Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat@copper.net: 581 ]

Total 581 documents matching your query.

381. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 08:08:13 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:29:36 -0600, "Jay Kloss" <n4cbk.jay@gmail.com> wrote: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- You would lose that bet, Jay. This issue has been debated for a couple of years on t
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00126.html (8,848 bytes)

382. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 08:11:40 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- True, radio contesting can never be made perfectly equal. Does that mean we should not try? Should there be no HP/LP class? No Multi-op class? No Multi-transmitt
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00127.html (8,669 bytes)

383. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 08:18:28 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- AA5AU has also commented that with SO2R, his score improved about 40% above his SO1R score. That is a comparable advantage to HP vs LP, and like HP vs LP, deserv
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00128.html (8,737 bytes)

384. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 08:56:09 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Please, Joe! For the ten billionth time, nobody wants you to "eschew" any of your skills. We just want them to be in their appropriate category. Running an amp i
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00130.html (8,745 bytes)

385. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 08:58:13 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- And the horse is still alive and well. Remarkable animal, eh? Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com ht
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00131.html (8,242 bytes)

386. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 09:04:28 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- You could not be more wrong if you tried. You just don't get it. For the ten billionth and two time, nobody is against SO2R. We just want it in its own category.
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00132.html (7,366 bytes)

387. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 09:54:59 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 12:34:26 -0400, "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com> wrote: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- That's what we are doing. Contest sponsors read these posts. Bill W6WRT _____________
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00136.html (8,613 bytes)

388. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 18:18:41 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 17:09:47 -0500, "Ron K5DJ" <k5dj@austin.rr.com> wrote: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- The category you describe above is "assisted". That is already a separate category in
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00145.html (8,613 bytes)

389. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 18:24:51 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Don't confuse the number of radios with the number of boxes on your desk. You have two radios in one box. One defining characteristic of SO1R is that when the TX
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00146.html (9,221 bytes)

390. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 18:27:29 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Iridium used to be the densest material on Earth. I believe I have found something denser. :-) Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY ma
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00147.html (9,468 bytes)

391. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 18:29:46 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Who decided that was "the premiere category". Multi/multi kicks butt every time. Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTT
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00148.html (7,956 bytes)

392. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 07:02:34 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- "This is a canard"? Joe, this is the main reason people operate two radios - to look for mults and new stations while their TX is on. Why else would they operate
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00155.html (8,996 bytes)

393. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 07:05:03 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- You're confusing "premiere" with "most popular", but since it is purely a matter of opinion anyway, I'll let it go. Bill W6WRT __________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00156.html (8,122 bytes)

394. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 57, Issue 23 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 07:23:16 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- You have hit the nail on the head, Bill. Contests are often won or lost by a one or two percent difference in the score. Since two-radio operation gives a far gr
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00157.html (8,598 bytes)

395. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 06:13:08 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I agree with your statement above for CW and SSB. Two-radio operation is most common on RTTY and that is what Joe and I and the others are kicking back and forth
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00172.html (8,062 bytes)

396. Re: [RTTY] Amplifier Tube (s) (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:09:33 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:40:10 -0400, "Glenn VA3DX" <va3dx@sympatico.ca> wrote: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- If you don't get any replies, you might try the ham_amplifiers group on Yahoo. Lots
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00222.html (7,276 bytes)

397. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:14:35 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I forgot that W4TV rarely if ever operates RTTY contests. In my log of 42,203 RTTY QSOs, W4TV does not appear even once. Bill W6WRT _____________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00223.html (9,349 bytes)

398. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:18:36 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- The difference between the modes is that CW and SSB have to be done in real time, whereas RTTY is printed on the screen(s) and the op can focus on one screen for
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00224.html (8,867 bytes)

399. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:33:49 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:57:00 -0500, "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com> wrote: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- A partial explanation is that one of the most vocal opponents of the SO1R category ha
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00225.html (9,177 bytes)

400. Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:52:50 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- That argument could also be applied to HP vs LP and would be equally fallacious. If a piece of hardware gives a significant advantage to a station, like an ampli
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00230.html (10,166 bytes)

Current List: 381 - 400
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu