Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:f6irf@free.fr: 119 ]

Total 119 documents matching your query.

41. [RTTY] HB0/DJ5BX on LOTW? (score: 1)
Author: f6irf@free.fr
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:35:38 +0200
Ekki First of all thanks for the TTY activity from HB0. Just a question: Are you planning to upload your logs to LOTW ? It's fast, it costs nothing and I am sure you will make more than one happy...
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00002.html (7,361 bytes)

42. [RTTY] Makrothen,N1MM and distance calculation (score: 1)
Author: f6irf@free.fr
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 15:24:02 +0200
RE: Gordon's 3830 post(N1MGO) http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/3830/2004-10/msg00393.html QUOTE n1mm did not score correctly either.UNQUOTE As mentionned on my 3830 post http://lists.contes
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00110.html (7,826 bytes)

43. Re: [RTTY] Makrothen,N1MM and distance calculation (score: 1)
Author: f6irf@free.fr
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 19:22:27 +0200
Yes Art... you are absolutely right... like on a chess game. By the way, found an entry mistake in my log (KO26 entered K026 *)... After correction checked again: DK3VN : 3235482 N1MM JN35LL: 3232868
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00117.html (8,553 bytes)

44. RE: [RTTY] Makrothen & Claimed Scores (score: 1)
Author: f6irf@free.fr
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 00:31:23 +0200
Hi everybody... Preamble First of all I am not trying to start a useless polemic... because as mentionned in each of my mail on the topic, it does not really matter... Second preamble (I have to be v
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00132.html (11,161 bytes)

45. [RTTY] Age and gender statistics (score: 1)
Author: f6irf@free.fr
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:12:28 +0200
Did some amazing stats on my jarts log: Younger: 13 (UN7PBY) Older : 83 (W3FQE, WB9NOV) my log average: 52.5 By WAZ == CIS (16,17,18,19) : 46.5 Japan (25): 51 Western EU (14,15) : 52.3 North America
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00195.html (6,490 bytes)

46. re: [RTTY] Age and gender statistics (score: 1)
Author: f6irf@free.fr
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 22:00:03 +0200
A correction to my previous post... Gender stats are wrong! pse read: male: 98% female 0.8% Undetermined (neither M/F) 1.2% Notes - Are considered "female" stations giving 00 report... - Are consider
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00238.html (8,153 bytes)

47. [RTTY] Is writelog still the best RTTY-contesting option? (score: 1)
Author: f6irf@free.fr
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:58:59 +0200
Hi everybody OK, the title sounds like a provocation - in a way it is... It all started from a discussion I had 2 days ago with Phil, F6IFY one of the first Writelog EU-user... First, let me be clear
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00295.html (13,421 bytes)

48. Re: [RTTY] Is writelog still the best RTTY-contesting option? (score: 1)
Author: f6irf@free.fr
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 21:21:52 +0200
Waooouhhh... To be honnest I was expecting the topic to be a bit hot... but I was not expecting such an avalanche in my email in-box... Now... I am not gonna reply point by point to every "pro" and "
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00312.html (9,403 bytes)

49. [RTTY] AFC and NET: No, thanks (score: 1)
Author: f6irf@free.fr
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 22:15:14 +0200
Hi Bill I just get the impression that you are taking me for a beginner...(*) Never said that you have to use AFC when S&P'ing... just said that with N1MM it was not possible to forget the AFC when d
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00315.html (9,653 bytes)

50. Re: [RTTY] Tools and contesting (score: 1)
Author: f6irf@free.fr
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:36:54 +0200
did win contests with it as well. Good to see, that not everybody is taking it too seriously... may affect your sense of humour"... Easily agree with this... and as already mentionned the worst bein
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00327.html (8,322 bytes)

51. [RTTY] Code 10 (score: 1)
Author: f6irf@free.fr
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:02:18 +0200
Hi Brian - Just in case you only have the MMTTY engine, recommend you install the full version - The full version has some presets programmed by Mako, which I found extremely useful- The DSP/FFT par
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00393.html (10,258 bytes)

52. [RTTY] ae4jy HF path simulator (score: 1)
Author: f6irf@free.fr
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 15:42:32 +0100
Don't know if it has already mentionned here, but this is a simple but extremely useful tool to compair decoders, fine-tune MMTTY filters and settings, etc... http://www.qsl.net/ae4jy/pathsim.htm Wor
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00008.html (8,728 bytes)

53. [RTTY] AE4JY HF path simulator (score: 1)
Author: f6irf@free.fr
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 14:22:01 +0100
re my previous email If you try "pathsim" don't be surprised to find out that you are able to decode CW down to -19dB in 3kHz BW, while K1JT chart shows the human limit around -14dB in 2.5Khz BW for
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00020.html (7,473 bytes)

54. Re: [RTTY] ae4jy HF path simulator (score: 1)
Author: f6irf@free.fr
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 21:58:11 +0100
Hi Terry not saying that it is miraculous, but that it provides some improvement over the standard settings... According to Mako's explanations, this preset uses the ATC as echo-canceller. I am using
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00033.html (7,747 bytes)

55. [RTTY] WEA RTTY off times (score: 1)
Author: f6irf@free.fr
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 22:58:17 +0100
Dirk It just means that even if you are working 24h out of the 48, you cannot take 24x 1h as "off-time"... not 12x2h and not not 8x3h... (because in none of those cases 3 periods are making 12 or mor
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00051.html (8,226 bytes)

56. RE: [RTTY] Re: ae4jy HF path simulator (score: 1)
Author: f6irf@free.fr
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:06:40 +0100
Hi, If somebody has problem to download, just drop me an email, I'll forward you the zip (only 350k)- it includes the help and everything needed... Patrick [Top] [All Lists] <prev [Date] next> [Advan
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00068.html (8,016 bytes)

57. Re: [RTTY] WAEDC + QTC's and how to handle them (score: 1)
Author: f6irf@free.fr
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 07:13:01 +0100
Goetz, Are you sure about this? To be honnest I have serious doubts ! The rule states that "Every QTC that was correctly transferred, counts one point for the sender and one point for the receiver."
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00077.html (8,059 bytes)

58. [RTTY] LOTW: 100 (score: 1)
Author: f6irf@free.fr
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:04:41 +0100
Ok, just "mixed" so far... (but only QSO's from march 2002 / mostly CW & TTY contests). It shows that "it works" and confirms what we were saying a few months ago... Despite scepticisms and criticism
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00121.html (8,629 bytes)

59. [RTTY] updating QSL-status from LOTW-report (score: 1)
Author: f6irf@free.fr
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:57:22 +0100
Let see if anybody has a solution for this one: - I am looking for a solution to be able to update the QSL status of my general log, according to the LOTW report (in adi format) I have tried various
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00133.html (7,825 bytes)

60. RE: [RTTY] updating QSL-status from LOTW-report (score: 1)
Author: f6irf@free.fr
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 22:02:29 +0100
Tnx to all for the replies (apparently no need to re-invent the wheel, solutions already exist) and apologize for a subject a bit "out of list topic" Pat _____________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00141.html (7,079 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu