Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+FW\:\s+TV\s+set\s+RFI\s+questions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+FW\:\s+TV\s+set\s+RFI\s+questions\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] FW: TV set RFI questions (score: 1): Author: EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com (EDWARDS, EDDIE J); Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 09:14:18 -0500; Below is an example of why RFI is such a problem for consumers. This is a response by Panasonic to my questions about TV RFI. Even TV manufacturer's don't seem to understand the problem, or at least; /archives//html/RFI/2000-07/msg00010.html (10,604 bytes)
2. [RFI] FW: TV set RFI questions (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com> (Pete Smith); Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 14:22:08 +0000; ARRL HQ used to maintain a list of engineering contacts at the various companies who were more knowledgeable than the 800-number crowd. You might try an e-mail to W1RFI@arrl.org. These days, an awful; /archives//html/RFI/2000-07/msg00011.html (8,012 bytes)
3. [RFI] FW: TV set RFI questions (score: 1): Author: Hare, Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org (Hare, Ed, W1RFI); Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 10:40:38 -0400; That list was actually maintained for a brief time by the Electronic Industries Association. It has long-since been discontinued by EIA (now the Consumer Electronics Association). In 1994, ARRL unde; /archives//html/RFI/2000-07/msg00012.html (11,598 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]