Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+BPL\s+Protest\s+Opportunity\?\s+\&\s+BC\-AM\s+Ant\s+Improvement\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RFI] BPL Protest Opportunity? & BC-AM Ant Improvement? (score: 1)
Author: doc kd4e <kd4e@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 08:04:33 -0400
CliffHazen@aol.com wrote: In a message dated 5/3/04 19:59:25 PM Pacific Daylight Time, W4EF@dellroy.com writes: I guess its safe to assume you won't be attending the protest, Berry :):) Mike, W4EF...
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00041.html (9,966 bytes)

2. Re: [RFI] BPL Protest Opportunity? & BC-AM Ant Improvement? (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 05:59:36 -0700
Does this mean you won't be attending the Bush BPL protest either, Doc? Mike, W4EF.................................... _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00042.html (10,021 bytes)

3. Re: [RFI] BPL Protest Opportunity? & BC-AM Ant Improvement? (score: 1)
Author: Ron Rossi <kk1l@intergate.com>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 09:05:44 -0400
To add to the noise I will not be attending the Bush protest either! -- 73 es God Bless de KK1L...ron (kk1l@arrl.net) <>< QTH: Jericho, Vermont My page: http://www.qsl.net/kk1l Michael Tope wrote: Wh
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00043.html (11,046 bytes)

4. Re: [RFI] BPL Protest Opportunity? & BC-AM Ant Improvement? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 09:27:34 -0400
Why don't we go back to talking about RFI, instead of trying to figure out which liar and crook is the most honorable and generous? Things will continue to deteriorate no matter who gets elected, be
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00044.html (9,398 bytes)

5. Re: [RFI] BPL Protest Opportunity? & BC-AM Ant Improvement? (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 02:37:22 -0700
I have always found factory radios (at least Fords) to have pretty good AM receivers. Most aftermarket car stereos seem to be absolutely awful, however. If your engine noise is radiated as opposed t
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00063.html (10,135 bytes)

6. Re: [RFI] BPL Protest Opportunity? & BC-AM Ant Improvement? (score: 1)
Author: <dgsvetan@rockwellcollins.com>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 09:34:08 -0500
Mike and Doc, I agree that factory radios are actually very good sets (possible exception being the very bottom end units). In 1999, I spent more than a month at a factory where auto radios were the
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00066.html (12,134 bytes)

7. Re: [RFI] BPL Protest Opportunity? & BC-AM Ant Improvement? (score: 1)
Author: "AA6DX" <aa6dx@pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 09:06:17 -0700
BEST car radio ever? From a junkyard 1956 Buick ... ran it in the house using a jumper in the vibrator socket, fed with filament xfmr circa 1965. LONG warrrrr aerial .. Had the speaker built in .. wh
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00069.html (13,378 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu