Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:david@levinecentral.com: 154 ]

Total 154 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [RTTY] software (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:28:21 -0500
I don't think anyone is insisting on free, but today most applications have a way to test drive them. They are either restricted to a particular amount of time, reduced capacity (can only enter xx co
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00440.html (16,675 bytes)

82. Re: [RTTY] 2011 RTTY Roundup - 3830 Claimed Scores 14Jan2011 (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 15:12:57 -0500
Depending on the contest, a single op assisted (using a packet cluster) = multi-single. It could be many were single ops were just running assisted. Single Operator entrants may not use any form of s
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00538.html (8,344 bytes)

83. Re: [RTTY] XE Contest (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 06:18:13 -0500
Looks like on the page at http://www.fmre.org.mx/concursos/ there is a link to 2010 Scoring XE RTTY Contest which is a Word document. The direct link to the Word document is * http://www.fmre.org.mx/
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00018.html (7,888 bytes)

84. Re: [RTTY] 2010 XE RTTY cpmtest - error in final scores (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 08:06:11 -0500
Check out http://lists.contesting.com/_3830/2010-02/msg00627.html and you'll see your score to 3830 was what the XE RTTY results reflect. K2DSL - David _______________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00021.html (8,735 bytes)

85. Re: [RTTY] Funny Back to Back QSOs in WPX (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 21:15:19 -0500
This has happened multiple times where back-to-back calls for someone calling CQ were K2DSL (mine) and K2DLS who also lives in NJ. Maybe it has even happened more then I realize if I was the first ca
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00105.html (8,703 bytes)

86. [RTTY] Unknown Calls - Who's behind the curtain? (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 22:19:26 -0500
There are 3 calls I worked that I can't find any evidence of in the various databases. I just want to update my master log program for name, grid/location, etc. If I can't find anything I'll just mak
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00110.html (7,218 bytes)

87. Re: [RTTY] Upside down (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 06:58:12 -0500
Like K0RC posted, I worked more Alaska stations this weekend then I think I ever worked in a contest. And like K0RC, the only state remaining I need on 80m is Alaska but alas, no 80m Alaska stations
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00119.html (8,954 bytes)

88. Re: [RTTY] K or carriage return (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:35:57 -0500
I really didn't want to jump into this thread but what the heck. What P49X and some others do is beyond amazing to me. But the milliseconds they might theoretically gain by not sending a space and ru
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00133.html (9,025 bytes)

89. Re: [RTTY] K or carriage return (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:12:44 -0500
Peter, I completely agree with you. I'm tired of seeing: CQ WPX K2DSL K2DSL CQ HK3XX K3XX7G4 (Where do I click to get his call?) K3XX 599 234 234 K3XX VK2DSL 599 123 123 (Did he get my call correct?)
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00138.html (10,697 bytes)

90. Re: [RTTY] Nice Score Summary? (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 06:45:40 -0500
In N1MM you can do it by clicking the File menu and then Export followed by Print Score Summary to File. N1MM doesn't show the operating time in the score summary. If you want that you go to the View
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00191.html (9,071 bytes)

91. Re: [RTTY] 10 meters in naqp (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:24:05 -0500
I'll take a WV on any band!!! I flipped to 10m once so far and worked CA and AZ (K6LL actually) from NJ on my wire dipole. David - K2DSL _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing l
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00344.html (8,277 bytes)

92. [RTTY] Keyboard vs Mouse (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 08:09:44 -0500
I hope Bill doesn't mind that I pulled his 3830 soapbox comment out and started a thread on it. I was interested what the rest of the group (and we all know it isn't a shy group!) thought of the subj
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00365.html (8,786 bytes)

93. [RTTY] GEROGE vs GEORGE (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 08:21:50 -0500
Hopefully no one takes this as cheating or publishing information to impact the outcome of the contest. I'm doing this because I've run into this multiple times in a RTTY contest before with the late
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00366.html (7,654 bytes)

94. Re: [RTTY] GEROGE vs GEORGE (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:33:50 -0500
Jamie, Yes it was TOM vs T0M and people did get dinged for that one initially. Anyone with T0M (with a zero) didn't have their contact counted because it was submitted as TOM (with the letter) vs wha
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00370.html (10,248 bytes)

95. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Most Wanted Survey 2011 (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 11:17:31 -0500
Thanks for doing this! Maybe an option for "check all" would have been less clicking (unchecking) at least for me being newer and with 125 confirmed ;-) This showed me I have a lot of worked but unco
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00378.html (9,310 bytes)

96. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 20:29:50 -0500
Saw this a couple of times... somename somename IN OH K2DSL - David _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00393.html (8,180 bytes)

97. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 06:56:49 -0500
Phil, There are 2 things a S&Per needs when they come across a line - your call and an indication you are the calling station. If your last line is "AD1C TU QRZ?" then if a S&Per tunes your frequency
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00408.html (10,310 bytes)

98. Re: [RTTY] NAQP RTTY RULES Non-North America (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:05:13 -0500
I just emailed Mark K6UFO about this. The rules at http://www.ncjweb.com/naqprules.php show a non-NA station sends just their name. 10. Exchange: Operator name and station location (state, province o
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00002.html (10,055 bytes)

99. Re: [RTTY] NAQP RTTY RULES Non-North America (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:12:49 -0500
Looks like blank should be ok too. From the link Mark posted at http://www.ncjweb.com/naqplogguidance.php in the section on During the Contest: A blank or "DX" for the copied QTH is only acceptable f
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00003.html (10,314 bytes)

100. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:21:04 -0500
I agree and I'm sticking with YourCall TU MyCall CQ Sorry, but you have to wait for the TU after YourCall or you can tune away on YourCall if you want. K2DSL - David _________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00007.html (8,771 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
This search system is powered by Namazu