Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+DirecTV\s+to\s+ground\s+or\s+not\s+to\s+ground\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] DirecTV to ground or not to ground (score: 1)
Author: rick darwicki <n6pe@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:12:00 -0800 (PST)
My DTV antenna cable has an external ground wire that is broken off about 8 feet from the dish and not grounded to the converter box. Question, for TVI (not worried about lightning around here) shoul
/archives//html/RFI/2008-12/msg00056.html (6,720 bytes)

2. Re: [RFI] DirecTV to ground or not to ground (score: 1)
Author: Alan NV8A <nv8a@att.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:14:47 -0500
It is my understanding that the National Electric Code requires that your satellite dish be connected to the same ground as your power company's and telephone company's grounds and to your ham radio
/archives//html/RFI/2008-12/msg00057.html (7,061 bytes)

3. Re: [RFI] DirecTV to ground or not to ground (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:01:51 -0800
Yes. The NEC was written by very good engineers, and has included input from some with excellent background in audio, video, and RF. I haven't found anything in NEC that is in conflict with good engi
/archives//html/RFI/2008-12/msg00058.html (8,286 bytes)

4. Re: [RFI] DirecTV to ground or not to ground (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 13:46:42 -0500
Receive communications equipment and antenna grounding is covered in NEC Sec. 810. In fact, few licensed amateurs realize that the NEC has a sub-section devoted to amateur radio station operations/g
/archives//html/RFI/2008-12/msg00059.html (8,214 bytes)

5. Re: [RFI] DirecTV to ground or not to ground (score: 1)
Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:30:17 -0500
Paul, It looks as if the NEC is here concerned not with electrical characteristics, but with mechanical ones. Cortland KA5S Tx the NEC _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list
/archives//html/RFI/2008-12/msg00060.html (9,138 bytes)

6. Re: [RFI] DirecTV to ground or not to ground (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:41:27 -0500
It may be related to both mechanical and electrical safety concerns since the NEC (Sec. 810) dictates wire size irrespective of RF power level -- and that the specified gauges are adequate for maxim
/archives//html/RFI/2008-12/msg00061.html (7,674 bytes)

7. Re: [RFI] DirecTV to ground or not to ground (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:01:43 -0500
All of my antennas but one meet their criteria and that is a 75 meter dipole being fed the legal limit less coax loss. It's #16 copper clad steel and even with no more loss than 75' of LMR600 and 30'
/archives//html/RFI/2008-12/msg00062.html (8,772 bytes)

8. Re: [RFI] DirecTV to ground or not to ground (score: 1)
Author: "Jim P" <jvpoll@dallas.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 01:35:53 -0600
I'm going to relate this story, because, it underscores the need for a 'static-electricity drain path' to earth; the NEC may be seeking in their usual round-about way to provide this, albeit without
/archives//html/RFI/2008-12/msg00063.html (10,430 bytes)

9. Re: [RFI] DirecTV to ground or not to ground (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 01:31:04 -0800
Why are you beating up on NEC? It's a very good safety code. It is not a textbook. You want to learn how things work and why the code is written the way it is, you study a textbook. 73, Jim K9YC ____
/archives//html/RFI/2008-12/msg00064.html (8,288 bytes)

10. Re: [RFI] DirecTV to ground or not to ground (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:27:06 -0500
Cumulus in the area are not even necessary: Blowing dust, snow, rain and sometimes just wind can produce enough static charge to do this. I had a 1/4 wave vertical on 40 that was direct fed with coax
/archives//html/RFI/2008-12/msg00065.html (10,493 bytes)

11. Re: [RFI] DirecTV to ground or not to ground (score: 1)
Author: jvpoll@dallas.net
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 21:04:26 -0600
Just two points in response, Jim: a) I have endeavored to learn the reason why the NEC 'calls out' certain specific methods and have decidely not found the underlying rationale solely based in the 't
/archives//html/RFI/2008-12/msg00071.html (10,195 bytes)

12. Re: [RFI] DirecTV to ground or not to ground (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 21:10:56 -0800
One reference is the tutorial cited below. While it's written for sound and video contractors, the fundamentals apply to hams. http://audiosystemsgroup.com/SurgeXPowerGround.pdf It all comes down to
/archives//html/RFI/2008-12/msg00073.html (9,932 bytes)

13. Re: [RFI] DirecTV to ground or not to ground (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 01:21:24 -0500
Although it's usually phrased this way, it's pretty much impossible to have an entire building rise to the same potential at the same times due to the dV/dT (rise and fall) for lightning strikes, BUT
/archives//html/RFI/2008-12/msg00079.html (12,339 bytes)

14. Re: [RFI] DirecTV to ground or not to ground (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 23:50:24 -0800
Exactly right. All of those interconnections have inductance and resistance, lightning will be closer to one point in the building than others. In addition, there's voltage and current magnetically i
/archives//html/RFI/2008-12/msg00080.html (8,913 bytes)

15. Re: [RFI] DirecTV to ground or not to ground (score: 1)
Author: "Jim P" <jvpoll@dallas.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 21:03:42 -0600
Just two points in response, Jim: a) I have endeavored to learn the reason why the NEC 'calls out' certain specific methods and have decidely not found the underlying rationale solely based in the 't
/archives//html/RFI/2008-12/msg00096.html (10,313 bytes)

16. Re: [RFI] DirecTV to ground or not to ground (score: 1)
Author: "Jim P" <jvpoll@dallas.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:03:22 -0600
Jim, first of all, thank you for your response. You are a valuable asset on the list. I would also stress that there is one more reason for 'grounding' of equipment, esp. anything that has exposure t
/archives//html/RFI/2008-12/msg00101.html (13,278 bytes)

17. Re: [RFI] DirecTV to ground or not to ground (score: 1)
Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:51:13 -0500
Jim (and Jim!) Some years ago, when I was working in the telecom industry, I ascribed a number of puzzling protector failures to such slowly moving charges. Given the extent of telco outside plant, a
/archives//html/RFI/2008-12/msg00104.html (9,519 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu