Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:aa6yq@ambersoft.com: 201 ]

Total 201 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [RTTY] 7O6T (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 19:10:36 -0400
Starts RTTY on 20 around 1700 Z and works EU. Just as he builds here in Michigan, he quits around 2100 Z. After he went QRT, I went to 17 and worked 6O0CW on the first call. It's going to be tough t
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00063.html (7,701 bytes)

122. Re: [RTTY] ?? 7O6T (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 20:05:36 -0400
The persistent snubbing of NA on RTTY is getting tiresome, especially with few days of the operation left. Maybe the NA response should be for the DXCC Desk to refuse to accredit the operation on th
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00068.html (9,915 bytes)

123. Re: [RTTY] ?? 7O6T (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 20:14:43 -0400
Mike, Consider the statistics. Total Qs = 120218 RTTY Qs = 2253 (1.9%) EU RTTY Qs = 1893 (84%) NA RTTY Qs = 88 (3.9%) Obviously, these guys didn't plan on being a presence on RTTY. Obviously, these
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00070.html (9,184 bytes)

124. Re: [RTTY] ?? 7O6T (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 20:46:13 -0400
Dave, I haven't chased them on RTTY because while I can print them, they work only EU. For the record, my DXCC RTTY total is 313, so I'm pretty sure they could hear me if they were working NA betwee
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00077.html (9,575 bytes)

125. Re: [RTTY] ?? 7O6T (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 21:09:07 -0400
Dave, Second, by 0600 UTC , it's 1:00 a.m. in the morning in Iowa, and 20 meters isn't open. plenty of Midwest stations working 7O6T on 20m between 2Z and 4Z; it's hard not to remember getting beat
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00080.html (9,941 bytes)

126. Re: [RTTY] ?? 7O6T (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 21:19:10 -0400
Correction, the PropView forecast in <www.dxlabsuite.com/propview/KU0A-7O6T.jpg> shows the 20m opening between your QTH to 7O6T to be "3z to 6z", as stated in earlier posts in this thread. 73, Dave,
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00082.html (10,846 bytes)

127. Re: [RTTY] 7O6T (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 12:53:36 -0400
They seem to be missing one of the prime spots on 20m at least for the western USA. That is 0200-0600. We consistently hear stations from that part of the world in that time period. Maybe the ops do
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00096.html (8,120 bytes)

128. Re: [RTTY] 7O6T on RTTY: NA now! (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 19:28:21 -0400
7O6R is on 20m RTTY now calling for NA stations; I've seen QSOs with east coast and midwestern stations. 73, Dave, AA6YQ _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contest
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00099.html (7,633 bytes)

129. Re: [RTTY] Need a better strategy (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 01:32:26 -0400
You know, that's not a bad idea.  The DX calls CQ on one frequency, 14080, but says he will answer you on your frequency (but NOT this one). He would hop around working stations on their frequency s
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00124.html (8,293 bytes)

130. Re: [RTTY] 18.110 (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 19:54:39 -0400
Beyond keeping your emission products between 18.068 and 18.168, I'm not sure the FCC cares. RTTY at 18.112, or 18.150 for that matter, is still within the 17m band. It just doesn't adhere to the AR
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00199.html (8,118 bytes)

131. Re: [RTTY] 18.110 (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 21:37:44 -0400
"They announce QRX for 5min and the pile still calls...." What I hate is when the DX comes back to a station and clearly has the other station's callsign, but others continue to call. I understand t
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00204.html (11,115 bytes)

132. Re: [RTTY] mode allocations (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 01:01:36 -0400
That is a good question. The good ole USA has more restrictions on their operation than any other country. Why? Probably because of all the bureaucracy of the Federal Government and if we don't writ
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00211.html (7,856 bytes)

133. Re: [RTTY] mode allocations (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 18:44:39 -0400
I am unclear how your comments apply to why the USA has far more restrictive rules. Bad apples don't care about the rules or laws. FCC regulation that precludes operators in that pileup from flockin
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-05/msg00222.html (8,766 bytes)

134. Re: [RTTY] WPX on LoTW (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 12:48:54 -0400
The ARRL is evidently adding WPX support incrementally to the "live" LotW site, rather than implementing and testing in a staging area not accessible to the general community. There's no harm in look
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-07/msg00012.html (7,944 bytes)

135. Re: [RTTY] Software question (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 20:28:37 -0700
--Original Message-- From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Kok Chen Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 12:41 PM To: RTTY Reflector Cc: Bill, W6WRT Subject:
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-07/msg00110.html (8,906 bytes)

136. Re: [RTTY] Software question (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 22:52:47 -0700
+++ more AA6YQ comment sbelow matter of course. suspect that's also true of N1MM. REPLY: That raises a couple of questions. 1. If you were starting DXLab now, making it platform-independent, could yo
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-07/msg00114.html (9,628 bytes)

137. Re: [RTTY] AA6YQ FIR512 Parameters (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 23:42:14 -0400
I wonder did anyone use the new release of the AA6YQ FIR512 USERPARA? changed since I made it available in 2010. is equivalent to using the AA6YQ-FIR-512 profile 73, Dave, AA6YQ ____________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-09/msg00193.html (7,158 bytes)

138. Re: [RTTY] AA6YQ FIR512 Parameters (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 17:25:38 -0400
REPLY: When Dave first came out with his profile, several people including me commented that it did not work well when several stations were on the same frequency. Dave soon verified that was the ca
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00031.html (8,472 bytes)

139. Re: [RTTY] 2Tone from logger32.net (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:17:51 -0500
2Tone's integration with DXLab provides simultaneous RTTY decoding alongside the MMTTY engine and an external RTTY modem (KAM, PK232), and is being tested by several ops. It will be publicly released
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00381.html (9,638 bytes)

140. Re: [RTTY] 2Tone from logger32.net (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:38:01 -0500
Does it work with real Terminal Units ? ST-8000, DXP38, ST-6000 ? <http://www.eham.net/articles/8616> 73, Dave, AA6YQ On 2/18/2013 3:17 PM, Dave AA6YQ wrote: ________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00384.html (11,279 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
This search system is powered by Namazu