- 1. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the ANTENNA OVERKILL horse... (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Lenaghan VE4LR" <VE4LR@arrl.net>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:59:31 -0500
- Greetings I'm new to the list and just walked in on this discussion. I run a KWM-2 with a not that high dipole and I often surprise myself by busting pileups. I dispatch for a living, endlessly yelli
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00211.html (12,035 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the SO2R horse (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Lenaghan VE4LR" <VE4LR@arrl.net>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 22:37:27 -0500
- Simple question, would MultiPSK Panoramic RTTY mode be SO2R? It does allow multiple reception all be it in the audio band pass. RYRY 73 Steve VE4LR _______________________________________________ RTT
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00232.html (6,715 bytes)
- 3. [RTTY] KWM-2 S-Line factory instruction sheet for RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Lenaghan VE4LR" <VE4LR@arrl.net>
- Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 13:55:38 -0500
- I came across an instruction sheet (Sept 64) on using a Collins on RTTY. I can make copies for a small price. In due course this will probably appear on the CCA manual page. 73 Steve VE4LR __________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00258.html (6,844 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] Be Careful What You Ask For ... (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Lenaghan VE4LR" <VE4LR@arrl.net>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 13:30:21 -0500
- Billy et al. I'm average Joe and one of a few RTTY stations in section MB. Last time I looked there were 3-4 logs submitted from here. Big Guns need the little guys for that extra section. Normal exc
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00284.html (9,450 bytes)
- 5. [RTTY] Level Playing Field is unrealistic (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Lenaghan VE4LR" <VE4LR@arrl.net>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 13:59:34 -0500
- The entire concept of 'levelling the playing field' is unrealistic. It makes about as much sense as my High School football team making it to Superbowl or Grey Cup based on some form of equalization
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00286.html (7,410 bytes)
- 6. Re: [RTTY] Level Playing Field is unrealistic (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Lenaghan VE4LR" <VE4LR@arrl.net>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:00:15 -0500
- Jim Not really. My point is that adjusting the rules to favour the lesser player is creating a handicap system which may work fine in golf but not here. By forcing a second classification that some o
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00299.html (10,208 bytes)
- 7. Re: [RTTY] Level Playing Field is unrealistic (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Lenaghan VE4LR" <VE4LR@arrl.net>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 22:28:07 -0500
- Ahh, this brings us to 'whose' playing field are we levelling here? Steve VE4LR --Original Message-- From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Bill Turner Sen
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00336.html (8,952 bytes)
- 8. [RTTY] constant bickering (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Lenaghan VE4LR" <VE4LR@arrl.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 07:25:50 -0500
- Gentlemen The bandwidth devoted to this constant bickering is excessive. I joined this list in order to find some wisdom but any attempts have been buried in clamour to make their point, over and ove
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00351.html (8,470 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu