- 41. [RTTY] ARRL RU Rules violation (score: 1)
- Author: "Junior" <charlesw_anders@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:48:37 -0600
- I sent my log in as a check log due to an apparent rules violation. When I worked the DX stations and tabbed over I was putting the serial number in the rst field. I caught the mistake Sunday first t
- /archives//html/RTTY/2008-01/msg00280.html (7,500 bytes)
- 42. Re: [RTTY] ARRL RU Rules violation (score: 1)
- Author: "Junior" <charlesw_anders@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:11:15 -0600
- Ed, Thanks. I'll keep that in mind when I go so2r.5 :) See you in the next one. With one eye on the monitor. Ed has answered for all. No need to flame away. Unless it makes you feel better. :( 73 Cha
- /archives//html/RTTY/2008-01/msg00283.html (10,824 bytes)
- 43. [RTTY] FW: arrl ru (score: 1)
- Author: "Junior" <charlesw_anders@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:08:22 -0600
- No rtty this trip. You dual hat type ops should get them on 40 phone. I have always had a "null" into that area of xu, xw and a52 on the other antennas. But since I put the beam up I have worked two
- /archives//html/RTTY/2008-01/msg00290.html (7,823 bytes)
- 44. [RTTY] FW: I need help !!! (score: 1)
- Author: "Junior" <charlesw_anders@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 06:49:17 -0600
- I now have a buffer that states "no diddles carrier only" for the contest. My apologies to the non guilty cw ops I falsely accuse. Except the one who came up and made ref to parts of my anatomy in th
- /archives//html/RTTY/2008-01/msg00328.html (8,338 bytes)
- 45. [RTTY] FW: RTTY WPX KK5OQ SOSB/20 HP (score: 1)
- Author: "Junior" <charlesw_anders@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:03:00 -0600
- CQ WW RTTY WPX Contest Call: KK5OQ Operator(s): KK5OQ Station: KK5OQ Class: SOSB/20 HP QTH: Operating Time (hrs): 25 Summary: Band QSOs Pts -- 80: 40: 20: 1201 2467 15: 10: -- Total: 1201 2467 Prefix
- /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00080.html (7,243 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu