Mail Archive Search: <+from:g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:g.m.mcadams@comcast.net: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Interference to Hurricane Rita Ops (score: 1): Author: g.m.mcadams@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 13:35:29 +0000; Don, This is the kind of response that we often get from non-contest operators. I cannot understand why the emergency operations are not being carried out on the 60 meter band. Is that not why it was; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00106.html (9,036 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] note against RTTY-contester (score: 1): Author: "Gary McAdams" <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 20:28:48 -0700; Ed and All: That's what I thought also, until I had a chance to go to E-ham.net. W7AIT is apparently on a crusade, read the "What happened to 40 meters" Thread. 73 all Gary WG7X Can we please drop th; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00147.html (8,378 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] W4WX on 60 meters RTTY tonight (score: 1): Author: "Gary McAdams" <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 16:37:34 -0800; Don, That's OK for him because I don't know what regulations are applicable in H44, but for stateside hams USB voice at 50 watts ERP is the only permitted mode. I guess that we can try to hear him, b; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00297.html (9,010 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Kenwood TL-922 amp on RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Gary McAdams" <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 09:54:14 -0700; Rick, I use my '922 almost every time that I'm on RTTY. I generally load it up to about 1kw input with the mode switch in the "CW" position. Depending on band, this gives any where from 400-800 watts; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-06/msg00071.html (8,474 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] diddle (score: 1): Author: "Gary McAdams" <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 18:49:28 -0800; Rich, The "diddle" is produced not by the radio itself, but by the mechanism driving it. In the absence of a driving signal, most rigs put out a single tone when in the RTTY position. Only when modul; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00396.html (8,381 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] RTTY is getting lower and lower in frequency on 20meters. (score: 1): Author: "Gary McAdams" <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 11:01:49 -0800; Tom, Ok, the first part of your message made sense... But what the heck does the second sentence mean in today's context? There are no NCG's (no code generals) on 20 meters yet. That won't happen unt; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00099.html (8,872 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] LoTW results (score: 1): Author: "Gary McAdams" <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:38:57 -0800; Yeah, Us digital (RTTY) types have always been quick with the confirmations! I worked over 300 RTTY stations over the week-end and have almost 90 LOTW QSL's since yesterday! Rtty'ers have always been; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00150.html (7,968 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] Rtty contest when Cw contest is on also (score: 1): Author: g.m.mcadams@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:31:20 +0000; Mike, Yeah, just let it go. It's not worth arguing about, and its not going to change so why beat each other up? It sounds like he is just venting to you, a good friend. Let him vent and he'll feel b; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-03/msg00077.html (7,580 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] [dxlab] OT: WD-1A wire for antennas (score: 1): Author: g.m.mcadams@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 22:56:14 +0000; Lee, I've been using WD-1 wire for antennas for the last two decades. The US Army used to toss it out, and I'd scoop it up. Good stuff... Three strands of stainless steel and five strands of tin-plat; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-05/msg00095.html (10,014 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] W6WRT is correct... (score: 1): Author: Gary McAdams <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:23:44 -0700; AMEN!!! Leadership comes from the top... Indulging in the endless arguments like this certainly drives folks away. If it comes from the list administrator... Well... Yes the delete key will be used,; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00292.html (7,762 bytes)
11. [RTTY] wg7x (score: 1): Author: Gary McAdams <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:45:27 -0700; Attachment: WG7X cqww rtty.LOG Description: Text document _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-09/msg00118.html (6,826 bytes)
12. [RTTY] wg7x (score: 1): Author: Gary McAdams <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:51:32 -0700; Attachment: WG7X cqww rtty.LOG Description: Text document _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-09/msg00119.html (6,406 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] 24 Hours before the Roundup (score: 1): Author: Gary McAdams <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 17:41:13 -0800; ALL... As they say "Me too!" Thanks for the "DC" contact Masa. I only missed Wyoming for all fifty. "55 Sections", but not too much DX. All-in-all A good contest... Must have been because I only arce; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00174.html (8,906 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] WAS RTTY LOTW (score: 1): Author: Gary McAdams <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 15:39:28 -0700; All this talk about RTTY WAS made me decide to apply also. I applied on Sunday and received NR 120 today, the Following Saturday. 73 Gary _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00227.html (7,102 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] RTTY RU Exchange Complaints (score: 1): Author: Gary McAdams <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:35:00 -0800; Well, how about the ones who sent: Please copy: (exchange) or 5NN (exchange) or the ones already mentioned who preceded the exchange with series of periods.... 73 Gary _______________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-01/msg00058.html (6,963 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] 7O6T (score: 1): Author: Gary McAdams <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 08:34:23 -0700; Speaking from the sidelines... I was totally amazed at the hubris displayed here recently by one of our "big guns". Totals? Is that what this is all about? Who really cares about "totals" except some; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00095.html (7,907 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] STATION IDENTIFICATION IN CONTESTING (score: 1): Author: Gary McAdams <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 06:42:41 -0700; John N1JM That's true, but that does not make it right. We seem to have a lot of stations who want speed over all. Personally I don't see it as a major problem to ID after every exchange. My macros:; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00078.html (8,633 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] Rudest People in the World (score: 1): Author: Gary McAdams <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 00:20:15 -0800; Dick Don't sweat it. There are so many "special reserved" frequencies these days that it a wonder we can operate in any mode. Nets, special mode freq's, ragchewers, all combine into one big mess. If; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00024.html (7,562 bytes)
19. [RTTY] wg7x (score: 1): Author: Gary McAdams <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 18:45:13 -0700; Attachment: wwrtty13LOG.LOG Description: Text document _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00146.html (6,562 bytes)
20. [RTTY] Emergency JT-65 Frequency? (score: 1): Author: Gary McAdams <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 16:29:36 -0800; All this stuff about JT modes is misplaced is it not? QUOTE: So there I was, enjoying a nice run in the RU on about 14.133 at 23:54 or so and all of a sudden a station that did not ID itself told me; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00083.html (9,778 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]