Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ed@w0yk.com: 551 ]

Total 551 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] MMTTY AFC Bug (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 04:48:48 -0800
Dick, K7VC, asked: Dave, AA6YQ, replied: How difficult would it be for MMTTY to retain a "check" by the profile currently in use? This has bugged me for years now that the MMTTY profile menu selectio
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00423.html (9,402 bytes)

22. Re: [RTTY] MMTTY AFC Bug (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:05:41 -0800
I was thinking of the far larger number of users of the three most popular contest loggers (N1MM Logger, Win-Test and WriteLog) with integrated MMTTY. Fixing this bug in MMTTY would benefit users of
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00459.html (11,911 bytes)

23. Re: [RTTY] MMTTY AFC Bug (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 20:13:44 -0800
Good points, Joe. I agree that the check mark should go away when you make a change to an initial profile loaded from userpara.ini. There is an easy middle ground, though. Take my preference for an e
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00469.html (15,101 bytes)

24. Re: [RTTY] 2011 RTTY Roundup - 3830 Claimed Scores 14Jan2011 (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 19:57:20 -0800
Dick, K7VC, asked: There are a number of reasons, but the fundamental reason is that the rules practically guarantee a SO will have a higher score than a MS given the same station, same location and
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00553.html (9,450 bytes)

25. Re: [RTTY] BARTG COMMENTS (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 19:18:16 -0800
Good points have been made on both sides of this thread, but what is missing for me is the reality that each QSO is a unique situation. There is not "correct" way of handling every contact. "It depen
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00726.html (10,264 bytes)

26. Re: [RTTY] WPX Tips and Tricks Needed (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 16:49:29 -0800
A key distinction of WPX is double points for low-band QSOs. If you can maintain at least half the rate on 80 and 40 that you can get on the high bands, then that's where you should be. It all depend
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00028.html (9,199 bytes)

27. Re: [RTTY] WPX Tips and Tricks Needed (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 06:17:54 -0500
On Sunday, February 06, 2011 7:58 PM, Dick Flanagan asked: I doubt it, but it depends on what your goals are in the contest and what the capability of your station and location are. Ed - W0YK/4 _____
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00034.html (7,809 bytes)

28. Re: [RTTY] WPX Rules Question (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 23:54:57 -0400
Yes, this is fine as long as you use a different call sign, of course. Ed - P49X (W0YK) CQ RTTY Contest Manager _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com h
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00059.html (7,865 bytes)

29. Re: [RTTY] RTTY WPX N5UWY SOAB(TS) LP (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:21:49 -0400
(www.cqwpxrtty.com/rules.htm): V. B. (a) Tribander/Single Element (TB-WIRES): During the contest an entrant shall use only one (1) tribander (any type, with a single feed line from the transmitter to
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00163.html (8,295 bytes)

30. Re: [RTTY] Which logger sends "Now <nextcall>..." (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 07:38:44 -0400
Gary, AL9A, describes below one way to accelerate QSOs when you have more than one call sign available, either from a pileup, or from a tail-ender. This method is the way I used to do it up until a y
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00190.html (16,406 bytes)

31. Re: [RTTY] Which logger sends "Now <nextcall>..." (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 00:29:48 -0400
The one line message doesn't work because operationally the '%L' doesn't take effect until after all the rest of the message, which causes the second '%C' to pick up the first call sign rather than t
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00228.html (12,233 bytes)

32. Re: [RTTY] Which logger sends "Now <nextcall>..." (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 00:35:27 -0400
Gary, AL9A, asked: These keyboard shortcuts have been in WriteLog for some time now. In the Keyboard Shortcuts window select 'Next key pressed' to choose the key you want to assign the function to. (
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00230.html (9,932 bytes)

33. Re: [RTTY] UR 599 QWI QWI (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 04:54:23 -0400
The letters-for-numbers problem is the result of a noise hit on the number-shift character so that the subsequent character codes are interpreted in the Letters character set rather than the Numbers
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00239.html (9,235 bytes)

34. Re: [RTTY] Keyboard vs Mouse (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 07:08:21 -0800
Some comments on this trade-off: 1. If the majority of the contest can be done with EITHER the mouse/trackball or the keyboard, there is more efficiency and less fatigue than constantly moving betwee
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00373.html (9,302 bytes)

35. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 18:34:10 -0800
In addition, N1MM Logger allows the user to choose FIRST IN, FIRST OUT or LAST IN, FIRST OUT. Right-click the stack and a menu pops up for you to choose which logic you want. I almost always want to
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00398.html (10,088 bytes)

36. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 19:28:07 -0800
Apparently not, from Rick's posting just now. I thought this was fixed for both stacks, and it looks like it will be shortly. I argue that it makes no sense to pop the last call in the stack. I want
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00401.html (14,143 bytes)

37. Re: [RTTY] NAQP RTTY RULES Non-North America (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:26:13 -0800
You can't leave the QTH field blank. For non-US/VE stations, enter the country (the other station should send their country in the exchange). For non-NA stations, enter 'DX' (some send their country,
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00418.html (8,737 bytes)

38. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:23:47 -0800
I agree with each of Mike's several very good points below. A key inference from all his comments is to make messages modular so that two or more can be dynamically combined to create the appropriate
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00022.html (18,663 bytes)

39. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 16:54:52 -0800
I understand your concern and agree that the messages should come across to the other operators as making sense. First of all, most of the time the nominal messages will be used so there is no issue.
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00037.html (12,215 bytes)

40. Re: [RTTY] Logging Software Used in 2010 CQ WW RTTY Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 09:33:50 -0800
Yes, there is surely a bunch of WF1B-generated logs and they are in these numbers or in one of the other log tools. The data just comes from the "CREATED BY:" line in the Cabrillo header. That only t
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00060.html (8,283 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu