W4UK. I need to fix a bug. Thanks for the test. Terry I have a demo app running on 14.098 with a power of 50 watts and antennas pointed NE and NW. If someone has time can they run a test? Here is the
Hi folks, Here is a comment that I just filled with the FCC that plots current 40 meter interference from automated packet and estimates future interference that will happen if RM-11708 is approved.
Please everyone. It's very important that CW, RTTY and even SSB users submit a comment AGAINST RM-11708 today. We a told that the FCC will probably close comments on Monday. You do not have to be tec
Thanks to everyone who has filed. There are still a few more hours left. The instructions are listed below. I made one more filing that can be seen at: http://64.128.19.154/WinlinkLegality.pdf So ple
Folks, Jeff, WK6I and I have been swapping emails about collecting better evidence on interference from unattended digital stations. The idea is that everyone could keep a simple log of any interfere
Can the Winlink sysop activate the station? Example: a RTTY contester wonders on what a Winlink operator considers to be "his frequency". The Winlink operator starts a 15 minute transfer of dummy dat
I downloaded the WINMORE app and taking a quick look at it. WINMORE TNC is a standalone app and you communicate with it using TCPIP. It requires a registration key but I think that's optional (not su
There were 89 comments filed with the FCC this weekend and almost all were AGAINST RM-11708. Outstanding! Terry AB5K _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.
I found that the AR15 guys are doing some Winmor/P2P work off the Winlink grid. See: http://www.ar15.com/archive/topic.html?b=10 <http://www.ar15.com/archive/topic.html?b=10&f=22&t=665066> &f=22&t=66
Sorry I messed up the link its: http://www.ar15.com/archive/topic.html?b=10&f=22&t=665066 I found that the AR15 guys are doing some Winmor/P2P work off the Winlink grid. See: http://www.ar15.com/arch
Hi Ron, Very interesting. I love the part where he states: "WinLink 2000 ... combination of free software and inexpensive equipment added to your existing Amateur Radio station will allow you to send
Some history of automated station rulings that may be of help: 1986 - FCC granted automatic control of amateur stations operating on VHF and UHF 1995 - Based on the ARRL's recommendations: ARRL RM-82
The July, 2004 ARRL Board minutes ties the ARRL and Winlink together. The ARRL is on record encouraging the deployment of Winlink. Also the ARRL had oversight with opportunities for correction of Win
I certainly agree in the major breach of trust. The ARRL is on record supporting Winlink which has no transparency, pseudo encryption, is causing interference to other CW/Data spectrum users and is m
I'm not sure what is the best approach. There is a definite bias that starts on the director level as demonstrated below. It appears that the board has been stacked with directors who favor EMCOM and
Here is the ARRL board minutes that started RM-11708. It's interesting to note that in the minutes there was a motion to NOT have any bandwidth limit that was defeated and the version that had the 2.
Joe, Looks like there were also issues in 2006: In November 2006, N5RFX filed RM-11392: <http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=6519008574> RM11392 asks the FCC to re-establish the narrowband natu
We need to get one to Dan, W5DNT. He wants to wear it at the ARRL Donor dinner which is also on Thursday night. Adding Dan to the thread... Thanks Terry AB5K Many thanks to Steve, NR4M for the RM-117
CTDXCC, RTTY reflector and DFW Contesters, Many of us know Ted, N9NB, and his contributions to amateur and the engineering world. For those who may now know Ted, here is a link to a page on the ARRL
Hi Dan, Thanks for your inputs. First, the 300 baud symbol rate that the ARRL is asking to be removed is something that protects us. The ARRL is looking at this from the side of WinLink which is simp