Mail Archive Search: <+from:david@levinecentral.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:david@levinecentral.com: 154 ]

Total 154 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [RTTY] RTTY contest questions and comments (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:48:40 -0400; During this past weekends contest, there were many times when an op calling CQ and responding to my call was obliterated by someone sending their call right over his report. Sometimes with my call si; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-09/msg00215.html (10,295 bytes)
42. Re: [RTTY] CQ to accept EQSL for awards (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 11:38:21 -0400; Yes, of course you can reject eQSL confirmations. Where you saw them listed is a red X or green checkmark. I only see those if there's no match on a QSO I uploaded from my logging program. A mismatch; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00035.html (9,750 bytes)
43. Re: [RTTY] CQ to accept EQSL for awards (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:37:06 -0400; Peter, How about taking a deep breathe. I don't think anything about LoTW or eQSL is worth getting very excited over. First, you don't really need to do anything and you can still use eQSL. It's like; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00039.html (9,419 bytes)
44. Re: [RTTY] NA SPRINT (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 15:29:55 -0400; I prefer sending the exchanges multiple times, not the individual elements of the exchange repeated. I figure if there's QRM for a moment the odds are the exchanges after each other have a better sho; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00047.html (7,683 bytes)
45. Re: [RTTY] Mak RTTY Contest bogus logs (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:51:06 -0400; I've received valid eQSL confirmations from this past weekends contest I haven't received any bogus eQSL contacts. I'd contact the club/call and see if they have an explanation. We'll see if I can sn; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00082.html (7,819 bytes)
46. [RTTY] JARTS RTTY Age Analysis (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:32:22 -0400; I wrote up a quick post about the analysis of ages received in my 348 contacts in the 2009 JARTS RTTY contest this past weekend. You can check it out at : http://www.k2dsl.com/2009/10/21/2009-jart-rt; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00144.html (6,637 bytes)
47. [RTTY] Craziest Round-Up Exchange? (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 13:21:15 -0500; Here's the craziest exchange I saw this weekend as a standard reply. Anyone find one more outrageous? The call sign was removed to protect the not-so-innocent. I jotted this call down during the cont; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00027.html (6,806 bytes)
48. Re: [RTTY] What abt LINE feed (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 08:58:28 -0500; I use N1MM so I'm not familiar with Writelog. Does it need 2 spaces after every call sign to recognize the info as a call or is it just if the last content in the macro is the call sign? Eg: xxxxx TU; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00076.html (9,400 bytes)
49. Re: [RTTY] What abt LINE feed (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 09:19:36 -0500; Tom, I would add a space at the end of {MYCALL} but I'm waiting to hear back if there needs to be 2 spaces per Dave's comment about Writelog. It looks like you have a space before {CALL} at the start; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00080.html (9,776 bytes)
50. Re: [RTTY] ARRL RTTY (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 20:26:41 -0500; Hank, If SO2R at times is advantageous, then it's advantageous. Not making it a different category based on some of the reasons below is like saying that using a packet spotting network and being ass; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00122.html (10,217 bytes)
51. Re: [RTTY] ARRL RTTY (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 20:59:10 -0500; No, I didn't mean DX. I copy/pasted from Hank's email. As for it being a DX contest, in my local club is a pretty well known RTTY op. He always kicks my butt but he has multiple radios, amps and beam; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00127.html (12,746 bytes)
52. Re: [RTTY] Dashes in Contest Reports (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:33:09 -0500; It seemed that the final consensus (or where the thread stopped) was to send it like : xxxxxx 123 123-123 to make everyone happy or maybe equally unhappy, whatever the case may be. I personally send:; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00272.html (12,502 bytes)
53. Re: [RTTY] Windows 7 and USB to Serial adapters (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:53:26 -0500; I'm looking to get a new computer and it might be a laptop which means no serial ports and I can't put in a serial card. I have a Kenwood TS-2000 so 1 serial connection is for rig control and I have; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00447.html (11,349 bytes)
54. Re: [RTTY] Edgeport 8 port usb to serial drivers (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 11:10:24 -0500; Thanks for the additional info John. According to the Digi support forums, it was last posted the beginning of Jan that Win7 signed drivers are anticipated in March. In the same thread someone else i; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00465.html (11,488 bytes)
55. [RTTY] Windows 7 & Serial/USB Experience (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:10:43 -0500; I put together a post on my experience with a new Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit notebook and using an Edgeport 8 port serial device. The results were great on the first attempt. http://www.k2dsl.com/; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00053.html (6,962 bytes)
56. Re: [RTTY] 30m RTTY (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:24:19 -0500; Dave, Check out http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/bandplan.html for a reference. 20m is probably the busiest band and it starts at 14.070 or so for PSK and 14.080 for RTTY. K2DSL - David _; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00227.html (10,267 bytes)
57. Re: [RTTY] Signalink USB and KENWOOD TS-2000 (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:09:39 -0400; RTTY/FSK mode on the TS-2000 is for FSK only. The SignaLink USB is a AFSK device. Try using USB mode for RTTY with the SignaLink. K2DSL - David _______________________________________________ RTTY ma; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-03/msg00115.html (7,882 bytes)
58. [RTTY] EA RTTY Contest - Log rejected (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 07:07:16 -0400; I submitted my EA RTTY log at the end of the contest and it immediately bounced back that the address wasn't valid. I then resubmitted it a couple hours later and it didn't immediately bounce back. T; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-04/msg00014.html (7,069 bytes)
59. Re: [RTTY] EA RTTY Contest - Log rejected (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 09:18:31 -0400; Never mind - found what the issue was. I guess VI also got put into the RST for what I sent so instead of 599 it had VI in there and I didn't notice when N1MM logged the exchange. Sorry for the mista; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-04/msg00015.html (7,798 bytes)
60. [RTTY] I won my 1st plaque! (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:03:59 -0400; The July 2010 QST came in the mail and as I was thumbing through the contest section I saw the results from the 2010 RTTY Roundup and there, in the sponsored plaque section for the Hudson division lo; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00302.html (7,668 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]