Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat1242@ispwest.com: 330 ]

Total 330 documents matching your query.

241. Re: [RTTY] Suggestion for upcoming RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:00:49 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ It's not a question of smart or dumb decoders, it's an inherent issue with Unshift On Space (USOS). What you are doing by sending d
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00359.html (10,144 bytes)

242. Re: [RTTY] dashes vs. no dashes (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 15:03:57 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Actually, it's just the opposite. NOT using dashes helps with sync. With UnShift On Space enabled, the default in nearly all TNCs a
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00368.html (7,827 bytes)

243. Re: [RTTY] Suggestion for upcoming RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 15:06:22 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Even better would be FNN OR OR. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contestin
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00369.html (9,060 bytes)

244. Re: [RTTY] Suggestion for upcoming RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 15:12:48 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I disagree. With no spaces, you lose the advantage of USOS, even with all numbers. If the FIGS shift character gets munged at the s
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00370.html (8,963 bytes)

245. Re: [RTTY] dashes (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 06:37:36 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Damned right! :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00004.html (6,916 bytes)

246. Re: [RTTY] dashes vs. no dashes (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 11:46:23 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: <snip> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ An excellent explanation, Richard. Those whose motto is KISS will follow this rule: Dash = bad. Space = good. USOS on TX = y
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00009.html (7,572 bytes)

247. Re: [RTTY] Suggestion for upcoming RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 14:16:27 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Correct. A long time ago someone commented that the dash was present in both LTRS and FIGS case and I assumed that to be true. Not
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00015.html (8,305 bytes)

248. Re: [RTTY] Suggestion for upcoming RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 14:22:15 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ That depends on what you mean by "better". If you mean faster sending, you are correct. If you mean more likely to get through, not
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00017.html (8,371 bytes)

249. Re: [RTTY] dashes vs. no dashes (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 17:35:29 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Right you are. Trouble is, with a computer you don't need an "enter" key. It's called word wrap and most all programs do it by defa
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00020.html (7,871 bytes)

250. Re: [RTTY] Everyday RTTY Software (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 15:06:50 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ That's what I use. An advantage is that if you want to run a contest program such as WriteLog or N1MM Logger, MMTTY is already inst
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00034.html (7,333 bytes)

251. Re: [RTTY] VE7QO SK (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 19:11:09 -0800
61 log entries, all that will ever be. :-( 73 OM, it was a pleasure while it lasted. Bill W6WRT ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ORIGINAL MESSAGE: At 02:18 PM 1/6/2006, Ronald A. Stu
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00063.html (7,385 bytes)

252. Re: [RTTY] dashes be gone (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:42 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A CR at the beginning of the line is a must IMO, but at the end a space is better than a CR. Why? Because if the other guy is chasi
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00086.html (7,401 bytes)

253. Re: [RTTY] New RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:44:14 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Been there, done that. I don't recall anyone not wanting new blood in the hobby, just that many of the newbies had a "bad attitude"
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00087.html (7,382 bytes)

254. Re: [RTTY] N2KI Round Up (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 18:22:25 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ One man's whine is another man's attempt to improve things. Which way do you think this gentleman is leaning? :-) Bill, W6WRT _____
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00096.html (7,063 bytes)

255. [RTTY] W6WRT does the Roundup (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 18:39:47 -0800
ARRL RTTY Roundup Call: W6WRT Operator(s): W6WRT Station: W6WRT Class: Single Op LP QTH: CA Operating Time (hrs): 19 Summary: Band QSOs -- 80: 84 40: 143 20: 306 15: 220 10: 54 -- Total: 807 State/Pr
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00098.html (7,827 bytes)

256. Re: [RTTY] It seems that there were some stations,during ARRL RTTY Roundup, on 14.100MHz (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 18:45:14 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: <snip> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Just for the record, there is no "CW portion", at least in the US. CW is allowed in any part of any band. There IS however,
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00099.html (7,564 bytes)

257. Re: [RTTY] ARRL RU (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 19:26:15 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Is it my imagination or am I getting old and forgetful? Or both? I don't recall the 3830 website sending these individual scores to
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00102.html (7,455 bytes)

258. Re: [RTTY] 1st rtty conest/ 1st contest! (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:45:26 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Welcome to the contesting world, Harold! Way better results than my first contest, I'll tell you! Bill, W6WRT _____________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00116.html (7,232 bytes)

259. Re: [RTTY] <CR> and off-freq observation comments (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:58:59 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I've noticed it too. I'm sure it happens because of incorrect use of AFC. Here's how: Station A has his AFC on while S&Ping, but is
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00119.html (8,927 bytes)

260. Re: [RTTY] ARRL RU (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:09:08 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Yes, I know that in his case. It was my score that triggered my original question. I received a copy from the web page that apparen
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00121.html (7,969 bytes)

Current List: 241 - 260
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]
This search system is powered by Namazu