Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:KeepWalking188@ac0c.com: 156 ]

Total 156 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Deliberate Interference (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 22:39:04 +0900
Thomas, I think you are right. History has it's own momentum and that's working to the benefit of the W1AW operations. And while it may very well be an issue warranting reconsideration, despite the y
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00107.html (10,015 bytes)

22. Re: [RTTY] Contest CQ-detection by the RTTY-Skimmer system (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 11:34:08 -0500
The QRZ may be like a CQ, but it is not the generally used syntax of the RTTY contest community. CQ is, unfortunately for the RTTY skimmer need... 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00260.html (8,921 bytes)

23. Re: [RTTY] Contest CQ-detection by the RTTY-Skimmer system (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 18:10:55 -0500
Yea, that's great! This TU CALL CQ is the common closure. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie --Original Message-- From: Jeff Stai Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2014 12:48 PM To: Walter D
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00266.html (9,722 bytes)

24. Re: [RTTY] 2Tone updated (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 11:14:03 -0500
Thanks for your continued work on this project David! 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie This is available here: https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/N1MMLogger-Digital/files/G3YYD/
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-07/msg00030.html (8,058 bytes)

25. Re: [RTTY] Getting ready for NAQP RTTY problem (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 22:19:46 -0500
Ron, You would do well to Hank's suggestions. RTTY contesting has a focus on efficiency and the best results are obtained by using the exchanges and formats that are the standards in the RTTY contest
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-07/msg00035.html (8,903 bytes)

26. Re: [RTTY] The RTTY efficiency myth (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 10:53:52 -0500
It's great this guy asked. That shows a respect for the traditions and that he's interested in "doing it right." Good for him. There are plenty of activities in life where individual expression benef
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-07/msg00041.html (10,112 bytes)

27. Re: [RTTY] The RTTY efficiency myth (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 11:14:52 -0500
Oops. Fired that off before proper coffee administration. CORRECTED below... -- It's great this guy asked. That shows a respect for the traditions and that he's interested in "doing it right." Good f
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-07/msg00042.html (10,633 bytes)

28. Re: [RTTY] The RTTY efficiency myth and SUPERFILL (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 17:52:26 -0500
I'm confused; is someone advocating dropping the TU? Most guys use it. And from a S&P rate standpoint, it's very helpful for the run station to lead with that TU - as it let's the S&P caller know he'
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-07/msg00051.html (11,815 bytes)

29. Re: [RTTY] The RTTY efficiency myth and SUPERFILL (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 20:29:37 -0500
Bill, You are correct. That was my meaning but got in a rush to type the reply. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: Leading with the TU coul
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-07/msg00053.html (9,136 bytes)

30. [RTTY] cq ww rtty - off time for non-classic categories (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 14:05:17 -0500
I dont see an off-time restriction listed on the cqwwrtty.com site. Under classic overlay, there is a 60 minute minimum but the rules are silent otherwise. Does that mean there are no minimum off tim
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-09/msg00100.html (7,332 bytes)

31. Re: [RTTY] cq ww rtty - off time for non-classic categories (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 15:39:50 -0500
Jim, I'm reading that 60 minute limitation as applying ONLY to the guys claiming a classic overlay. I'm running So2r so I will fall into the generic SO category - no overlay. And from that, I conclud
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-09/msg00104.html (11,692 bytes)

32. Re: [RTTY] RTTY reversebeacon spotting network wow! (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:16:02 -0500
Making the software decode logic more intelligent is the better solution. The run format is a highly debated and sensitive subject. Space-CALL-space-CQ-space at the end the standard practice used by
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-09/msg00134.html (10,328 bytes)

33. Re: [RTTY] Rm-11708 update (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:21:38 -0500
Any updates on this? 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie From Arrl webpage (no executive committee minutes yet) In other matters, ARRL General Counsel Chris Imlay, W3KD, told the EC
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-10/msg00192.html (7,848 bytes)

34. [RTTY] W1AW/0 KANSAS RTT (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 10:55:15 -0600
We be running W1AW/0 over the next week and I will be hosting most of the RTTY. Today its 12m & 17m from 1800-2000. Starting on 12m and jumping to 17m depending on traffic. Approx freq: 24923 18105 I
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-11/msg00002.html (6,718 bytes)

35. Re: [RTTY] w1aw/0 (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 12:30:40 -0600
Thanks Jay for the catch. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie OUt of band on 24.935 UP...band stops at 24.930 _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@c
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-11/msg00005.html (6,860 bytes)

36. Re: [RTTY] W1AW/0 KANSAS RTT (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 14:51:17 -0600
Ron, I could not use the skimmer system this time and the Q rate was really miserable. I think if I could make this work right, the Q rate would be double. Of course, it would have helped that I star
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-11/msg00012.html (9,728 bytes)

37. Re: [RTTY] W1AW/0 KANSAS RTT (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 16:11:23 -0600
Phil, Once I can figure out how to marry up my skimmer config with N1MM, I will be running a lot of KS RTTY. No worries. I'll post here when I'm going to get on - and when I have this setup issue fig
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-11/msg00016.html (9,176 bytes)

38. [RTTY] KS W1AW/0 on RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 14:03:05 -0600
Ill run 10m today starting in a few minutes. I have MMVARI setup to do multiple decode over about a 1.5 Khz span. Its not ideal but it will be good for a much higher throughput. I could sustain well
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-11/msg00020.html (6,655 bytes)

39. Re: [RTTY] W1AW/0 [KS] (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 14:51:23 +0800
I will ask our state coordinator for how the rollup is coming along. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie No, I haven't received any yet for the recent (second) operation. Still pendi
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-11/msg00076.html (8,398 bytes)

40. Re: [RTTY] W1AW/0 Kansas?? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 23:27:36 -0600
K0RU told me it would be Jan approx before those are loaded. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie Joe, I have Kansas confirmed on 20 and 40 meters worked February 27th. Those are the
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-12/msg00039.html (8,908 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
This search system is powered by Namazu