Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+More\s+information\s+regarding\s+the\s+FCC\'s\s+TAC\s+inquiry\s+on\s+the\s+RF\s+spectrum\s+noise\s+floor\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] More information regarding the FCC's TAC inquiry on the RF spectrum noise floor (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 05:09:39 -0500
This story in Radio World does a good job of spelling out what it is all about: http://www.radioworld.com/article/fcc-adviors-tackle-noise-floor-issues/279077 73 Rob K5UJ ____________________________
/archives//html/RFI/2016-06/msg00051.html (6,944 bytes)

2. Re: [RFI] More information regarding the FCC's TAC inquiry on the RF spectrum noise floor (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 04:16:00 -0700
My assumption is the ARRL is all over this...  Ed?  If so, how can we help? -- 73's, and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) For software/hardware reviews see: http://www.nk7z.net ___________________________________
/archives//html/RFI/2016-06/msg00052.html (7,927 bytes)

3. Re: [RFI] More information regarding the FCC's TAC inquiry on the RF spectrum noise floor (score: 1)
Author: nm8rmedic via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 14:51:39 -0400
Until evidence is presented otherwise, I don't think we can assume the ARRL is 'all over this' FCC RFI inquiry.  I contacted the gentleman who was listed at the end of the document.  First, his ARRL
/archives//html/RFI/2016-06/msg00053.html (9,912 bytes)

4. Re: [RFI] More information regarding the FCC's TAC inquiry on the RF spectrum noise floor (score: 1)
Author: dalej <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 14:01:34 -0500
This will take a looooooooong time. Lots of talk and studies and in a few years maybe something will come of it, but more likely, nothing will come of it. I hope I'm wrong. Dale, k9vuj ______________
/archives//html/RFI/2016-06/msg00054.html (7,565 bytes)

5. Re: [RFI] More information regarding the FCC's TAC inquiry on the RF spectrum noise floor (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 13:17:00 -0700
I will continue to assume the ARRL is actively involved.  I can't imagine them missing this opportunity. -- 73's, and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) For software/hardware reviews see: http://www.nk7z.net ______
/archives//html/RFI/2016-06/msg00055.html (9,018 bytes)

6. Re: [RFI] More information regarding the FCC's TAC inquiry on the RF spectrum noise floor (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 18:14:27 -0500
I'm quite sure the FCC is hoping that the entire AM broadcast industry collapses before they have to do anything. I mean, these are the guys whose idea of "AM Revitalization" is to allow AM broadcast
/archives//html/RFI/2016-06/msg00056.html (8,624 bytes)

7. Re: [RFI] More information regarding the FCC's TAC inquiry on the RF spectrum noise floor (score: 1)
Author: nm8rmedic via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 21:08:09 -0400
And IBOC... Sent via the Samsung Galaxy NoteŽ II, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone <div>-- Original message --</div><div>From: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com> </div><div>Date:06/22/2016 7:14 PM (GMT-05:00) </
/archives//html/RFI/2016-06/msg00057.html (9,417 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu