Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dick@k7vc.com: 94 ]

Total 94 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] need help (score: 1)
Author: Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:36:38 -0700
Please keep it here so we can all benefit from the troubleshooting. Dick -- Dick Flanagan K7VC dick@k7vc.com _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-08/msg00072.html (7,453 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] Your complaints (score: 1)
Author: Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 21:03:47 -0700
Pardon my ignorance, but I have to agree with Rick. I've also searched the archives and while I don't know what has been going on privately, publicly Joe has been very helpful. Dick K7VC -- Dick Flan
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-08/msg00079.html (9,482 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Anyone Have a DXP38 For Sale? (score: 1)
Author: Dick Flanagan K7VC <dick@k7vc.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:34:50 -0700
This begs an interesting question (interesting to me, anyway): Is there a widely accepted best hardware RTTY decoder? (Computer software and radio left out of the equation for the moment)? Dick -- Di
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-08/msg00146.html (7,710 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] best hardware RTTY decoder? (score: 1)
Author: Dick Flanagan K7VC <dick@k7vc.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:50:42 -0700
I would like to thank everyone for their inputs on the best hardware RTTY decoder. As good as these units are, I have detected what seems to be an undercurrent of opinion that even the best are still
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-08/msg00161.html (8,281 bytes)

5. [RTTY] 599 Log Reports? (score: 1)
Author: Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 21:20:29 -0700
I am really new at RTTY contests and when looking at the BARTG Sprint 75 rules I came across the rule "Logs must not include any 599 signal reports." Can someone explain this rule in simple words a n
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-09/msg00034.html (7,589 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] 599 Log Reports? (score: 1)
Author: Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 21:36:38 -0700
Is the reasoning that this is simply unnecessary information and wastes bandwidth? Dick -- Dick Flanagan K7VC dick@k7vc.com _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@cont
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-09/msg00035.html (8,550 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] 599 Log Reports? (score: 1)
Author: Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 09:09:08 -0700
That makes sense. I was just curious bout the specificity of 599 as opposed to simply stating "no signal reports." Thanks for clearing it up, Bill. See you in the Sprint. Dick -- Dick Flanagan K7VC d
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-09/msg00040.html (8,252 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] FIRST Top Band (160m) Digital QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 18:35:11 -0700
That looks like a typo where the end should be *26*, not 16. Dick -- Dick Flanagan K7VC dick@k7vc.com _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://list
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-09/msg00050.html (7,947 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] FIRST Top Band (160m) Digital QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 18:38:08 -0700
activity on 160m. I like the idea. This way for two weeks out of the year I can call CQ on 160m without feeling stupid. :) Dick -- Dick Flanagan K7VC dick@k7vc.com ___________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-09/msg00051.html (7,589 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] New call with no numbers (score: 1)
Author: Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 13:36:59 -0800
Wasn't that an old rectifier tube?? Dick -- Dick Flanagan K7VC dick@k7vc.com _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00006.html (8,730 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 97, Issue 5 (score: 1)
Author: Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:12:51 -0800
I use DE with CQ and TU, not with the exchange. If people don't like it they can bloody well call someone else. Dick -- Dick Flanagan K7VC dick@k7vc.com ______________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00084.html (8,692 bytes)

12. [RTTY] MMTTY AFC Bug (score: 1)
Author: Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 23:18:24 -0800
Is there a fix for MMTTY randomly turning AFC off? Dick -- Dick Flanagan K7VC dick@k7vc.com _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesti
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00145.html (8,749 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] MMTTY AFC Bug (score: 1)
Author: Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 04:37:46 -0800
I am running MMTTY 1.68A with the latest Writelog. I'll be running, give my exchange and then suddenly I can't find the other station. I notice that AFC has slipped off, punch it back on and stumble
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00147.html (9,622 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] MMTTY AFC Bug (score: 1)
Author: Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 13:00:41 -0800
The AFC button turns itself off and I have to click it back on. Dick standalone, or as part -- Dick Flanagan K7VC dick@k7vc.com _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00159.html (12,563 bytes)

15. Re: [RTTY] Post Roundup comments (score: 1)
Author: Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:12:44 -0800
KB8UUM Dick -- Dick Flanagan K7VC dick@k7vc.com _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00245.html (8,953 bytes)

16. Re: [RTTY] KH6ZM? (score: 1)
Author: Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:50:19 -0800
I copied him late on Sunday and I was receiving his full call. I also got "multiplier fever" when I hit the wrong key with a minute to go and managed to CQ over the top of him. :( That wouldn't have
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00259.html (7,624 bytes)

17. [RTTY] Use of AFC with MMTTY (score: 1)
Author: Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:53:59 -0800
I thought I had this right, but now I'm not too sure. I operate only FSK with WriteLog/MMTTY. I run with my radio RIT/TIT turned OFF and with MMTTY AFC ON. I S&P with RIT/TIT turned OFF and with MMTT
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00261.html (7,414 bytes)

18. [RTTY] RTTY Roundup K7VC M/S HP (score: 1)
Author: Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:11:58 -0800
ARRL RTTY Roundup Call: K7VC Operator(s): K7VC Station: K7VC Class: M/S HP QTH: NV Operating Time (hrs): 24:00 Summary: Band QSOs -- 80: 139 40: 232 20: 562 15: 241 10: 5 -- Total: 1179 State/Prov =
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00331.html (9,135 bytes)

19. Re: [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1)
Author: Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:53:16 -0800
When I'm running I often have multiple stations responding to me. I end my TU with a QRZ. If no one responds, I send a CQ. The use of QRZ by running contest and DX stations has become so prevalent th
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00336.html (9,839 bytes)

20. Re: [RTTY] MMTTY AFC Bug (score: 1)
Author: Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:00:00 -0800
If I haven't set the MMTTY profile, how can I tell which one I am operating under? Dick -- Dick Flanagan K7VC dick@k7vc.com _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@cont
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00374.html (8,978 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
This search system is powered by Namazu