Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat@copper.net: 581 ]

Total 581 documents matching your query.

201. Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] RTTY contest software (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 09:23:24 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- With the emphasis on "most of the time", that is quite true. If one is serious about contesting or DXing for that matter, one should try to get closer to "100% p
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00271.html (8,430 bytes)

202. Re: [RTTY] Filtering AFSK (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 09:34:18 -0700
I see you have received some good answers on how to deal with a rig that uses AFSK and can not narrow down the passband on SSB. Those suggestions will help. But... if you become a serious RTTY operat
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00272.html (7,677 bytes)

203. Re: [RTTY] ic756proIII (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 09:39:33 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 11:14:17 -0000, "Robert" <tf3tty@internet.is> wrote: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Probably the best RTTY radio ever made unless you want to get into commercial and/or mil
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00273.html (7,101 bytes)

204. Re: [RTTY] 746 for rtty? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:30:57 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- My experience was just the opposite. My IC-746PRO was damaged by a lightning strike, so I bought a Mark V FT-1000MP. Worst radio I ever had, main complaint was p
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00346.html (7,389 bytes)

205. Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] RTTY contest software (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:47:07 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- very impressive. I think the time has come for me to try cocoaModem. I know nothing about Apple computers, however. Could you advise me on what to look for in a
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00347.html (10,022 bytes)

206. Re: [RTTY] ic756proIII (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:59:35 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- The bandscope is also excellent for finding when a band is open in the first place, especially at this low point of the solar cycle. Just go to ten meters and wa
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00349.html (8,132 bytes)

207. Re: [RTTY] diddle (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:58:01 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Just so we're sure we're using the right words, "diddle" is the character sent when you are not actively typing; in other words, it is an idle signal which conve
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00398.html (7,582 bytes)

208. Re: [RTTY] Welcome to NCJ! (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2006 15:20:04 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Amen! For those new to RTTY contesting, you can not do better than to listen to Don and take his advice. Over the years there have been a handful of truly stando
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-11/msg00017.html (7,196 bytes)

209. Re: [RTTY] spend me some yards about RF Amps (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2006 19:28:29 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I used the Heathkit version, the SB-1000, for several years and it was a good performer. I eventually modified it for six meters and still use it there occasiona
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-11/msg00021.html (7,439 bytes)

210. Re: [RTTY] Icom 746 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 10:43:46 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Which version of the '746 do you have? If it's the PRO version, I'd hang on to it. I've owned both it and the 'MP and the ICOM was much better, IMO. It does not
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-11/msg00049.html (7,180 bytes)

211. Re: [RTTY] Enter in macro's (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 07:56:39 -0800
Tom has it exactly right. One or two {ENTER}s at the beginning of a macro but only spaces at the end. One of the little subtleties that makes the art and science of macros so fascinating. I've been d
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-11/msg00071.html (7,395 bytes)

212. Re: [RTTY] CR (returns) (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:51:00 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- An even better clue: No more carrier. Please guys, no "K" or "CR" at the end of a macro. They are not necessary and in the case of the CR, can actually waste tim
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-11/msg00087.html (7,625 bytes)

213. Re: [RTTY] New RTTY set up - comments pse. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:35:58 -0800
A few thoughts in no particular order: 1. Retire the PK-232 and use MMTTY. It is better at digging weak signals out of the noise, as many have testified here before. It also has a plethora of filter/
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-11/msg00089.html (9,499 bytes)

214. Re: [RTTY] 160m TARA RTTY Melee (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 07:58:51 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I like it. What frequency? My amp is on the fritz but I'll see what I can do barefoot. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing l
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-11/msg00147.html (7,036 bytes)

215. Re: [RTTY] 160m TARA RTTY Melee (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:47:07 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Do you mean: 1. Because it's the TARA contest? 2. Because it's the same time as the CW 160 contest. 3. Or because it's RTTY on 160 meters? Please clarify. Bill,
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-11/msg00155.html (8,145 bytes)

216. Re: [RTTY] 160m TARA RTTY Melee (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 08:45:13 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I agree with everything Shelby says, but... I'll be on 160 RTTY anyway. Since my amp is down, 100 watts shouldn't bother anybody very much. See you diehards ther
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-12/msg00005.html (7,802 bytes)

217. Re: [RTTY] 160 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 19:49:12 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Too bad. Perhaps there should be a dedicated 160 meter RTTY contest? Which brings up another question: Has anyone ever worked all states on 160 meter RTTY? How a
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-12/msg00008.html (7,006 bytes)

218. Re: [RTTY] RITTY (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 09:57:51 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- It's a well-known bug. Update to version 4.54 and the problem will go away. You may have some trouble contacting Brian via email. I'd suggest a post card explain
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-12/msg00019.html (7,357 bytes)

219. Re: [RTTY] Fw: Have RTTY ops become SSB ops? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:01:56 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- This has little to do with ham radio. I can't speak for Canada, but this style of social interaction has become pretty common in America. What used to be common
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-12/msg00045.html (7,326 bytes)

220. [RTTY] Poor QSLing practices (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:56:50 -0800
I plead guilty to being a poor QSL'er with cards, but all my QSOs are on LoTW. It's mostly because I live in the least needed state in the least needed country in the world. I often get requests for
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-12/msg00062.html (9,516 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 220
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu