Mail Archive Search: <+from:a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>

Results:

References: [ +from:a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] RTTY in 7.1 to 7.2 (score: 1): Author: "Andy swiffin" <a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>; Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 12:01:41 +0000; Hi, This is my first post to this list. I've been using rtty, mainly in contests, for nearly a year. On the eve of waedc rtty last year I downloaded mmtty, just to see what it was all about!! 300 qso; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00009.html (7,568 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] 17" flat panel prices (score: 1): Author: "Andy swiffin" <a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>; Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 09:09:11 +0000; The good news is that you (nearly) can. I've just bought one from Aria, www.aria.co.uk have significantly cheaper 15 and 17 inch lcd monitors than I've seen other UK retailers offering. Check out th; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00043.html (8,299 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] WAEDC + QTC's and how to handle them (score: 1): Author: "Andy swiffin" <a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 08:16:56 +0000; sender and otherwise QTC's... too Yes it surely has to be like this. If the recipient of the QTCs has sent in a log that doesn't include the QTCs then I would expect the senders QTCs to be dumped fr; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00078.html (9,132 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] fixed the MARK has 2125 Hz in MMRRTY 1.65? (score: 1): Author: "Andy swiffin" <a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:50:59 +0000; has 2125 Hz in MMRRTY 1.65? difficult with this problem at the time of a CQ WW RTTY for example or there are really Hi David, Hope to catch you over the weekend in the contest! You can fix the Mark; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00082.html (7,333 bytes)
5. [RTTY] WAE Rtty (score: 1): Author: "Andy swiffin" <a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 11:19:23 +0000; Hi, Do we get a rebate on our licence fees when conditions are that bad? WAE Rtty fell, unfortunately, after a week of very nice visual auroras here in GM. I expected high HF to be a 'bit surpressed'; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00093.html (7,575 bytes)
6. [RTTY] wae rtty (again) (score: 1): Author: "Andy swiffin" <a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 13:58:00 +0000; Hi, I forgot to say, All credit to you folks in DL-land, a great turnout for the contest, over a quarter of all qsos in my WAE RTTY log were with DL stations. Great support. BTW, in the UK there's be; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00096.html (6,907 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] rfi? (score: 1): Author: "Andy swiffin" <a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:32:08 +0000; Assuming of course that you have a rig that does FSK directly? One additional suggestion I would make with AFSK is beware that the first Mic audio input stage can be before the gain control. I had t; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00101.html (8,197 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] CW/RTTY QRM Saturday evening (score: 1): Author: "Andy swiffin" <a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>; Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:03:03 +0000; The Band plan here gives us digital down to 7035 and you will certainly be finding many EU stations down to there. 73 Andy GM8OEG _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RT; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00074.html (7,264 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] PSK Info (score: 1): Author: "Andy swiffin" <a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:12:02 +0000; and the But the mode is surprisingly efficient. I decided to spend a bit more time with PSK one Sunday evening towards the end of last year. And was really surprised to work a PZ and 3 COs straight; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00204.html (7,675 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] Green Keys vs. PSK31 - One man's opinion (score: 1): Author: "Andy swiffin" <a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>; Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:13:22 +0000; into And don't forget to have a macro which has your age, when you were first licenced, your shoes size...... crossover RTTY. N1MM contest logger has a 4 channel PSK engine built in. Not the same as; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00243.html (8,233 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] Contest Happenings?? (score: 1): Author: "Andy swiffin" <a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:16:07 +0000; TU, is I would say that none of that stations qsos were valid without an ACK. There are various definitions around about what constitutes a qso but I always tend to gravitate back to my VHF meteor s; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00297.html (9,467 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] Contest Happenings - Comments! (score: 1): Author: "Andy swiffin" <a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>; Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:26:40 +0000; I prefer the exchange three times, the same is true for calls calling me when I'm running. Why? Because if there's iffy conditions, a bit of fading and a bit of multipath if you only have two and th; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00357.html (8,497 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] Contest Happenings - Comments! (score: 1): Author: "Andy swiffin" <a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>; Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:30:15 +0000; It might be dead but it comes back to haunt my monitor EVERY contest..... Andy gm8oeg _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00358.html (7,731 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] AFSK Splatter (score: 1): Author: "Andy swiffin" <a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>; Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:11:58 +0100; There is one area where clipping occurs which caught me out, and I didn't spot it as a problem until I started using PSK. This is in the audio stage _before_ the mic gain. I had been using rtty afsk; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00291.html (7,942 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] DF0DX first winner of the awaited "F6IRF dummy-award" ! (score: 1): Author: "Andy swiffin" <a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>; Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 13:28:23 +0000; not humor... Indeed, we've all made such mistakes and also the mistake of going back to what you thought was someones CQ only to find them in mid QSO. Although I did think the the DL stations very v; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-11/msg00128.html (8,508 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] How about this! (score: 1): Author: "Andy swiffin" <a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>; Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 13:41:08 +0000; Maybe every contest rules should have a sample of a "model exchange"? I'd like to repeat my plea for people to send serials 3 times. OK I know some very respected (and rightly) stations say send it; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-11/msg00129.html (7,971 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] How about this! (score: 1): Author: "Andy swiffin" <a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>; Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 14:58:11 +0000; Thanks Wolf, its really nice to know I was getting out OK. I only have a small station - 80 Watts and a low dipole on 40/15 and 20 and an inverted L (actually more like an end fed V!) on 80. to vers; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-11/msg00135.html (8,802 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] CW interference! (score: 1): Author: "Andy swiffin" <a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>; Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:26:53 +0000; LOL! And the strange thing is, I'm beginning to agree with you... feel Me too. Even though I did have some guy haranguing me about being there because I would cause QRM to 3Y0X should they come on r; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00270.html (7,914 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Move To 1807.500 KC (score: 1): Author: "Andy swiffin" <a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:47:51 +0000; operation kc I wondered why I never heard any digital from the US. Has nobody ever told you that the UK (and quite a few other europeans) can't operate below 1810? IARU region one bandplan puts digi; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00389.html (8,073 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on 160 Meters (score: 1): Author: "Andy swiffin" <a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>; Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:19:27 +0000; 28/02/2006 04:07:25: an Jings - you guys miss the point quickly!! If you go on to 1808 we can't come out to play. We aren't allowed below 1810. Our IARU bandplan puts digital 1838 to 1842 where we c; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00428.html (8,221 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]