- 41. Re: [RTTY] Cut Numbers Revisited (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
- Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 21:54:35 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: Don't know why Rex used my call in his example, but just for the record, I never use that format. And if you are using N1MM Logger, you can click anywhere in
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00174.html (8,487 bytes)
- 42. [RTTY] Band plans (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 13:17:38 -0800
- I know the ARRL is not in great favor these days, but I think we should pretty much stick with their band plan. If everybody and his brother promotes their own band plan, chaos will result. Remember
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00193.html (8,407 bytes)
- 43. Re: [RTTY] With XP support ending... (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 13:21:11 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: One of the things holding me back from fldigi is the lack of direct FSK. Has that been remedied yet? 73, Bill W6WRT _________________________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00195.html (7,987 bytes)
- 44. [RTTY] rRe: With XP support ending... (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 23:26:55 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: Depends whether you worship at the Church of the Open Source or the Church of the Heavenly Gates. 73, Bill W6WRT ____________________________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00204.html (8,849 bytes)
- 45. [RTTY] Posting option available (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:52:34 -0800
- Just a reminder for those who have multiple subscriptions to the RTTY Reflector: 1. You can have as many subscriptions as you like as long as they each have a different email address. 2. Any of your
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00237.html (7,142 bytes)
- 46. Re: [RTTY] The Empire and a satifaction guarantee (score: 1)
- Author: William Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 00:06:57 -0800
- This appears to be spam. The sender has been placed on moderated status. 73, Bill W6WRT RTTY List Administrator at contesting.com I found within a please renew your membership letter a quite amusing
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00347.html (7,435 bytes)
- 47. Re: [RTTY] The trailing blank or 2 (score: 1)
- Author: William Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 19:00:53 -0800
- If you're using N1MM, there is a check-box option to Remove Excess Line Feeds. I think that's the wording. It will print one line feed but strips out any more than that. But as others pointed out, th
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00355.html (7,745 bytes)
- 48. Re: [RTTY] FT5ZM RTTY is a zoo (score: 1)
- Author: William Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
- Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 23:31:06 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: And they can't spell either. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00042.html (8,868 bytes)
- 49. Re: [RTTY] FT5ZM RTTY is a zoo (score: 1)
- Author: William Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
- Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 23:35:11 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: How would you guarantee the dupe Q was made by the actual station and not some joker out to mess you up? 73, Bill W6WRT _____________________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00043.html (8,210 bytes)
- 50. [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
- Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:25:41 -0800
- Here's something I've been thinking about for quite a while. I'd like to hear what you think. Presently, the practice in pileups is for the DX station to call and answer on his same frequency, and th
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00053.html (8,652 bytes)
- 51. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
- Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 15:48:21 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: That problem already exists with the idiot answering callers on the DX freq and pretending to be him. I've heard it a few times. Astute callers will observe
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00061.html (7,932 bytes)
- 52. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
- Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 15:58:43 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) Regards, Anthony (N2KI) REPLY: That problem already exists. I've heard the slim call on the DX frequency, pretending to be him. You usually can tell a difference in
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00062.html (8,826 bytes)
- 53. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
- Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 07:18:29 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: I've thought it through as much as I can without actually doing it. Even simple gear would support this as long as long as the rig has two VFOs. Here's how I
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00070.html (10,265 bytes)
- 54. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
- Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 16:36:36 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) Are there any 'hints' for working DX from a mobile (I have a camper with RTTY capability) or QRP ? REPLY: nobody moves in on you. Everything else is secondary. 73,
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00083.html (9,663 bytes)
- 55. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
- Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 16:42:37 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) Susan K5DU REPLY: QYF doesn't even need a split button. Even an ancient rig with only one VFO can do it. Just locate the DX calling CQ, move up to a clear spot and
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00085.html (9,306 bytes)
- 56. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
- Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 16:46:27 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: Exactly. That is priority #1 whether working conventional split or QYF. And don't pay too much attention to his "UP 2-5. Almost always they tune outside that
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00086.html (9,794 bytes)
- 57. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
- Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 16:53:48 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) Susan asks about those who can't figure out the split button. Another, more common question: What if the folks don't have dual receive? Or more to the point, if the
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00088.html (9,716 bytes)
- 58. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (mobile) de VE9AA (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
- Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 16:59:45 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: One of my most memorable QSOs happened while I was idly listening to 160 CW. I heard a fairly strong station calling CQ and signing /M. This is CW, remember.
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00090.html (8,073 bytes)
- 59. Re: [RTTY] change in pile up procedure (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
- Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 17:06:30 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: Again, working QYF you don't work split. A rig with only one VFO can do it just fine. 1. Find the DX station. 2. Move up to a clear frequency. 3. Keep callin
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00091.html (7,712 bytes)
- 60. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
- Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 17:10:43 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) On 2/4/2014 4:54 PM, Nelson Moyer wrote: The tactic that has worked best for me is to find the station the DX is working, then find a clear frequency near the edge
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00092.html (9,377 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu