Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:aa6yq@ambersoft.com: 201 ]

Total 201 documents matching your query.

21. RE: [RTTY] updating QSL-status from LOTW-report (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:42:51 -0500
DXKeeper, a free logging application, correctly synchronizes with LotW -- it independently tracks the confirmation of each QSO via paper, eQSL.cc, and LotW, and automatically updates its status based
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00135.html (8,956 bytes)

22. RE: [RTTY] Turtle Beach Santa Cruz problem? (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:50:25 -0500
Sounds more like a driver problem -- you might try re-downloading a new one from the Turtle Beach web site. 73, Dave, AA6YQ Hi, After reading the archive here I decided to install a Turtle Beach Sant
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00157.html (8,550 bytes)

23. RE: [RTTY] PSN Modulation & PSK31 with Icom (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 21:28:25 -0500
I was in a similar situation last December with Europa. TO4E's strategy for handling the pileups on PSK was to randomly jump around the band with short CQs. I found broadband decoding -- the capabili
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00174.html (9,850 bytes)

24. RE: [RTTY] Re: PSK31 -vs- PACTOR II/III (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:31:06 -0500
The attraction of soundcard-based implementations is not simply reduced expense, its also increased functionality: - panoramic tuning via a waterfall or spectrum display - the ability to decode multi
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00247.html (8,293 bytes)

25. RE: [RTTY] Re: PSK31 -vs- PACTOR II/III (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:49:37 -0500
There is an error-free protocol hosted on a PC and soundcard; see http://www.eham.net/articles/9785 . Even better, they are working on "busy detectors" for other modes so that when used in semi-autom
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00251.html (8,676 bytes)

26. RE: [RTTY] FIle conversion (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 00:02:04 -0500
http://www.qsl.net/dxkeeper/conversion.htm describes a collection of log conversion utilities, at least one of which claims to convert WF1B logs. 73, Dave, AA6YQ I need to convert some older WF1B log
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00355.html (7,114 bytes)

27. Re: [RTTY] [MMTTY] NA QSO PARTY - LotW finally! (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:53:56 -0500
You can import your MMTTY log into DXKeeper, which can upload QSOs directly to LotW. To avoid the import step, you can use WinWarbler for RTTY; it utilizes the MMTTY engine, and logs QSOs directly in
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00518.html (8,688 bytes)

28. [RTTY] FW: Pactor, Winlink,and semi-automatic operation on the HF bands: a straightforwardresolution (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:48:19 -0700
An unfortunate side-effect of the ARRL's proposed shift to "regulation by bandwidth" is that semi-automatic operation would no longer be restricted to specific sub-bands, as it is today; such operati
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-04/msg00061.html (9,856 bytes)

29. Re: [RTTY] Wow! check out this USB to Serial adapter (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 16:12:28 -0400
The VSCOM 8-port adaptor uses an FTDI chipset, which based on your information below means it would not support direct FSK keying. Support for EXTFSK with the MMTTY engine will be available in the re
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00084.html (12,071 bytes)

30. Re: [RTTY] Our turn at a poll (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 16:38:42 -0500
When tuning RTTY signals, I use a. (method) (example) [ ] Scope (MMTTY software type) [ ] Scope (a real scope) [X] FFT display (a la MMTTY) [ ] LED bar graph (PK-232) [ ] LED x-y display (HAL DXP-38)
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00249.html (8,580 bytes)

31. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal - FCC Invites Comments (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:44:10 -0500
Applied to stations with a local control operator, George, that's correct. However 97.221 permits a form of QSO where one of the stations is automatically controlled, and is responding to interrogati
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00313.html (11,227 bytes)

32. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal - FCC Invites Comments (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 19:40:38 -0500
I don't recall Pactor's reputation being tarnished by poor AEA and MFJ implementations. But if AEA's and MFJ's implementations were in fact sub-standard, then they were doing SCS a favor by expanding
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00374.html (13,964 bytes)

33. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth proposal (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:09:23 -0500
There is a difference this time around: the internet. Debate over the pro's and con's of the ARRL's proposal have raged far and wide across mailing lists and reflectors, engaging ARRL and non-ARRL me
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00411.html (8,733 bytes)

34. Re: [RTTY] - "Freely available software" (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:11:00 -0500
And stay away from the propagation beacons! 73, Dave, AA6YQ too narrow a debate subject, make it S02R running 23 HZ RTTY signing /QRP with Dashes in the report, finding Magnetic North, and Owls on th
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00425.html (10,190 bytes)

35. Re: [RTTY] ARRL To QSY To 1807.500 KC (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 00:57:08 -0500
The absence of "and we checked the bandplan" from the process you describe below is both glaring and ominous. Conformance to voluntary bandplans is the foundation of the ARRL's claim (in RM-11306) th
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00026.html (13,610 bytes)

36. Re: [RTTY] possible tip for you vu4/rtty hunters (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 00:25:44 -0400
I worked VU4AN/VU3NZB on 18,100 at 1737Z on 4/19m from just west of Boston, MA. I used WinWarbler, with both the MMTTY engine and a KAM 98 running in parallel. The MMTTY engine profile was set to "hy
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-04/msg00125.html (9,740 bytes)

37. Re: [RTTY] possible tip for you vu4/rtty hunters (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 01:14:46 -0400
QSOs on 30m count towards the ARRL's DXCC and Challenge awards, and towards the TopList awards. 73, Dave, AA6YQ Congrats Dave. I saw spots where they were working 30 meters. Why do DX'peditions bothe
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-04/msg00129.html (8,349 bytes)

38. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: [digitalradio] RTTY Hall of Shame (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:14:56 -0400
I often check the IARU beacons on 14100 -- comparing actual signal levels with forecast signal levels is a good way to calibrate propagation forecasts. There are quite a few applications available fo
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00153.html (9,521 bytes)

39. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Hall of Shame (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:30:31 -0400
There are 16 beacons on this frequency, spread around the world. Each transmits in turn for 10 seconds out of 180, and then the process repeats. Depending on propagation, your antenna's gain and head
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00155.html (9,493 bytes)

40. Re: [RTTY] LOTW DCXCC - WHO HAS WHAT? (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 18:29:10 -0400
I have 89 countries confirmed on RTTY via LotW. 73, Dave, AA6YQ Hello Group, Wondering who has DXCC RTTY completed via LOTW ONLY? If not, then how many countries you have CFM via Lotw? I work RTTY fo
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-03/msg00128.html (8,592 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu