Mail Archive Search: <+from:dave.wilburn@verizon.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:dave.wilburn@verizon.net: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] CQ 'ing CQ WW RTTY (score: 1): Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 20:29:40 -0400; Greetings. Some what new to RTTY contesting. I have only been in a couple of small ones so far. This is my first big RTTY contesting, and first CQ WW RTTY. On top of that, I have a new call to break; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00129.html (7,203 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] CQ 'ing CQ WW RTTY (score: 1): Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:04:50 -0400; Thanks to everyone that replied on and off list. We lost power last night with the remnants of the storm coming ashore. I was in the middle of setting everything up. So will give it a try tonight. 73; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00144.html (7,935 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] CQWW RTTY Exchange (score: 1): Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:46:07 -0400; I can't get N1MM to send an RST. I have the latest file, and have 05 VA in the RST. But every macro that sends {EXCH} only sends 05 VA. David Wilburn NM4M ____________________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00156.html (9,958 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] [N1MM] N1MM Cabrillo format error (score: 1): Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:45:33 -0400; They should really consider how they write the rules then. http://www.cq-amateur-radio.com/RTTY_Rules_July2008ENTIRE.pdf Excerpt: VII. Exchange: Stations operating within the 48 continental United St; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00188.html (10,214 bytes)
5. [RTTY] CQ WW RTTY SOAB - LP NM4M (score: 1): Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 23:18:28 -0400; CQWWRTTY Score Summary Sheet Start Date : 2008-09-27 CallSign Used : NM4M Operator(s) : NM4M Operator Category : SINGLE-OP Band : ALL Power : LOW Mode : RTTY Default Exchange : 05 VA Gridsquare : FM1; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00194.html (8,121 bytes)
6. [RTTY] Why QR for the section???? (score: 1): Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 23:45:06 -0400; I hit EE3R a couple of times. They kept sending QR for their section. No one else seems to ask. So I ask. They just kept sending me their exchange. I didn't know what to do. The program (N1MM) certai; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00195.html (7,094 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] Why QR for the section???? (score: 1): Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 07:53:05 -0400; Thanks for the explanation. It was right after the 599 and space. If this is an issue interpreting letters and numbers, why is 599 correct, and the 14 is not? David Wilburn NM4M _____________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00207.html (10,559 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange (score: 1): Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 08:03:39 -0400; I too noticed some stations did not confirm, or clearly complete the QSO. I did accurately track the zones, I confirmed each, as I had 1 or 2 stations that sent zone info different that what was sugg; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00208.html (10,321 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange (score: 1): Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 08:10:56 -0400; One piece that I forgot to mention, that really made the contest for me, and is 90% of why I will be back. At one point I did not clear the buffers when I did not complete a QSO, and sent a French ca; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00210.html (10,605 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange (score: 1): Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:57:18 -0400; Good point. I know my old call (K4DGW) was in the SCP. Obviously, it being my first contest with the new call, it is not in there, thus I come up as a Unique. I noticed lots of requests for repeats,; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00217.html (9,446 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] CQWW exchange (score: 1): Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:04:19 -0400; Admittedly I'm the new guy here. But I have to say, I really liked seeing the other stations call in the. I mean they suggest putting CQ at the end of the CQ. If you roll up and see a CQ, and just th; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00257.html (11,800 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] Odd call (score: 1): Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:57:57 -0400; It must be working. You were noticeably louder than other signals when I worked you here in Virginia. David Wilburn NM4M _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contest; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00281.html (9,849 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] Rules broken (score: 1): Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 08:36:18 -0400; N1MM can do the exchange either way. I set the exchange up to exactly match the rules. The robot rejects the text. Open up N1MM, change the exchange, and have it regenerate the log. Now it matches wh; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00287.html (9,042 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] CQWW LotW (score: 1): Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 08:37:58 -0400; Congrats. I hit a Cuban station a while back, the first I have seen in LOTW. Still can't get a reply from him. David Wilburn NM4M _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTT; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00288.html (7,374 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] F4DX/V (score: 1): Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:54:06 -0400; I always understood /P to be portable, and /M to be mobile. Seems unlikely to mean that with a 5 el beam and two 1000mp's. What does it mean in this instance? David Wilburn NM4M _____________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-10/msg00010.html (8,228 bytes)
16. [RTTY] Signal on 10.101 RTTY? (score: 1): Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:49:41 -0400; There is currently a signal on 10.101, here in VA. It is much like RTTY but with a 425 hz spacing. I tried changing to this setting for the mark spacing, and text was displayed, but it was no compreh; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-10/msg00019.html (6,466 bytes)
17. [RTTY] Double buffers? (score: 1): Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:13:27 -0400; Where do I find out more about the additional buffer(s) that allow a station running, to reply to two stations, one after the other? -- David Wilburn NM4M http://www.nm4m.com ________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-10/msg00097.html (6,551 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] W7LR - Montana (score: 1): Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:13:39 -0400; Hate that I missed that one. David Wilburn NM4M _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-10/msg00098.html (7,243 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] Double buffers? (score: 1): Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 02:10:03 -0400; Great stuff, thanks. It is all about having the macro setup, and timing. I use N1MM / MMTTY. David Wilburn NM4M _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com h; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-10/msg00102.html (8,435 bytes)
20. [RTTY] RTTY - WAS -> And then there was one.... (score: 1): Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:11:32 -0400; ....looking for any stations in Maine, that use LOTW, for a RTTY QSO. Thanks es 73. -- David Wilburn NM4M http://www.nm4m.com My Current LOTW/WAS/DXCC status http://www.nm4m.com/WAS.DXCC.info.html __; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-10/msg00154.html (7,211 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]