- 1. Re: [RTTY] Mak RTTY Contest bogus logs (score: 1)
- Author: "B. Smith" <billn3xl@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 06:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
- Marc, I haven't seen any recently, but over the years I have seen very few suspicious QSLs. If I was active at the time, I try to figure out what happened and reject the QSL for the appropriate reaso
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00084.html (8,603 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] Problems uploading JARTS log (score: 1)
- Author: "B. Smith" <billn3xl@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 05:24:20 -0700 (PDT)
- Even a space in the wrong place can cause a reject. Try to check your Cabrillo with NotePad. Times ago a friend's log was rejected because of a row with: QSO instead of QSO: 73 Dan, I1-12387 Hello RT
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00154.html (8,021 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] Need to change GU0SUP setup (score: 1)
- Author: "B. Smith" <billn3xl@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 19:37:46 -0800 (PST)
- Hi Phil, 1. Make sure you disable automatic downloads for windows and your virus scan software. Manually do that stuff when you aren't playing radio. 2. You can set higher priority for your CW interf
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-12/msg00109.html (11,675 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] Dashes in Contest Reports (score: 1)
- Author: "B. Smith" <billn3xl@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 05:57:09 -0800 (PST)
- There was comment in a thread awhile back about a dash being an easier/faster decode than a space and recommended using it in place of a space to improve the data transmission. My preference has alwa
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00269.html (10,028 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RTTY] Really (score: 1)
- Author: "B. Smith" <billn3xl@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:31:48 -0800 (PST)
- Glenn, You might be competing with another station on the same freq that YOU can't hear but he can - the station wants to make sure YOU answer him.Ensuring that the line of communication is well esta
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00347.html (9,603 bytes)
- 6. Re: [RTTY] Dashes in Contest Reports (score: 1)
- Author: "B. Smith" <billn3xl@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 06:08:28 -0800 (PST)
- Bill N3XL Gentlemen, If the optimum "repeat" message is to use dash or space - whichever is opposite of your primary send, then is there an argument establishing the best primary (initial) send shoul
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00357.html (11,578 bytes)
- 7. Re: [RTTY] Re ZC4LI AMPS !! (score: 1)
- Author: "B. Smith" <billn3xl@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:19:26 -0800 (PST)
- This scenario is just an example of why perhaps both power and antenna capabilities should be the factors in determining the entry category. The entry categories that we have now in no way represent
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00139.html (12,275 bytes)
- 8. Re: [RTTY] Re ZC4LI AMPS !! (score: 1)
- Author: "B. Smith" <billn3xl@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:24:58 -0800 (PST)
- Complaining about rules is silly, when the antenna has as much to do with radiated power as does the transmitter power output, and antennas are ignored by 99% of the contest rules. Since this is the
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00195.html (12,291 bytes)
- 9. Re: [RTTY] power and antennas (was ZC4LI) (score: 1)
- Author: "B. Smith" <billn3xl@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 20:42:57 -0800 (PST)
- Interesting that you recognize antenna significance in your rules. But why not power too? A quick take the top performers in each category tells me that beamers average 40% more effective than the li
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00208.html (15,172 bytes)
- 10. Re: [RTTY] Kenwood IF filters ??? (score: 1)
- Author: "B. Smith" <billn3xl@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 06:40:47 -0800 (PST)
- So, if I am interpreting this correctly, proper spacing between stations is 300HZ. I.E we should move away from a contact 300 HZ before calling CQ, in order not to interfere. ... or 250HZ, assuming o
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00211.html (15,844 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu