Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ab5k@hotmail.com: 74 ]

Total 74 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee - Current thoughts and status (score: 1)
Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 18:42:01 -0500
And ID in CW, especially if they use a undocumented code. --Original Message-- From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Joe Subich, W4TV Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 5:44 PM To: r
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00179.html (10,214 bytes)

22. Re: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee - Current thoughts and status (score: 1)
Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 19:05:00 -0500
The wording that I saw was: "A RTTY, data or multiplexed emission using an unspecified digital code under the limitations listed in§ 97.309(b) of this part also may be transmitted." I assume that was
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00182.html (12,189 bytes)

23. Re: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee - Current thoughts and status (score: 1)
Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 20:34:55 -0500
Hi Michael, Great point. I found a WinLink video on u-Tube where a ham is taking three LOTW Q's and uploading them to the ARRL. I'm not even sure which technology mode he is using but it gives a good
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00195.html (13,597 bytes)

24. [RTTY] Pactor 3 demo (score: 1)
Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 10:27:48 -0500
Yesterday a few of us witnessed a demonstration of Winlink using the PACTOR 3 waveform. A simple one line email was sent from a EOC center in North Texas to one of the Winlink stations in Central Tex
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00207.html (6,976 bytes)

25. Re: [RTTY] Pactor 3 demo (score: 1)
Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:42:24 -0500
Jim, I would never deliberately cause interference to anyone. I was told that the EOC had planned to initiate a test message at that time and a few of us listened in as we are curious about the techn
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00210.html (9,583 bytes)

26. [RTTY] Fwd: Regarding RM-11708 -=-= this is really bad! (score: 1)
Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 17:08:44 -0500
For folks involved in RM-11708, here is a interesting email thread from the Central Texas DX and Contest Club that contains thoughts from the CW side of things. It's encouraging to see that other key
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00250.html (33,461 bytes)

27. Re: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee - Current thoughts and status (score: 1)
Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 17:16:27 -0500
Hi Mark and all, We assembled a good committee of well qualified folks. There are several key points that were agreed on but when it came down to a actual band plan that's just tough to do over email
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00313.html (15,858 bytes)

28. [RTTY] Band Plan Points (score: 1)
Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 17:32:40 -0500
Here are some general thoughts and concerns that can be used in preparing your own response to the ARRL band plan committee. Please copy your directors with your inputs. Unattended Digital Stations n
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00314.html (12,960 bytes)

29. Re: [RTTY] Band Plan Points (score: 1)
Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 20:12:51 -0500
Hi Dave, I got back on the air late last year after a 5 year period of station building. The major change that I noticed was that no matter where I operated (except for 10 meters) , I was QRMed by un
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00323.html (15,380 bytes)

30. Re: [RTTY] I was wrong (score: 1)
Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 20:24:52 -0500
I forwarded your message to my Vice Director (and FYI, its already been discussed around here). Hopefully the Roanoke, folks can send their representatives a gentle reminder as well. The ROANOKE and
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00324.html (8,556 bytes)

31. Re: [RTTY] Band Plan Points (score: 1)
Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 20:43:13 -0500
The ARRL's definition of a band plan is " A band plan refers to a voluntary division of a band to avoid interference between incompatible modes.". (ref: http://www.arrl.org/band-plan). I believe the
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00326.html (9,826 bytes)

32. Re: [RTTY] What is this auto mode that QRM's me? (score: 1)
Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 12:14:43 -0500
Here is a list of 80 meter Winlink frequencies: VE1YZ 3,565.000 KHz Pactor 1,2,3,4 VE1YZ 3,565.000 KHz WINMOR 1600 WG3G 3,569.000 KHz Pactor 1,2,3 CIW930 3,571.500 KHz Pactor 1,2,3,4 VE7SCC 3,571.500
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00339.html (13,820 bytes)

33. [RTTY] Another thought (score: 1)
Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 15:36:19 -0500
How about setting up a SDR to record a few key bands (80, 40 and 20) on the next major RTTY contest? Anyone experiencing interference could document the frequency and time and later the recording cou
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00344.html (6,539 bytes)

34. [RTTY] MINUTES OF ARRL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (score: 1)
Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:31:19 -0500
The EC minute details are listed below and RM-11708 is discussed in section 4.2.4 Terry AB5K 4.2.4. Comments on the ARRL?s petition, RM-11708, continue to be received by the FCC past the deadline, mo
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00092.html (20,995 bytes)

35. [RTTY] ARRL Dayton Donor Recognition Reception Dinner (score: 1)
Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:04:06 -0500
The ARRL has their Donor Recognition Reception Dinner at the Dayton Country Club on Thursday, the same night as the RTTY Dinner. Press release from the 2013 ARRL Donor Reception below. If we could ge
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00101.html (7,687 bytes)

36. [RTTY] Please file your comments with RM-11708 with teh FCC and your ARRL Director (score: 1)
Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:40:32 -0500
Folks, It's still not too late to file comments regarding RM-11708. Also please copy your directors on your comments. If anyone needs help in the filing, please let me know as I have helped a couple
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00120.html (12,655 bytes)

37. Re: [RTTY] New proposal for a Automated Digital Contest (score: 1)
Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 14:11:35 -0500
One option would be to adopt a "mean spirited" approach like Winlink that says busy frequency detectors are NOT needed. However, MMTTY has FFT data available via its API (the data that drives the wat
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00273.html (12,110 bytes)

38. Re: [RTTY] New proposal for a Automated Digital Contest (score: 1)
Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 14:35:23 -0500
Hi Ron, Since everyone already has MMTTY or 2-tone already setup, I believe that would be the preferred choice if a busy frequency detector can be implemented. There are all kind of interesting thing
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00274.html (10,241 bytes)

39. Re: [RTTY] New proposal for a Automated Digital Contest (score: 1)
Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 16:11:12 -0500
Hi Chen, That's great technical info. These kinds of inputs are great as they cause us to think along other lines. For example, one idea might be to do a 2Tone/MMTTY shootout where every QSO is make
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00275.html (11,169 bytes)

40. [RTTY] Demo app (score: 1)
Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 17:56:06 -0500
I have a demo app running on 14.098 with a power of 50 watts and antennas pointed NE and NW. If someone has time can they run a test? Here is the expected usability and make sure the spaces are in th
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00277.html (6,696 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu