Mail Archive Search: <+from:W4LA@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:W4LA@aol.com: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 97, Issue 5 (score: 1): Author: W4LA@aol.com; Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 17:58:14 -0500 (EST); I love it Chen!! Very good point. I will ALWAYS use DE. Having been a ham for over 50 years, I can't see why change now. It has never been nor will it ever be too confusing to me and BTW, I am not a; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00080.html (9,136 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Funny signal (score: 1): Author: W4LA@aol.com; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:14:36 -0500 (EST); That's why I use the "monitor" button to check. Or a second radio! Todd / W4LA I didn't see that one but I had many stations calling me with no shift, just a steady mark tone. Normally I'll see this; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00286.html (8,708 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] My Macro Opinion (score: 1): Author: W4LA@aol.com; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:20:17 -0500 (EST); I think all you guys are thinking backwards. You spend too much time criticizing other folks' contest macros and responses. I was very careful to create and use crisp, no wasted shifts macros. CQ RU; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00287.html (8,213 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Come on, Why bother? (score: 1): Author: W4LA@aol.com; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 14:55:46 -0500 (EST); Whoa.. A BIG "TMI" !! 73's, Todd / W4LA In a message dated 1/11/2011 1:37:59 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, alex@kr1st.com writes: TMI! :-) 73, --Alex KR1ST.com http://www.airlinkexpress.org Well, I do; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00337.html (8,443 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Why send 599 report (score: 1): Author: W4LA@aol.com; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:53:00 -0500 (EST); Bill, I agree with you. There has to be something exchanged, otherwise one could just copy calls and say they were contacts! There will always be those who want to harvest the crops without planting; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00437.html (8,573 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Why send 599 report (score: 1): Author: W4LA@aol.com; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:07:14 -0500 (EST); Good for you Glen. Me too! 73's, Todd / W4LA In a message dated 1/13/2011 4:41:41 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, va3dx@sympatico.ca writes: Same old stuff , over and over again. After every contest the; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00468.html (9,737 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] Digital DXCC or ARRL Board of Directors, respectfully: have my str... (score: 1): Author: W4LA@aol.com; Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 10:07:43 -0400 (EDT); There's no reason for publishing a annual DXCC book. This is the Internet age. It's just an added expense for the ARRL. I'm sure the money could be used better elsewhere. 73, Kermit, AB1J There aren'; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00078.html (7,925 bytes)
8. [RTTY] I think someone has missed the boat! (score: 1): Author: W4LA@aol.com; Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 11:14:12 -0500 (EST); I have been a ham a long time, and have participated in many contests. SSB, CW, and recently RTTY. With all the emails I have been receiving and reading, it seems that some have forgotten the word "A; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-01/msg00167.html (7,216 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]