Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Experience\s+with\s+RF\-INQUIRY\s+Hi\-Q\s+Chokes\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Experience with RF-INQUIRY Hi-Q Chokes? (score: 1)
Author: Christian Buenger <c.buenger@gmx.ch>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 01:49:55 +0000
Hi rfi-experts, just came across an advertisement of a common-mode choke produced by RF-inquiry of Japan. They claim to provide at least 50 dB of reduction of common-mode-currents. There exists two v
/archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00000.html (7,264 bytes)

2. Re: [RFI] Experience with RF-INQUIRY Hi-Q Chokes? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 05:35:18 -0500
Sounds like a lot to me also. I can make receiving CM choke systems that are over 40dB at one frequency range, but I doubt anyone can do that over wide bandwidths without a pi-section and isolated g
/archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00001.html (8,751 bytes)

3. Re: [RFI] Experience with RF-INQUIRY Hi-Q Chokes? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 06:02:07 -0500
By the way, if the common mode source and load impedances are a fraction of an ohm it is easy to obtain -50dB. If the common mode source and load impedances (which have nothing much to do with line
/archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00002.html (7,349 bytes)

4. Re: [RFI] Experience with RF-INQUIRY Hi-Q Chokes? (score: 1)
Author: michael.findley@ni.com
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 07:50:41 -0600
Normally a 50 Ohm load is used. Refer to CISPR 16 ( A highly overpriced standard to which most all RF measurements are made.) "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting. To: <rfi@contesting.com>, "Christian Buenge
/archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00003.html (9,653 bytes)

5. Re: [RFI] Experience with RF-INQUIRY Hi-Q Chokes? (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:00:02 +0000
Tom Rauch wrote, in response to: just came across an advertisement of a common-mode choke produced by RF-inquiry of Japan. They claim to provide at least 50 dB of reduction of common-mode-currents. I
/archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00004.html (9,775 bytes)

6. Re: [RFI] Experience with RF-INQUIRY Hi-Q Chokes? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 09:33:07 -0500
of Standard schmandard. People can measure things like this any way they like. I use a 50 ohm network analyzer that has a 50 ohm source and load, but some CE tests or "do it yourself" tests use othe
/archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00005.html (9,517 bytes)

7. Re: [RFI] Experience with RF-INQUIRY Hi-Q Chokes? (score: 1)
Author: michael.findley@ni.com
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 08:42:31 -0600
What the hell, If you got the cash I got the stamp. "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting. To: "Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>, <rfi@contesting.com> com> cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: [RFI] Experience wi
/archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00006.html (11,007 bytes)

8. Re: [RFI] Experience with RF-INQUIRY Hi-Q Chokes? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jimbrown.enteract@rcn.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 10:00:20 -0600
Tom has hit this nail straight on the head (as usual). The problem is comparable to measuring the filtering characteristics of power line filters -- neither the standards for measurement nor the avai
/archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00007.html (9,261 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu