g3ldi.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:00:21 +0000; Hi Phil. Yes, I noticed a few, but I ignored them and cut them out of the log. If the other station does not respond to my call within two seconds, tough! I will work someone else! 73 de Roger, G3LDI; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00144.html (9,803 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] SO2R in WPX RTTY (score: 1): Author: Roger Cooke <g3ldi@g3ldi.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:29:05 +0000; OK, maybe two seconds is a bit impatient! However, I don't think that we should support the run rate of an SO2R station by sitting looking out of the window waiting on his reply. There is another way; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00149.html (14,146 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] SO2R in WPX RTTY (score: 1): Author: Roger Cooke <g3ldi@g3ldi.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:52:17 +0000; Well, it looks like this topic has opened a can of worms! As has been said, it really is down to the individual which mode he uses and no-one is complaining really about the use of SO2R. I guess that; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00174.html (10,174 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] [ARRL-LOTW] Re: BARTG 75 Sprint (score: 1): Author: Roger Cooke <g3ldi@g3ldi.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:56:57 +0100; Looks like I have egg on my face! Yes, I just found that out myself on QRZ.COM. I was watching PSK just before the CC test and I felt sure that he mentioned the age of 93. Perhaps it was the other gu; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00169.html (10,246 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] Why is 40 Meter contesting in CW segment? (score: 1): Author: Roger Cooke <g3ldi@g3ldi.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 14:36:39 +0000; Should have checked my bandplan first!!! Hand before brain again. John is correct of course. However, in "practice" it is somewhat different. Unfortunately the plans are not adhered to rigidly and th; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00040.html (15,445 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] Staying Alert in 48 hour contests (score: 1): Author: Roger Cooke <g3ldi@g3ldi.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 10:58:16 +0000; I think anybody that even toys with the idea of sitting in front of a transceiver for 48 hours continuously is a bit sad, to put it politely. That's probably why I shall never win one of these contes; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-09/msg00018.html (9,188 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] bartg sprint 75 sv1dpi (score: 1): Author: Roger Cooke <g3ldi@g3ldi.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 13:53:25 +0000; It's true what Don says. However, these problems can be overcome to some extent by just tweaking the macros slightly. One good example happened to me a few times in this last contest. I sent my repor; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-09/msg00052.html (11,377 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] Expeds,DX, a Gripe ! (score: 1): Author: Roger Cooke <g3ldi@g3ldi.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 10:08:20 +0000; I totally agree, and by the same reasoning, why do callers of the DX-peditions NEVER check their own frequency first BEFORE calling? I thought that was an expected operating standard, and common dece; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00036.html (7,790 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]