Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat@copper.net: 581 ]

Total 581 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [RTTY] Com port gurus? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:23:10 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Thanks, Ed. My single cards are using IRQ 16 and 17. I'll install the dual card and see what they come up with. 73, Bill W6WRT __________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00094.html (7,380 bytes)

182. Re: [RTTY] CQ WW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 08:55:08 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- If you don't get the answer here, there is a WriteLog reflector where I'm sure you would. Go to www.contestng.com and scroll down, looking on the left side of th
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00098.html (6,542 bytes)

183. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: [digitalradio] RTTY Hall of Shame (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:35:16 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I emailed him a week ago suggesting he had a virus or trojan horse. He replied he would check it out but apparently has had no success. Incidentally, the "from"
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00174.html (10,436 bytes)

184. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: [digitalradio] RTTY Hall of Shame (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:41:21 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I use them all the time, but I don't see their frequency as sacred. Anybody, including you, me or the IARU can set up a band plan. Only if it is adopted by the F
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00175.html (9,753 bytes)

185. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: [digitalradio] RTTY Hall of Shame (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:49:55 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- How about an STA allowing operation just outside the amateur band? 13.999 and similar freqs for other bands wouldn't bother anyone, I'd think, and would serve a
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00176.html (9,634 bytes)

186. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: [digitalradio] RTTY Hall of Shame (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:57:32 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- You're missing the point. A few minutes listening to beacons will tell you whether a band is open to VU4 or not. Without the beacons, you would could listen for
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00177.html (8,857 bytes)

187. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: [digitalradio] RTTY Hall of Shame (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:11:34 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I would call that a no-fault situation. :-) Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contes
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00179.html (10,191 bytes)

188. Re: [RTTY] [RTTY Hall of Shame (bad subject) (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:51:11 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- No it does not, for the following reasons: 1. The non-beacon radio traffic may be from an unknown location. Callsigns can not necessarily be trusted. 2. The non-
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00197.html (9,629 bytes)

189. Re: [RTTY] IARU Beacons (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:04:45 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- And it never did you the courtesy of answering, did it? How rude! :-) Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesti
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00198.html (6,965 bytes)

190. Re: [RTTY] Makrothen RTTY Contest (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:08:34 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Participation has been surprisingly strong right from the beginning. I like it because it is a true distance contest, meaning your score is based only on the dis
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00236.html (7,594 bytes)

191. Re: [RTTY] IARU and 14100 Beacon QRM from Digital Signals (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 10:46:02 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- If we want to be really serious about this, contest rules should declare a "guard band" around the beacons, and stations violating it should be publicly disquali
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00006.html (8,089 bytes)

192. Re: [RTTY] Answering CQ's (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 18:03:47 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I should point out that putting your call first is not for you, it's so other stations on frequency will know who is being called. It happens often that two stat
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00020.html (8,820 bytes)

193. Re: [RTTY] IARU and 14100 Beacon QRM from Digital Signals (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 18:06:43 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- How well is it working so far? Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mail
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00021.html (8,986 bytes)

194. Re: [RTTY] Answering CQ's (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:14:41 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I've done probably 100 or more RTTY contests in the last ten years and I'm still learning too. There is hardly a contest where I don't tweak at least one macro.
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00086.html (8,515 bytes)

195. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Screwed by FCC? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 09:43:33 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- No, RTTY is a binary (two state) mode, but it is not digital, any more than CW is. People have fallen into the trap of thinking that because a signal has two sta
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00127.html (8,864 bytes)

196. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Screwed by FCC? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 08:45:25 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- For a signal to be "digital", the data has to represent numbers. That is what the word "digital" means. In the case of RTTY, the bits are purely analog signals,
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00141.html (8,957 bytes)

197. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Screwed by FCC? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 09:33:57 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- If CW is digital, it then follows that dit-dah and dit-dit have the same numeric value and are therefore the same character. Remember, in a digital system, the p
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00143.html (8,639 bytes)

198. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Screwed by FCC? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 10:52:54 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Joe, you could not be more mistaken. For a mode to be "digital", the states have to represent numbers. In your examples which follow your quote above you have ta
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00147.html (10,016 bytes)

199. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Screwed by FCC? (language lesson) (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 10:55:42 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- So that well-known middle finger sign was perhaps the first digital communication? I have a whole new respect for our ancestors. :-) Bill, W6WRT ________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00148.html (8,666 bytes)

200. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Screwed by FCC? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 11:23:00 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I'll defer to your far greater expertise in such matters my friend, but I am enjoying the mental picture of the quantum engineer down at the local hardware store
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00151.html (9,025 bytes)

Current List: 181 - 200
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu