- 241. Re: [RTTY] More on Dupes (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:07:17 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- We all have the busted call problem from time to time where the other station stubbornly fails to recognize it as busted. I have a macro that says: "MY CALL IS W
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00223.html (7,390 bytes)
- 242. [RTTY] WAS on 6m RTTY? (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:11:56 -0800
- Has anyone worked all states on six meter RTTY? If not, who will be first? That would be quite a feather in one's cap, wouldn't it? Bill, W6WRT 0 down, 50 to go :-) __________________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00224.html (6,660 bytes)
- 243. Re: [RTTY] RTTY/Power Kenwood TS-570 (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:13:38 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- What is the SWR of your antenna without the tuner? Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00339.html (7,094 bytes)
- 244. Re: [RTTY] WPX RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 09:20:38 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Excellent advice Dick, but I have one tiny nitpick: "QRZ" should only be used when someone is actually calling you. At the end of your TU message you don't know
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00057.html (7,817 bytes)
- 245. Re: [RTTY] n1mm/KAM plux (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 13:03:22 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- May I offer some advice? Retire the KAM Plus and use MMTTY. I have compared the performance of the two side by side and MMTTY is noticeably better at digging wea
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00090.html (7,926 bytes)
- 246. Re: [RTTY] RTTY is getting lower and lower in frequency on 20meters. (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 08:05:04 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- A good part of the PSK problem is the use of the waterfall tuning system. The PSK'ers open up their receivers as wide as possible and then wonder why one loud RT
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00180.html (8,942 bytes)
- 247. Re: [RTTY] hyphen or no hyphen (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 08:25:19 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I would recommend not sending "KN", "K", "BK" or anything of the like. Those are valuable prosigns for CW because they make it clear that it's your turn to trans
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00245.html (8,349 bytes)
- 248. Re: [RTTY] PSK and waterfall (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 08:38:58 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Deep down in my heart I am a DXer first, contester a close second and rag chewer a distant third. It saddens me to see the "PSK is a low power mode" mantra repea
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00246.html (8,048 bytes)
- 249. Re: [RTTY] RTTY is getting lower and lower in frequency on 20meters. (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 08:51:07 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Well, SOMEBODY out there is whining! I guarantee you if anyone fires up with 1500 watts of RTTY on 14071, the complaints will be loud and clear, and that's a dir
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00248.html (9,515 bytes)
- 250. Re: [RTTY] 160 (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:11:40 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- That just adds to the challenge. I have six states worked on 160 RTTY including the rare South Dakota and am looking for more. Don't be discouraged. What we real
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00275.html (7,132 bytes)
- 251. Re: [RTTY] hyphen or no hyphen (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:18:28 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- By "silent mode" I assume you mean with the speaker off? You're missing one of the most beautiful sounds in ham radio... my humble opinion, of course. :-) 73, Bi
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00277.html (8,551 bytes)
- 252. Re: [RTTY] PSK and waterfall (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:23:31 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I take that to mean that ten watts overdriven is tolerable where 600 watts overdriven is not? I would agree, but that's an argument against overdriving, not agai
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00278.html (7,807 bytes)
- 253. Re: [RTTY] Starting Out (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:31:30 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I think all of your questions can be answered at AA5AU's excellent website: http://www.aa5au.com/rtty.html Read it over and if you have any more questions (you w
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00279.html (7,146 bytes)
- 254. Re: [RTTY] 160 (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:31:42 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I would love to see such a contest, but I think a club or similar organization should sponsor it. I wonder if TARA would be interested? 73, Bill W6WRT __________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00286.html (7,373 bytes)
- 255. Re: [RTTY] 160 (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 08:45:16 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Count me in on this one! I volunteer to do log checking or whatever TARA would like me to help with. First however, is choice of contest format. I would recommen
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00312.html (8,456 bytes)
- 256. Re: [RTTY] hyphen or no hyphen (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:58:20 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Bob is absolutely correct on this, although I have never seen it discussed before. An experienced RTTY operator can tell just by listening to the received signal
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00345.html (8,866 bytes)
- 257. Re: [RTTY] 160 (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:09:13 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Right now, it's catch-22. Since there are no 160 meter RTTY contests, not many stations are equipped for it. Since not many stations are equipped for it, there a
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00358.html (9,552 bytes)
- 258. Re: [RTTY] CQ QRM (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 08:10:55 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I've had the same experience several times. So much for the "gentleman's band". 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00432.html (7,212 bytes)
- 259. Re: [RTTY] Fw: RTTY presentation to radio club... (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 08:16:10 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Justone suggestion: In addition to the "live" presentation, have a one-page handout to give to everyone with some simple steps to getting started, including link
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00433.html (7,734 bytes)
- 260. Re: [RTTY] CQ QRM (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 08:33:22 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- If by "traditional frequencies" you mean 80 kHz up from the lower band edge, that would be fine with me for North America, but there is a problem with the freque
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00460.html (7,610 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu