Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Computer\s+RFI\s+problem\s*$/: 31 ]

Total 31 documents matching your query.

21. [RFI] Computer RFI problem (score: 1)
Author: ka5s@earthlink.net (Cortland Richmond)
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 15:12:14 -0700
Now, that IS interesting! Does NEC tell us that there isn't an end-null in an end-fed half-wave's's near field? Is the coupling purely capacitive to the adjacent feedline conductor? Cortland
/archives//html/RFI/2002-08/msg00021.html (9,533 bytes)

22. [RFI] Computer RFI problem (score: 1)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 23:54:40 +0100
When you drive 1 amp into Wire 1, NEC tells you how much current flows in Wire 2, but it doesn't tell you why or how. Not absolutely certain (it's getting late over here). -- 73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Pr
/archives//html/RFI/2002-08/msg00022.html (8,941 bytes)

23. [RFI] Computer RFI problem (score: 1)
Author: ka5s@earthlink.net (Cortland Richmond)
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 10:47:49 -0700
We can account for common-mode current here without recourse to induced fields. We must provide a relatively low impedance for the matching circuit return. There could be perhaps 20 volts on this ret
/archives//html/RFI/2002-08/msg00023.html (8,648 bytes)

24. [RFI] Computer RFI problem (score: 1)
Author: nwtncc@iswt.com (James C. Hall, M.D.)
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 12:48:32 -0500
Jim, I hope you haven't been up in the loft re-routing the coax! If not, Ian and Rob: I have been following this thread with great interest and no - haven't ventured into the rafters ... yet ;) Certa
/archives//html/RFI/2002-08/msg00024.html (9,637 bytes)

25. [RFI] Computer RFI problem (score: 1)
Author: n5tu@wt.net (Earl Morse)
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 22:09:30 -0500
Jamie, I am willing to bet that your RFI problem is a proximity issue. I have the same thing. A tribander 50 feet above the shack and the same tribander on a second tower located 100 feet away and 10
/archives//html/RFI/2002-08/msg00025.html (9,451 bytes)

26. [RFI] Computer RFI problem (score: 1)
Author: k4ro@k4ro.net (K4RO Kirk Pickering)
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 10:22:54 -0500
3. The Staples rebate center may lose your rebate, and require several weeks of telephone phone calls and emails to finally receive it. This happened to me. At one point, I think they were just waiti
/archives//html/RFI/2002-08/msg00026.html (9,233 bytes)

27. [RFI] Computer RFI problem (score: 1)
Author: k5uj@hotmail.com (Rob Atkinson, K5UJ)
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 17:25:37 +0000
I for one have been educated which is never a waste of time for me. I have had a similar odd problem in the form of qrn from AC power line noise. It's odd because at its worst, I rx it on 20-80, and
/archives//html/RFI/2002-08/msg00027.html (10,091 bytes)

28. [RFI] Computer RFI problem (score: 1)
Author: k5uj@hotmail.com (Rob Atkinson, K5UJ)
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 17:46:53 +0000
Hi Ian, Thank you for your investigation--no apology needed; I appreciate your comments as they have been a big help in my understanding. They were facinating, particularly the 20% increase with a do
/archives//html/RFI/2002-08/msg00028.html (12,379 bytes)

29. [RFI] Computer RFI problem (score: 1)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 22:25:45 +0100
Me too, so I've been forced to learn more about this subject than I'd ever wish to! - or else they blame the amp, and it shuttles back and forth uselessly to the manufacturer. Part of the difficulty
/archives//html/RFI/2002-08/msg00029.html (9,272 bytes)

30. [RFI] Computer RFI problem (score: 1)
Author: k5uj@hotmail.com (Rob Atkinson, K5UJ)
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 17:14:25 +0000
Yes that's correct, since at the exciter power level everything may seem fine; a tricky situation. I was lucky enough to work a friend not long after I got back on the air who told me I sounded as i
/archives//html/RFI/2002-08/msg00030.html (9,302 bytes)

31. [RFI] Computer RFI problem (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 12:19:59 -0400
This is unnecessary. The R7000 matching network already has a choke balun. Coiling coax or any other technique shouldn't be necessary. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not wi
/archives//html/RFI/2002-08/msg00043.html (7,959 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu