Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat1242@wildblue.net: 106 ]

Total 106 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 19:54:26 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) On 2/4/2014 5:43 PM, km9m-zig@comcast.net wrote: Personal opinion: Changing the "pileup procedure" will be useless. The problem is a lack of ethics for the lids cre
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00096.html (9,577 bytes)

62. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 04:50:05 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: Spread out more. We often jam ourselves into a few kHz, when we have the entire RTTY sub band available. As long as you find a clear frequency in the sub ban
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00103.html (9,884 bytes)

63. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 09:21:49 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) Steve IK4WMH REPLY: I'm not sure either. No one can be sure one way or the other until QYF tried a few times. Right now I am listening to FT5ZM on 14023 and some li
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00113.html (9,742 bytes)

64. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 09:30:19 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) On 2/5/2014 8:15 AM, Phil Sussman wrote: This causes calling stations to keep calling over and over without vacating -- thus keeping multiple frequencies occupied w
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00116.html (10,966 bytes)

65. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 09:31:51 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) This is a bad idea. REPLY: I'm open to suggestions. What do you have? 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesti
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00117.html (9,925 bytes)

66. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 09:42:37 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) On 2/5/2014 9:22 AM, Vilnis YL2KF wrote: During pile-up to Amsterdam isl. come to idea - what happens if I try to give my call on two or three split frequencies sim
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00118.html (9,838 bytes)

67. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:27:29 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: YF = Your Frequency, which is where I (the DX) will call you. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contestin
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00127.html (9,605 bytes)

68. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:31:50 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) You can find the complete code here: http://www.astrosol.ch/downloads/qzcodescis.doc REPLY: You have found a more complete list than I had. QYF appears to be taken
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00128.html (10,563 bytes)

69. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:38:08 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) Vy 73 Chen REPLY: I don't understand. If you're hearing him on his CQ frequency, you will hear him on your own frequency as long as your frequency is reasonably cle
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00129.html (10,007 bytes)

70. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:29:26 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) On 2/5/2014 1:22 PM, Kok Chen wrote: Lets say I call the DX and he comes back to me. However, people around me don't know that he has come back to me, so they keep
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00134.html (10,609 bytes)

71. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:33:57 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: I agree. The mess really got started when the ARRL created five band DXCC and WAS. Before then, you worked a station once and that was it. Now there are awar
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00135.html (10,623 bytes)

72. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 134, Issue 19 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 17:12:59 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: Why would you want to? I don't. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00139.html (7,366 bytes)

73. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 17:32:03 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: For the record, I only stop discussions for two reasons: 1. They drift off the topic of RTTY. 2 They become personal attacks. As long as people have somethin
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00142.html (11,091 bytes)

74. Re: [RTTY] What's cleaner: FSK or AFSK? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 17:39:15 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) On 2/5/2014 5:31 PM, RLVZ@aol.com wrote: Am I understanding recent comments correctly that say "FSK stations typically have worse RTTY sidebands and clicks than pro
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00143.html (7,247 bytes)

75. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 09:34:46 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) Of course this means that either Icom people are always off topic/attacking each other, or the mod has a seriously happy trigger finger, and doesn't allow many free
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00154.html (9,807 bytes)

76. Re: [RTTY] CQ WPX RTTY Practices (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 17:13:24 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) 73, Jamie WB4YDL REPLY: Sorry to hear that Jamie. I always look forward to putting YDL in the log. Better luck next time. 73, Bill W6WRT ___________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00159.html (8,089 bytes)

77. Re: [RTTY] Ice on antennas - get on-air anyway! (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 10:16:17 -0800
I know it's been mentioned before, but I'm surprised someone doesn't make a heater for yagis. Sure, it would cost something to engineer and market, but yagis are expensive too. Considering yagis are
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00165.html (7,528 bytes)

78. Re: [RTTY] LoTW confirmation rates (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:43:57 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: If anyone has not upgraded to the latest version of TQSL (2.0), you should. The interface is much cleaner and easier to use. 73, Bill W6WRT _________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00185.html (7,527 bytes)

79. Re: [RTTY] QSL et. el. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:52:42 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) It used to be 'hard cards' were verified and even so fraud existed. Certainly fraud still exists. REPLY: Many times in the olden days I received a paper QSL and sev
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00188.html (7,803 bytes)

80. [RTTY] New font (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 14:59:05 -0800
I have come across a new (to me anyway) non-proportional font with a slashed zero which has a very nice look to it. It's called ProFont and you can download it from http://tobiasjung.name/profont/ Th
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00211.html (6,768 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
This search system is powered by Namazu