Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat@outlook.com: 454 ]

Total 454 documents matching your query.

321. Re: [RTTY] Any word on Makrothen logs? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 21:21:05 +0000
I think it's great that a number of folks have offered to take up responsibility for the Makrothen contest, but there is a cautionary note when it is done by an individual. Over time, people either g
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00122.html (9,280 bytes)

322. Re: [RTTY] g0azt Eddie (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 05:55:06 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Ray Ortgiesen, WF1B was the creator of the first truly successful software for RTTY contesting - RTTY by WF1B. It was a DOS program which worked beautifu
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00145.html (8,453 bytes)

323. Re: [RTTY] Lack of 40m RTTY Activity (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 01:44:55 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Just a guess based on my own operating: The higher bands are more attractive when they're open. DX signals are stronger and more plentiful and more easil
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00159.html (8,388 bytes)

324. Re: [RTTY] No RX (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 02:18:36 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: In the MMTTY soundcard setup, be sure you have the right input selected. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00162.html (7,538 bytes)

325. Re: [RTTY] All set (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 20:35:13 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: 10 meters has been good today, lots of JT65 activity. Let's hope it keeps up. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00182.html (7,318 bytes)

326. Re: [RTTY] All set (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 02:08:19 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Your tones might be reversed. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contestin
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00186.html (8,181 bytes)

327. Re: [RTTY] my thoughts on the JARTS exchange... (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 02:29:26 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: If Amateur Radio was only about talking to other people I would agree, but it's more than that. There is a certain fascination in using these magical "ra
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00206.html (8,437 bytes)

328. Re: [RTTY] New amplifier announced (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 01:20:59 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: It will be interesting to see. The pair of transistors used costs about $400, far less than an Eimac 8877, and of course there is no expensive high power
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00211.html (8,829 bytes)

329. Re: [RTTY] New amplifier announced (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 03:57:51 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I wondered about that too. 100% duty cycle should mean just that, with no qualifiers such as ICAS. I will get that clarified before I buy one. 73, Bill W
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00216.html (8,402 bytes)

330. Re: [RTTY] New amplifier announced (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 18:03:45 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I used to own one. Its main drawback is it won't do RTTY at full legal limit. After about ten seconds it kicks back to mid-power. 73, Bill W6WRT ________
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00271.html (8,554 bytes)

331. Re: [RTTY] New amplifier announced (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 18:24:44 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Yes, I owned one of those too. I got rid of it for two reasons: 1. It won't do legal limit. 2. A power supply repair is over $2000. Fortunately I never h
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00280.html (9,244 bytes)

332. Re: [RTTY] New amplifier announced (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 19:51:55 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Yes, most amps, even those rated as "legal limit" will only do that on CW or SSB. Only a few will do legal limit on RTTY for any extended period of time.
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00282.html (8,985 bytes)

333. Re: [RTTY] New amplifier announced (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 19:55:54 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I don't know that there is anything unique about them other than they will handle legal limit. There are several filters and filter kits on the market, b
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00283.html (9,355 bytes)

334. Re: [RTTY] New amplifier announced (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 22:17:13 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: When you say "full power", isn't that just 400 watts in your country? Or am I out of date? 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00286.html (8,869 bytes)

335. Re: [RTTY] New Radio (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 22:22:16 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: If you can afford it, the FlexRadio 6xxx series is a better choice IMO. Especially if you have a second monitor to show off the spectrum display to its f
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00287.html (9,601 bytes)

336. Re: [RTTY] FSK is bad? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:45:28 +0000
All this FSK vs AFSK discussion has me wondering. I run a FlexRadio 6300 - the basic model - and I'm wondering which it uses. It looks and feels like FSK but I'm not sure. Does anyone know? 73, Bill
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00326.html (7,638 bytes)

337. Re: [RTTY] FSK is bad? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:58:13 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: It should be pointed out that this pressure to use only low power has nothing to do with the mode, but rather the wide bandwidth at the receiver end to e
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00327.html (8,761 bytes)

338. Re: [RTTY] FSK is bad? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:07:39 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: The basic RTTY signal is a carrier, frequency modulated by a square wave, and if the corners of the square wave are really "sharp", the harmonic content
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00330.html (9,238 bytes)

339. Re: [RTTY] FSK is bad? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 23:35:02 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: MMTTY allows you to choose from many different tone pairs in FSK mode. The difference is not really in the transmitter, its in the receiver. For years I
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00346.html (8,685 bytes)

340. Re: [RTTY] So...2125 or 1275 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 01:26:52 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Either one, 2Tone does both. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00354.html (8,902 bytes)

Current List: 321 - 340
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu