Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Arc\s+fault\s+protection\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Arc\s+fault\s+protection\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Arc fault protection (score: 1): Author: rick darwicki <n6pe@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 09:40:41 -0800 (PST); I remember when these first came out, building codes required them on the duplex outlet circuits to bedrooms so electric blankets didn't cause fires. Now a lot of states want them everywhere. Typical; /archives//html/RFI/2013-01/msg00046.html (6,989 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] Arc fault protection (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 10:15:19 -0800; Two important clarifications here. First, virtually all building codes in North America are based on NEC, which is written by a group of EEs from industry. It's a very good code. NEC is adopted by lo; /archives//html/RFI/2013-01/msg00047.html (8,278 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] Arc fault protection (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 16:35:26 -0500; On 1/5/2013 12:40 PM, rick darwicki wrote: I remember when these first came out, building codes required them on the duplex outlet circuits to bedrooms so electric blankets didn't cause fires. Now a; /archives//html/RFI/2013-01/msg00049.html (8,812 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] Arc fault protection (score: 1): Author: Joe <wa6rkn@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 13:54:47 -0800; Here in Reno, in my house, certified for occupancy in 1988...There is a GFI device in each bathroom and in the kitchen. The downstairs GFI unit controls all the outlets in the garage. The kitchen GFI; /archives//html/RFI/2013-01/msg00051.html (8,400 bytes)
5. Re: [RFI] Arc fault protection (score: 1): Author: Christopher Brown <cbrown@woods.net>; Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 13:12:02 -0900; The practical problem with AFCI (Arc Fault Circuit Interrupter) devices is that they are supposed to sense RF. Yes, there is a RF detector in there. AFCI devices are available in both AFCI only, and; /archives//html/RFI/2013-01/msg00052.html (11,192 bytes)
6. Re: [RFI] Arc fault protection (score: 1): Author: Charles Coldwell <coldwell@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 19:04:01 -0500; Perhaps this explains why the ham whose transmissions were triggering the AFCI was not interested in troubleshooting this issue. -- Charles M. Coldwell, W1CMC "Turn on, log in, tune out" Belmont, Mas; /archives//html/RFI/2013-01/msg00054.html (7,677 bytes)
7. Re: [RFI] Arc fault protection (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 00:02:52 -0800; I suspect that's an oversimplification. I can believe that there's a high pass filter in front of the detector, but any responsible design should include a reasonable high frequency limit. BUT -- it; /archives//html/RFI/2013-01/msg00057.html (8,434 bytes)
8. Re: [RFI] Arc fault protection (score: 1): Author: Richard Battles <wb4byq@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2013 07:52:27 -0600; Just to say this, the sub panel in the house that i live in, has 7 Square D AFCI. i run two amps, on ssb. i have a yeasu fl-2100b and a Ameritron AL-80B. the antennas are with 30 to 40 feet from the; /archives//html/RFI/2013-01/msg00058.html (9,142 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]